"Most Dangerous City in America" Is Disbanding Its Current Police Force
Source: New York Times
"Most Dangerous City in America" Is Disbanding Its Current Police Force
Saturday, 29 September 2012 11:36 By Kate Zernike, The New York Times News Service | Report
Camden, New Jersey - Two gruesome murders of children last month a toddler decapitated, a 6-year-old stabbed in his sleep served as reminders of this citys reputation as the most dangerous in America. Others can be found along the blocks of row houses spray-painted R.I.P., empty liquor bottles clustered on their porches in memorial to murder victims.
The police acknowledge that they have all but ceded these streets to crime, with murders on track to break records this year. And now, in a desperate move to regain control, city officials are planning to disband the Police Department.
The reason, officials say, is that generous union contracts have made it financially impossible to keep enough officers on the street. So in November, Camden, which has already had substantial police layoffs, will begin terminating the remaining 273 officers and give control to a new county force. The move, officials say, will free up millions to hire a larger, nonunionized force of 400 officers to safeguard the city, which is also the nations poorest.
Hardly a political battle of the last several years has been fiercer than the one over the fate of public sector unions. But Camdens decision to remake perhaps the most essential public service for a city riven by crime underscores how communities are taking previously unimaginable steps to get out from under union obligations that built up over generations.
Read more: http://truth-out.org/news/item/11850-most-dangerous-city-in-america-disbanding-its-police-force
xchrom
(108,903 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)A GOP wet dream, wrapped in the disguise of "bi-partisanship."
Operation Northwoods
iemitsu
(3,888 posts)i hope it backfires big time.
for profit businesses never provide a better service than public sector workers.
its time we tax the rich to pay for our needs. they have gotten a free ride way too long.
aikoaiko
(34,177 posts)This is really stunning.
choie
(4,111 posts)bankrupting a city that then needs to disband a union job force and privatize services. Perfect!
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Chris Christie is just loving this..
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)one of his friends owns such a firm outright.
Any time "privatization" comes up, you can be sure they're going to pick someone who is a friend of the guys in power.
Example: A Republican state legislator from the western suburbs of Portland, Oregon was against public transit and proposed replacing further transit extensions with a system of jitney buses. Turned out that one of her major contributors had a business plan for a system of jitney buses and just needed a little public money to get started...
Snarkoleptic
(5,998 posts)This race to the bottom stuff will erode cop input into policy and procedure.
Also, who know what sort of hiring standards will be in place. I envision a bunch of cop wannabees like George Zimmerman patrolling the streets.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 09:54 PM - Edit history (1)
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Admin mismanagement somehow always translates into union contracts. Blame is better to give than receive
byeya
(2,842 posts)information that the cops have built up over the decades on people, places, small businesses - everything. County scabs will start at zero and be ineffective at best.
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel
(3,273 posts)alp227
(32,044 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)"Though the city is solidly Democratic, the plan to put the Police Department out of business has not prompted the wide public outcry seen in the union battles in Chicago, Ohio or Wisconsin, in part because many residents have come to resent a police force they see as incompetent, corrupt and doing little to make their streets safe."
"Officials say that simply adding officers will not make all the difference, given the deep suspicion many residents harbor toward the police. As the chief and his deputy drove through the Whitman Park neighborhood this month, people sitting on their stoops stood up to shake their fists and shout obscenities at them. When police officers arrested a person suspected of dealing drugs in a house on a narrow street in North Camden last year, residents set upon their cars and freed the prisoner."
Occupy Camden. Free drugs for all addicts.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Yeah, and free burials for the Overdoses, right?
I can understand why people can distrust the cops, but leaving the city open to ever Mafia, Crip, or (insert gang here) is NOT the solution.
That's what they do in many places, Switzerland, Holland, Germany, Portugal. The results are very good, addicts get clean stuff instead of street poisons, they don't have to do petty crime and/or sell drugs and get more customers to buy drugs, they don't have to be afraid of going to doctor but get health care as part of the program. And there is no black market demand for drug supply from Mafia, Crip, or (insert gang here).
Practical common sense. Something that drug war idiotism has huge problem with.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Another to actively make them. I could even see giving addicts needles, to slow down the spread of disease to others that have no way of knowing their lover is doing smack, but to enourage something that will kill them and make their lives lesslivable is not heloing the issue.
Free treatment yes, free needles even, yes, but no free smack or coke.
The results of the Swiss heroin program are very good (http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2009/s2776476.htm). It's for addicts to whom no other treatment program works. Besides addiction, long term use of opiates gives only constipation - nothing compared to tobacco and alcohol. What is killing addicts and making their lives less livable is the consequenses of criminalization - impure drug etc. etc.
Coke and meth is another story, granted.
Needs to make sure the NYPD learns of this- once the 1% are done with the NYPD they will do the same to them.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)As it turns out, JPMorgan is not the only financial institution that has been generous to the police foundation. In the 2009-10 year, Goldman Sachs, Barclays Capital, investment bank Jeffries and Co., investor Carl Icahn, and investment firm The Renco Group each gave over $100,000 to the foundation, putting them in the top-tier of donors, according to the foundations website. Bank of America also gave over $75,000 that year. (Another $100,000+ donor was Rupert Murdochs News Corp.)
Keep in mind thats just a single years worth of donations. As a private non-profit, the New York City Police Foundation does not have to release detailed donor information, so we dont know of the the full scope of Wall Street money flowing into the NYPD.
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/the_nypd_now_sponsored_by_wall_street/
Privatization leads to FDR's definition of fascism:
The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power. ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt
bemildred
(90,061 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)... but isn't what Camden, NJ doing essentially contracting out their police force to a sub-contractor? And if there are displaced law enforcement officers, aren't they entitled to keep their job with the new contractor, same pay & benefits and such? I may still be stuck in England with my knowledge of local government but over there if the local authority (link city hall, county commissioners) contracts out one of their core responsibilities to another company, the incumbent employees *must* be offered jobs with the new contractor at the same pay and equivalent benefits.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)The union busters will shut even you down
Work together, or die alone
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)"every day, nearly 30 percent of the force does not show up. (A typical rate elsewhere is in the single digits.)"
Assuming for the moment that that number is correct then you tell me, have you ever heard of a company being able to stay in business where 30% of the employees call in sick daily?
I'm not saying its a good idea that they are breaking up the union to do this just that the police arent innocent little lambs and do appear to share in causing it to happen.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)they once were
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)they in essence did it to themselves.
Cronkite
(158 posts)When a pension plan uses an anticipated return of 8% on assets and the federal reserve sets interest rates at zero for years on end the pension plan is in trouble. All this crap has been done to save the TBTF banks from their bad business decisions.
byeya
(2,842 posts)of them retirees; and university endowments are all suffering because of it.
The Republicans refuse to allow a much needed public works program and Obama is unable to break the stranglehold so we are left with a Republican - Bernacke - to use what is available to the Fed.
Lucky Luciano
(11,258 posts)with congress to do something and they have not. He wants fiscal stimulus to work with his monetary stimulus.
obamanut2012
(26,087 posts)They also got rid of their fire department a year or so ago.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)ancianita
(36,126 posts)cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)"Officials say they anticipate salaries for the new force will range from $47,000 to $87,000."
Thats a hell of alot more cash than my brother who has worked full time as an assistant produce manager for the past 25+ years makes and hes lifting and moving heavy boxes nearly every day at work all day.
obamanut2012
(26,087 posts)Not that the cops are paid less.
This is what they want you to feel and say. They want to divide labor using these tactics, and sow contempt for public employees.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)tama
(9,137 posts)In this case they are not perceived as part of the community but enemy of the community.
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)slim I fear, well ok the odds of the lottery are alot slimmer but not by to much.
daleo
(21,317 posts)Poorly paid cops are an invitation to corruption and disrespect foe the law. This ia common knowledge in poor countries.
tama
(9,137 posts)the community has no respect even for the current unionized police but perceive them as corrupt thugs who persecute people because of drug war. So that is not a very strong argument.
daleo
(21,317 posts)Poorly paid cops would add small time shakedowns to other forms of corruption.
tama
(9,137 posts)but just the usual attempt to fix the problem by making it worse and creating additional problems.
What are the root causes of the problem and is there a way to stop causing the problem? Article clearly points out drug war as if not the only, certainly one of the main causes of the problem. So, just stop criminalizing drugs or if not possible, enforcing the law that creates organized crime = no police better than corrupt police making the situation just worse and save tax payer money for something that might actually help. Like healthcare, food, homes for homeless and free drugs for addicts so the the market demand for drug gangs goes away.
daleo
(21,317 posts)I also agree with you about improving the social safety net as being a more cost effective and efficient way to solve problems than an excessive emphasis on law and order (i.e. cops and jails).
tama
(9,137 posts)to work towards those goals than just voting Democrats?
daleo
(21,317 posts)Political parties aren't all that responsive to social change, even when they talk a good game. We seem to be in a period where all parties are cozying up to corporate interests and that thwarts progress, to a considerable extent. I guess it's important not to give up, recognize change will come from below, and keep the discussion going.
On global level the idea of open "from below" processes of drafting new constitutions might be the new "mainstream" revolutionary idea. Iceland did it, Spanish people are demanding it, and anyone can call a General Assembly to discuss the idea. It would be dream come true for many net activists...
hack89
(39,171 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)What could possibly go wrong?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Not according to the article:
We cannot move the city forward unless we address public safety, the mayor, Dana L. Redd, said. This is about putting boots on the ground.
Even union officials acknowledge that the contract is rich with expensive provisions. For example, officers earn an additional 4 percent for working a day shift, and an additional 10 percent for the shift starting at 9:30 p.m. They earn an additional 11 percent for working on a special tactical force or an anticrime patrol.
Salaries range from about $47,000 to $81,000 now, not including the shift differentials or additional longevity payments of 3 percent to 11 percent for any officer who has worked five years or more. Officials say they anticipate salaries for the new force will range from $47,000 to $87,000.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)But it seems pretty comparable to my military pay scale, albeit perhaps a larger starting salary.
I don't get overtime, or a shift incentive pay.
And I certainly don't get to have a union, so I'm rather ambiguous on that subject.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)Sure. That's what they need.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)We've already seen how this works out. Except, this time, they will have guns.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)it would be so disappointing if you were making a snide comment about my hometown at a sad time like this. Sad for Camden, sad for all of us.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)I'm not trying to steal the subject away from Camden; I feel bad for them right now. Your good wishes do you credit.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)good luck with that
Warpy
(111,305 posts)which is a bunch of green cops with no old timers around to guide them in dealing with the crap cops see every day and in how to keep a lid on their own behavior.
I wouldn't want to live in such a place.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I am not even sure if this is an issue of money. By going non union it seems to me they will have officers working that have less pride in their work. Not that the current situation is good, it isn't not even by a long shot however I would lay odds that at least some of the current officers have pride in their jobs, the non union police, not so much.
tama
(9,137 posts)Where I live there have been lot's of "rationalizations" of Police Departments, which means that especially some small rural communities are very seldom visited by police officers.
For example there is a small island community of few hundred people which I know relatively well, and the locals tell me that when a police unit is coming, ferry informs and warns some locals and grapevine informs rest, so everyone knows e.g. to drive "orderly" to avoid trouble with police. I heard there was once a thief visiting the island, but locals did not bother to call police but just put the guy on ferry and made clear that it would be very bad idea to return. So it would seem that at least small tight communities where everybody knows everybody else don't much need police and don't want police outsiders bothering them.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)And I'm a middle-aged white guy.
Camden is a deindustrialization disaster area. What it needs is jobs.
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:00 AM - Edit history (1)
come in and invest in the area is difficult so they have to start somewhere.
Does it suck that its breaking a union? Sure but the members of the union shoulder alot of that blame themselves when you consider that they are having almost 30% of the force not showing up for work each day.
Edit: And to put it into perspective lets they have 200 officers scheduled to work during the day and 30% of them dont show up, thats a total of 60 less police officers which means only 140 are doing jobs meant to be done by 200. I dont know about you but to me its like those 60 are giving a big middle finger both to their fellow officers and to the tax payers.
valerief
(53,235 posts)FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)decline for as long as I can remember. I grew up 30 miles away. There is no longer any industry or jobs to speak of. The police have a tradition of corruption. The residents are extremely poor, the city has little tax revenue. Camden is a depressing sight.
Back in the 1960's the city/county tore down rotting buildings and built block after block of new low income rental housing. Within months, a drive through of those apartments showed that the residents were not taking care of their homes, yards full of garbage - nasty place. I imagine they deteriorated so badly that they have probably since been abandoned or torn down (just a guess).
The city is a complete drain on the surrounding county and the state, also, I'm sure. I hate to say it, but most of Camden should be razed to the ground, especially the building shells that stand abandoned and destroyed. They need factories and businesses, but who would want to build a factory or business in such a place?
The two gruesome murders of children mentioned above - I remember a gruesome murder of a 2-year-old many years ago. Died from suffocation when a parent forced the contents of a dirty diaper into the child's face and plugged his nose and mouth with feces. Lovely things take place in that town.
The cops in that town haven't been very effective in many, many years. I'm all for unions, but in this case, something really needs to be done. They need an entirely new city.
tama
(9,137 posts)Start with guerilla gardening to build community gardens. Seriously.
PS: googled "Camden community garden" - lot's of links to Camden Australia, but also this:
http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20120917/NEWS01/309170018/Community-gardens-help-change-Camden
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The organs of the state (New Jersey, the US) have done nothing to help. Rather, US macroeconomic policies have turned the place into a sacrifice zone.
sweetapogee
(1,168 posts)but "nothing to help?" Did you make this up on the fly or do you know something the whole rest of the east coast doesn't? There is this thing call reality, even in Democratic cities. And exactly which location in Camden would you propose we occupy for maximum publicity and effect? Are you thinking The Big J? Sounds like fun! Meet you on the poop deck.