Space Force unveils 'semper supra' motto, delta logo
Source: The Hill
The U.S. Space Forces official motto will be semper supra, the Latin for always above, the military service announced Wednesday.
The Space Force also unveiled Wednesday its official logo, a silver delta symbol with the Polaris star in the center, spires at the top representing a rocket launch and beveled elements on the edges to symbolize jointness with the other military branches.
We are building a new Service to secure the space domain... the ultimate high ground, Chief of Space Operations Gen. John Raymond tweeted Wednesday. Our strategic imperative is to ensure that our space capabilities & the advantages they provide the nation & our Joint and Coalition partners are always there. #SemperSupra!
Last week, the service announced it had chosen the first 2,410 airmen who will transfer into the Space Force starting Sept. 1.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/508559-space-force-unveils-semper-supra-motto-delta-logo
Officially, the Space Force only has 88 sworn-in members: Raymond, senior enlisted adviser Chief Master Sgt. Roger Towberman and 86 Air Force Academy graduates who commissioned directly into the Space Force upon graduation in April.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Might as well start handing out red shirts.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)wcmagumba
(2,886 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)Space Command has been around for about 40 years now.
pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)I've always heard that the Republicans are anti-big government. We just keep adding more and more useless crap. Time to clean up the mess. Let's start with fumigating the White House and carry on from there.
Zorro
(15,740 posts)The creation of this branch is basically a restructuring effort to consolidate space-related military functions under one command.
There are pros and cons to this merging of disparate space organizations from internal AF and other service branches, but it should lead to streamlining coordination between different military programs.
pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)dchill
(38,501 posts)...that there was already a Space Command!
rickford66
(5,523 posts)Grokenstein
(5,723 posts)"You...you didn't take us seriously, did you? ...You DID! You did take us seriously! Oh my god! You're a fucking idiot!"
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Is this a new new logo?
Anyway, fuck the space force. Not that trump cares, but I thought the U.S. was party to an international treaty that pledges only peaceful utilization of space.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)January 24, 2020
In the voyage to the final frontier there is a wave of ridicule being directed toward President Trump who unveiled the U.S. Space Force logo on Friday afternoon. (January 17, 2020)
"After consultation with our Great Military Leaders, designers and others, I am pleased to present the new logo for the United States Space Force, the Sixth Branch of our Magnificent Military!" Trump tweeted.
Welp, it appears as though many of those great leaders "and others" were likely even if subconsciously influenced by Star Trek because the design of its signature image is nearly identical.
"THIS IS THE STARFLEET LOGO!" The New York Times reporter Sopan Deb was quick to text-shout on Twitter.
"THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TOOK A THING FROM A TV SHOW AND MADE IT THE OFFICIAL EMBLEM OF A BRANCH OF THE MILITARY," he continued.
To many critics it seems highly illogical that the similarities to the iconic patch from the beloved television program were not somehow ... modified. That the administration has approved and boldly gone where 1960s television art designers went decades ago is absolutely baffling.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... nuclear weapons and "military moon bases".
First, it contains an undertaking not to place in orbit around the Earth, install on the moon or any other celestial body, or otherwise station in outer space, nuclear or any other weapons of mass destruction.
Second, it limits the use of the moon and other celestial bodies exclusively to peaceful purposes and expressly prohibits their use for establishing military bases, installation, or fortifications; testing weapons of any kind; or conducting military maneuvers.
https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm
Space is now considered a contested region. That's why the Space Force was created.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)My question would be - what constitutes a "weapon of mass destruction" when it's being deployed from orbit?
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... does not define the term. The term is defined by one source as
https://www.dhs.gov/topic/weapons-mass-destruction
Here is an interesting article in the Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon_of_mass_destruction
Apparently the term has been used for quite some time and first referred to massive areal bombardment.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)weapons platform capable of shooting down another country's communication satellites be considered a type of "mass destruction" - due to how much damage it could cause to that country's infrastructure?
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... space force. Early on, space was an uncontested region. Like Antarctica. Our military, and other nations militaries, placed assets in space and have become very dependent on them. This includes communications, situational awareness and GPS.
Now there are efforts by our adversaries to develop the capability to "take out" these assets. Doing so at the right place and time would be a crippling blow to a military operation. Space is now a contested region. That is why the space force has been created.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)or "What a Savings" - I'm not fussy.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,464 posts)pecosbob
(7,541 posts)This travesty will not survive even one year of the new administration.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)Foolacious
(497 posts)howardmappel
(80 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)who are part of the Navy.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)as USMC is to the Navy.
The idea (from people other than Trump) is that USAF command space missions and personnel got shortchanged by fighter jockey's when it came to promotion, funding, etc. IDK if it was true, but that's what some senators thought.
In reality, I think cyber, both offensive and defensive, is more important than space for the foreseeable future. It faces a different set of challenges though since good cyber people have to be paid outside the military chain of command, and then you wind up with defense contractors which suck.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... to military operations and weapons systems. Almost all communications systems have a space component, space is very important for situational awareness, and then there is GPS.
Space has become a contested region, so our space assets have become very vulnerable. The "high ground of space" makes you an easy target.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)#newrostrong
NellieStarbuck
(266 posts)Little stars on a navy blue background?
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)hay rick
(7,621 posts)hatrack
(59,587 posts)The first, of course, is DHS.
Zorro
(15,740 posts)Polybius
(15,423 posts)It was signed into legislation.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Polybius
(15,423 posts)Hopefully we take the Senate.
area51
(11,909 posts)but there's no money for healthcare for all?