Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mrs. Overall

(6,839 posts)
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 11:06 AM Jun 2020

Judge: Bolton can publish book despite efforts to block it

Source: AP

A federal judge ruled Saturday that former national security adviser John Bolton can move forward in publishing his tell-all book despite efforts by the Trump administration to block the release because of concerns that classified information could be exposed.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth is a victory for Bolton in a court case that involved core First Amendment and national security concerns. But the judge also made clear his concerns that Bolton had “gambled with the national security of the United States” by opting out of a prepublication review process meant to prevent government officials from spilling classified secrets in memoirs they publish.

The ruling clears the path for a broader election-year readership and distribution of a memoir, due out Tuesday, that paints an unflattering portrait of President Donald Trump’s foreign policy decision-making during the turbulent year-and-a-half that Bolton spent in the White House.

Nonethless, Lamberth frowned upon the way Bolton went about publishing the book. Bolton took it “upon himself to publish his book without securing final approval from national intelligence authorities” and perhaps caused irreparable harm to national security, Lamberth said.

Read more: https://apnews.com/dd4d178b8050739c915e455e022347ae

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Bolton can publish book despite efforts to block it (Original Post) Mrs. Overall Jun 2020 OP
That's gonna sting! Maeve Jun 2020 #1
I saw that we posted almost exactly at the same time! Mrs. Overall Jun 2020 #2
What can I say? Good news travels fast!! Maeve Jun 2020 #3
Randy SF actually posted it 45 mins ago : mucifer Jun 2020 #4
Ah, but in GD--and yeah, it's worth celebrating! Maeve Jun 2020 #5
Federal Judge stands behind and for Amendment 1 of U.S. Constitution!!! Stuart G Jun 2020 #6
The judge is no first amendment purist... reACTIONary Jun 2020 #14
That's great. I wonder how many times Berman is mentioned in the book? George II Jun 2020 #7
Hopefully, bolton was 'in the room' for those conversation. riversedge Jun 2020 #9
K&R Thekaspervote Jun 2020 #8
"...caused irreparable harm to national security" durablend Jun 2020 #10
I agree. not_the_one Jun 2020 #13
"Silent" majority of voters are for DACA... Lock him up. Jun 2020 #17
BINGO! K&R onetexan Jun 2020 #16
If Trump were to shot someone on 5th Avenue he probably would wish it was Bolton. Edwcraig Jun 2020 #11
I would think so mvd Jun 2020 #12
This is good news, BUT.... reACTIONary Jun 2020 #15
How could Bolton harm national security any further? Sovereignty went out the window in 2016 bucolic_frolic Jun 2020 #18
Trump thanks the judge and calls it a win. marie999 Jun 2020 #19
The book has been leaked finally AnyFunctioningAdult Jun 2020 #20

Stuart G

(38,445 posts)
6. Federal Judge stands behind and for Amendment 1 of U.S. Constitution!!!
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 11:17 AM
Jun 2020

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

reACTIONary

(5,771 posts)
14. The judge is no first amendment purist...
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 02:42 PM
Jun 2020

... his ruling was simply that there is no practice way to remedy the harm that, he seems to believe, has already been done.

We have a ways to go as yet. But at least we will be able to judge for ourselves.

 

not_the_one

(2,227 posts)
13. I agree.
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 01:44 PM
Jun 2020

And it just gives the turd more ammunition to appeal to the barely adequates (formerly The Supremes). He can now point to a JUDGE that has agreed that Bolten released confidential information that caused irreparable harm to national security. So what if the book is out, he can still go after the $$$. THAT is what he is after. He is padding the "escape" fund as we speak.

WHY do they keep throwing bones to the turd. (Like Justice Roberts telling the turd EXACTLY how to re-file the DACA appeal so he can vote FOR it...) They KNOW he will pursue them.

mvd

(65,180 posts)
12. I would think so
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 01:19 PM
Jun 2020

If judges start blocking books, we aren’t far from Fahrenheit 451 territory. I will hear about the book on DU and other liberal places since he’s too slimy for me to support by buying.

reACTIONary

(5,771 posts)
15. This is good news, BUT....
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 02:47 PM
Jun 2020

... the judge is NOT a first amendment purist. He seems to believe that the book does contain classified information and that Bolton did break his prepublication review agreement with the government. Hiss ruling against the requested injunction was simply that it was too late and would do no good.

 

marie999

(3,334 posts)
19. Trump thanks the judge and calls it a win.
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 06:12 PM
Jun 2020

Says the judge had to let it be published because the horses had left the barn.

20. The book has been leaked finally
Sat Jun 20, 2020, 08:13 PM
Jun 2020

Long time lurker but I finally made an account to relay the info. Maybe someone already posted it, but the book has been leaked to the usual places for such things. No stopping it now!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge: Bolton can publish...