Romney Backs Away From Own Tax Plan
Source: TPM
At the first presidential debate in Colorado Wednesday night, former Gov. Mitt Romney disputed a central criticism of his tax reform plan and appeared to disavow one of its central features.
Responding to President Obamas description of Romneys proposal, Romney claimed: I dont have a $5 trillion tax cut. I dont have a tax cut of the scale youre talking about. I think we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I wont reduce the share of tax paid by high-income people.
Im not looking to cut massive taxes and to reduce revenues going to the government. My number one principal is, there will be no tax cut that adds to the deficit. I want to underline that no tax cut that will add to the deficit.
So whos right?
Romney has run for months on a plan to lower everyones tax rates by 20 percent an amount that independent analysts have concluded will reduce revenues by $5 trillion over 10 years.
Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/romney-backs-away-from-own-tax-plan.php?ref=fpa
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Born Free
(1,612 posts)Reminds me of Muhammad Ali and George Foreman where Ali allowed Foreman to do all the work and waited him out. Good for Romney, the Main Stream Media will say he won round 1 and now that Main Stream Media has proven they can and will call Romney the winner if he earns it, they do not need to feel obligated to cut him any more "affirmative action". Democrats may not like taking a hit, but some times we need to.
Of course we Dems can have some fun with the whole idea that Obama believed Osama Bin Laden was a threat whereas Romney thinks the threat is Big Bird. Or maybe - "Someone should explain to to the out of touch Romney that "Women and children first" was meant for the "Lifeboats & safety" not a #waronwomen and #waronbigbird It could also be interesting to note that Romney speaks out against Big Bird and wants to stop children from learning from the gang as Sesame Street but stood by while Rush Limbaugh called a young woman a "slut" for 3 days on public airwaves where children can listen has never expressed any problems with children listening to that.
Romney is, without a doubt the best Flim-Flam artist alive today
high density
(13,397 posts)that Romney has spewed a whole lot of crap tonight that we have never heard before. It's going to take a while to chew through all of these new positions.
Ebadlun
(336 posts)10s of millions are watching this, rather less people will be reading factcheck.org the day after.
I just don't think Romney's performance here is going to win him any new followers. What he's proposing just never adds up, as the President mentioned tonight.
Beartracks
(12,820 posts)Romnometry doesn't work.
=================
George II
(67,782 posts)I think that may have been part of the Obama campaign's objective - "don't try to win anyone over at the risk of losing backers"
wordpix
(18,652 posts)as in "I told you the guy's really a liberal from Mass, and not 'one of us'."
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)but the president will be ready for him next time.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)blasted all over swing states for the next 5 weeks. Romney has hanged himself with his own rope.
Lugnut
(9,791 posts)I'm glad that the Prez remained cool and presidential.
uncle ray
(3,157 posts)thanks to our good friends sitting on the Supreme Court.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Content not important, and the repugs will be having wet dreams tonight!
high density
(13,397 posts)What they thought about this doesn't really matter.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)the 20% across the board cut - so, this is a change over the last 24 hours
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Changing everything at the last minute to be witty?
FAIL!
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...and offered aspirations, rather than plans.
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)Lehrer was terrible. He allowed Romney to just ignore him and ignore all rules. The questions were also horrible.Never seen anything like this before.
He's done this before... He really should be replaced. If there was a good host, that host would be able to get the most out of each candidate. Lehrer just wasted time.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)He's a snake.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)That's Romney.
Carol Lynn
(21 posts)he is a slimey snake.
triplepoint
(431 posts)It'll set a new record for lies in a Presidential Debate. He sure knows how to bury himself. King of flip flopping politicians--past and present. And that lie about President Obama cutting funding to Medicare. The President didn't even bother to refute it...He's already done that...many times....publicly. Nothing's changed from this debate. Those that willingly believe lying romney are likely unrecruitable by those that know better. Just some advice for those doing phone banking and canvassing to re-elect President Obama.
Note: Just reading the debate's transcript, President Obama won it. Watching it on the boobtube, romney won for form and President Obama won for substance. That's how I see it at this point in time.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Dan
(3,577 posts)a liar - and one that changes positions on the fly.
O is handicapped by being an honest man.
I think one quest that the POTUS should have asked - before answering each question is - what position are you taking, now?
defacto7
(13,485 posts)was that... he really needs to keep his eyes up more. I know they are looking at notes but he just need to look up. I think he agreed with Romney too much as well, but these are just cosmetic things.
Obama again showed he is the only real intelligence up there. I just hope the American people see that as well.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)and amused the other half.
i think he was thinking how to pin this slippery bastard down, to tie him to his (pre-last night) policies.
Jessy169
(602 posts)As was I. It is unbelieveable how Romney can stand in front of the camera and a national audience and lie so blatently, misrepresent facts so easily, and do it all with an energy and "crispness" that admittedly I don't think I've seen from Romney (except in his private 47% video). It is almost as if Romney is most comfortable when he's spewing the lies. Obama could have started disputing and trying to counter the lies and falsehoods, but he didn't -- too many of them. Romney stunned me too, and I was just sitting here watching.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)I think it was a smart move by the President. You cannot debate a liar. You let them talk and expose themselves.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)I don't think he was stunned though... just balancing the boat well.
And about being comfortable with lies and bull shit... It's called borderline sociopathic.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I'm hopeful that all of the lies will create a backlash.
If my wife got angry, I bet others who, like her, are not very political also didn't appreciate having Mitt lie to their faces.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)President Obama is a truly a chess player. The president let Romney talk and talk. Now Romney will have to reconcile what he said tonight with what he said in the past.
There is also a countdown to when Romney will be caught contradicting himself in future speeches.
This is the beginning of the end for Romney. Let the Republicans and those who thought it should have been a boxing match talk positively about Romney...I know Romney's words will bury him. Literally!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)lastlib
(23,265 posts)VespertineIconoclast
(1,130 posts)magic59
(429 posts)Like the rocky movies where the champ gets complacent and gets his ass kicked, the president needs to get back the eye of the tiger before he gets back into the ring with Romney.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)that Obama was complacent or got his ass kicked. No way. He just let Romney dig a hole of lies and let him fall into it. The judgement will be the facts vs. the bull shit. That's the fight where Obama was leading the charge. Although I wish the President had disagreed with him more, Romney just put on a display, Obama kept cool and displayed the facts.
magic59
(429 posts),spend most of his time pointing out the Romney flip flops. OK, he laid out his plans, too long, but he did so now he can get busy and crush Romney at his own game.
Carol Lynn
(21 posts)I don't think he should sound too aggressive. He needs to show us he has considered every aspect of the issue and chosen the wise course. THoughtful and intelligent.
oliverrams1
(60 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:39 PM - Edit history (1)
strong position because he has the facts on his side. I just can't see how Romney can win by saying one thing one day and something different tonight. OMG Americans are not stupid.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)The rest will have to decide whether truth trumps glitz.
BTW....
Welcome to DU all of you new posters!
MiniJ2012
(4 posts)If you muted your TV, you could see Mitt Romney's poor body language. Also, not a strong move to argue with the moderator. He looked like a child saying "nani-nani" with his finger pointing...he did NOT look like a leader. Romney will lose because his lies tonight will backfire on him!
Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)Romney had the stronger body language...looked right at Obama while Obama looked down..pathetically defensive..
Romney spoke with conviction...Obama was hesitant
Yes Romney lied..and everyone knew he would but Obama let him get away with it..that's all that matters..
MiniJ2012
(4 posts)I guess if you believe a liar you think the body language was strong. When all is said and done, Romney will look like the loser through all of the debates. Obama looked down in his debate with McCain as well and HE WON! But maybe you voted for McCain...
goclark
(30,404 posts)Pinnokio was in the room last night.
lastlib
(23,265 posts)I had trouble finding anything he said tonight that squared with what he (or Ryan) has/have said in the course of the campaign.
father_of_2
(2 posts)Mitt Romney clearly lost this debate and could not back up his plans with either a solid plan or defend himself against the President. Mr. Romney clearly looked frightened, scared, bewildered and came off sort of testy. Mitt Romney also did not connect with my family. Even the children watched. He seemed so out of touch with realities and almost robot like. Mitt Romney clearly will be proven wrong by the fact checkers and his suggestion of transferring so many federal programs to the state level when they are cash strapped is deeply flawed and out of touch. I doubt there will be any post-debate bounce on this one for Mitt that will make any sort of difference. Mitt the clock is running and you looked disparate tonight. My oldest son who is in college mentioned this to me. Even the young can tell.
oliverrams1
(60 posts)Please explain why they hated the Presidents debate performance so much. I guess as a voter I am looking for the truth in a President, not someone who just attacks with nothing but lies and flip flops.
father_of_2
(2 posts)Chuck Todd on his post-debate coverage said this was a clear win for Mitt Romney. He must have been watching another debate and I informed him of what I thought of his flawed analysis. The President won this one hands down.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)MSNBC can counter the lies with the truth, just compare Rmoney's statementts from last night to the rest of the year.
oliverrams1
(60 posts)I still think that the truth will win this election. {Not how you present your pack of lies.}
andym
(5,445 posts)"look at your website Mitt-- it says a 20% across the board cut on marginal tax rates.
In fact, you've said it multiple times. Guess what? That 20% cut costs 5 trillion dollars...."
roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)of course, he could have bet rmoney 10,000 dollars...
kiranon
(1,727 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)CreoleCarl
(7 posts)Mitt was better than expected, Chris Christie was right about the thursday talking points, but on Friday, the truth squads will be cutting the style down to the lies that were told by the challenger. Mitts campaign will have to walk back several "points" some watchers gave to him. The President will still have a lead in the polls, the race will narrow, then the liars will be called to count for everything they have said and said and said .....
Keep talking about the how a smiling Mitt is like that smiling salesman who sold you something you did not need and then cost more than he said it would. The smarmy smile he had on his face is just like that iconic used car salesman we make so much fun of. He will be called out for his untruths later, from both the right and the left.
FORWARD!
Justkd1
(64 posts)Really surprised no one is talking about Romney not releasing all if this tax returns...that liar wants to talk about tax policy and closing loopholes? We can't see what he already takes advantage of? We don't get to look inside the world of someone who exploits loopholes and shelters money around the world? We as Americans, Democrat, Independent or Republican, should have the right to know what his tax history is and he as a candidate for higher office, should be more than happy to provide the information!
Does anyone honestly think if Obama had this background, that it wouldn't be on the table?!