Ex-judge tapped to review Flynn case blasts DOJ for 'pretextual' effort to drop charges
Source: Politico
A former judge selected to advise on a path forward in the criminal case against Michael Flynn is accusing the Justice Department of distorting the justice system to protect an ally of President Donald Trump by attempting to shut down the prosecution.
The former federal judge, John Gleeson, is recommending that the judge handling the case instead proceed to sentence the former Trump national security adviser on the false-statement charge he admitted to two-and-a-half years ago.
"The facts surrounding the filing of the Government's motion constitute clear evidence of gross prosecutorial abuse. They reveal an unconvincing effort to disguise as legitimate a decision to dismiss that is based solely on the fact that Flynn is a political ally of President Trump," Gleeson wrote in a filing Wednesday with Washington-based U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan, who formally tapped Gleeson to weigh in as a friend of the court.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/10/gleeson-flynn-sullivan-barr-justice-department-311018
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)underpants
(182,868 posts)Everything about this is irregular, Gleeson wrote.
President Trump today has the unreviewable authority to issue a pardon, thus ensuring that Flynn is no longer prosecuted and never punished for his crimes because he is a friend and political ally, Gleeson continued. But the instant the Executive Branch filed a criminal charge against Flynn, it forfeited the right to implicate this Court in the dismissal of that charge simply because Flynn is a friend and political ally of the President.
Leghorn21
(13,526 posts)CLEAR EVIDENCE OF GROSS PROSECUTORIAL ABUSE MUTHAFUCKAHS
JUDGE GLEESON:
RESPECT
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,826 posts)It sets out every shitty detail about what Flynn did and what he continues to do. (And we know damn well that his conversations with Kislyak about sanctions must have directed by Trump and would have been communicated back to him after the fact even though there's no direct proof.)