Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,588 posts)
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:38 PM Sep 2012

"Most Dangerous City in America" Is Disbanding Its Current Police Force

Source: New York Times

"Most Dangerous City in America" Is Disbanding Its Current Police Force
Saturday, 29 September 2012 11:36 By Kate Zernike, The New York Times News Service | Report

Camden, New Jersey - Two gruesome murders of children last month — a toddler decapitated, a 6-year-old stabbed in his sleep — served as reminders of this city’s reputation as the most dangerous in America. Others can be found along the blocks of row houses spray-painted “R.I.P.,” empty liquor bottles clustered on their porches in memorial to murder victims.

The police acknowledge that they have all but ceded these streets to crime, with murders on track to break records this year. And now, in a desperate move to regain control, city officials are planning to disband the Police Department.

The reason, officials say, is that generous union contracts have made it financially impossible to keep enough officers on the street. So in November, Camden, which has already had substantial police layoffs, will begin terminating the remaining 273 officers and give control to a new county force. The move, officials say, will free up millions to hire a larger, nonunionized force of 400 officers to safeguard the city, which is also the nation’s poorest.

Hardly a political battle of the last several years has been fiercer than the one over the fate of public sector unions. But Camden’s decision to remake perhaps the most essential public service for a city riven by crime underscores how communities are taking previously unimaginable steps to get out from under union obligations that built up over generations.

Read more: http://truth-out.org/news/item/11850-most-dangerous-city-in-america-disbanding-its-police-force

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Most Dangerous City in America" Is Disbanding Its Current Police Force (Original Post) Judi Lynn Sep 2012 OP
good luck, camden. nt xchrom Sep 2012 #1
Everything's going according to plan: blkmusclmachine Sep 2012 #31
i don't wish the city that does that to the police union luck. iemitsu Sep 2012 #55
Wow. Just when I thought nothing could surprise me anymore. aikoaiko Sep 2012 #2
it's a Republican wet dream choie Sep 2012 #3
I betting that AsahinaKimi Sep 2012 #22
I'm betting Christie has ownership in several private security firms. geckosfeet Sep 2012 #29
Chances are good that either Christie does or Lydia Leftcoast Sep 2012 #60
Oh, that's not going to go well. Snarkoleptic Sep 2012 #4
Think paramilitaries. Xe, whoever. Thanks, patriot/teabaggers, you are the fascist party. freshwest Sep 2012 #25
yea it's the union contract. assssholes leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #5
When you fire people who have worked in an area - police in this case - you lose all your byeya Sep 2012 #6
+1 Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Sep 2012 #45
True. And you thought the replacement refs screwed up the NFL bad enough. alp227 Oct 2012 #70
Police seen as part of the problem, not solution: tama Sep 2012 #7
Free drugs for all addicts? DonCoquixote Sep 2012 #59
Yep tama Sep 2012 #62
It is one thing to legalize drugs DonCoquixote Sep 2012 #67
smack tama Oct 2012 #68
OWS MysticLynx Sep 2012 #8
Bet the NYPD already knows it. They got $4.6 million from JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, etc: freshwest Sep 2012 #34
Fools. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #9
I don't know NJ law, or for that matter how it relates with unions... mwooldri Sep 2012 #10
We should broadcast this low and high...to anyone you know who is in law enforcement Taverner Sep 2012 #11
Oh in this case some of the onus might be with the police themselves. cstanleytech Sep 2012 #15
You are correct - however, it also shows that the police are no longer the "protected" union Taverner Sep 2012 #19
But there again by not showing up to do the job cstanleytech Sep 2012 #42
A lot of the blame for public pension failures can be placed on the federal reserve. Cronkite Sep 2012 #12
The Fed is engaging in interest rate suppression and pension funds; private citizens - a high % byeya Sep 2012 #17
Bernanke is doing what he can and has pleaded Lucky Luciano Sep 2012 #23
Blame the unions as usual obamanut2012 Sep 2012 #13
Ah yes. Hire poorly paid cops who will supplement their wages with bribes and extortion. McCamy Taylor Sep 2012 #14
I would lay odds on that. ancianita Sep 2012 #16
Poorly paid? cstanleytech Sep 2012 #18
You should hope your brother is some day paid what the cops are obamanut2012 Sep 2012 #20
This X1000 ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #27
Cops are special case tama Sep 2012 #36
Oh I do and I also hope to hit the lottery but the odds of either happening are cstanleytech Sep 2012 #38
Police corruption, bribery, etc. are likely results daleo Sep 2012 #21
If you read the whole article tama Sep 2012 #26
That may be, but making low wages would almost certainly make things worse daleo Sep 2012 #33
Yes, not a step towards better direction tama Sep 2012 #35
I agree that the drug war causes more problems than it solves daleo Sep 2012 #37
So, any better ideas tama Sep 2012 #43
It's a hard question daleo Sep 2012 #47
Hmm tama Sep 2012 #49
Police corruption and bribery seems to be the present reality hack89 Sep 2012 #44
Underpaid cops in the most dangerous city in the US. lunatica Sep 2012 #24
Underpaid? PavePusher Sep 2012 #40
What wage do you think they should make? neverforget Sep 2012 #50
I really have no idea, I haven't made a study of police pay scales. PavePusher Sep 2012 #65
400 Mall Cops ThoughtCriminal Sep 2012 #28
Substitute refs in the NFL and substitute police in NJ - talk about a bad play book. Tigress DEM Sep 2012 #30
yup. Shadowflash Sep 2012 #56
Makes me wonder if Detroit is next. sarcasmo Sep 2012 #32
I hope you mean that in a concerned way navarth Sep 2012 #39
I hope that new company, Omni Consumer Products, can fix things in Detroit. Pterodactyl Sep 2012 #41
Thanks, I hope so too but navarth Sep 2012 #46
here's hoping the nonunion officers are better than the nonunion NFL refs wordpix Sep 2012 #48
They'll get what they pay for Warpy Sep 2012 #51
Most dangerous city in America, just got more dangerous. Kalidurga Sep 2012 #52
How necessary is Police Department? tama Sep 2012 #53
My experience with Camden cops is that they are a loutish, thuggish bunch. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #54
True but like the article points out without a safer environment getting companies to cstanleytech Sep 2012 #57
Only jobs coming are rent-a-cop jobs. nt valerief Sep 2012 #64
Camden has been in severe FlaGranny Sep 2012 #58
Occupy Camden tama Sep 2012 #63
I think something like that is the only real answer. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #66
I know you mean well... sweetapogee Oct 2012 #71
Wonderful, now they will be spared police brutality treestar Sep 2012 #61
This is unsettling. Quantess Oct 2012 #69
If you liked scab referees, you'll love scab cops! KamaAina Oct 2012 #72
 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
31. Everything's going according to plan:
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 09:37 PM
Sep 2012

A GOP wet dream, wrapped in the disguise of "bi-partisanship."


Operation Northwoods

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
55. i don't wish the city that does that to the police union luck.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 02:30 AM
Sep 2012

i hope it backfires big time.
for profit businesses never provide a better service than public sector workers.
its time we tax the rich to pay for our needs. they have gotten a free ride way too long.

choie

(4,111 posts)
3. it's a Republican wet dream
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:47 PM
Sep 2012

bankrupting a city that then needs to disband a union job force and privatize services. Perfect!

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
60. Chances are good that either Christie does or
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:24 AM
Sep 2012

one of his friends owns such a firm outright.

Any time "privatization" comes up, you can be sure they're going to pick someone who is a friend of the guys in power.

Example: A Republican state legislator from the western suburbs of Portland, Oregon was against public transit and proposed replacing further transit extensions with a system of jitney buses. Turned out that one of her major contributors had a business plan for a system of jitney buses and just needed a little public money to get started...

Snarkoleptic

(5,998 posts)
4. Oh, that's not going to go well.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:52 PM
Sep 2012

This race to the bottom stuff will erode cop input into policy and procedure.
Also, who know what sort of hiring standards will be in place. I envision a bunch of cop wannabees like George Zimmerman patrolling the streets.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
25. Think paramilitaries. Xe, whoever. Thanks, patriot/teabaggers, you are the fascist party.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:20 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sat Sep 29, 2012, 09:54 PM - Edit history (1)

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
5. yea it's the union contract. assssholes
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:53 PM
Sep 2012

Admin mismanagement somehow always translates into union contracts. Blame is better to give than receive

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
6. When you fire people who have worked in an area - police in this case - you lose all your
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 05:58 PM
Sep 2012

information that the cops have built up over the decades on people, places, small businesses - everything. County scabs will start at zero and be ineffective at best.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
7. Police seen as part of the problem, not solution:
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:00 PM
Sep 2012

"Though the city is solidly Democratic, the plan to put the Police Department out of business has not prompted the wide public outcry seen in the union battles in Chicago, Ohio or Wisconsin, in part because many residents have come to resent a police force they see as incompetent, corrupt and doing little to make their streets safe."

"Officials say that simply adding officers will not make all the difference, given the deep suspicion many residents harbor toward the police. As the chief and his deputy drove through the Whitman Park neighborhood this month, people sitting on their stoops stood up to shake their fists and shout obscenities at them. When police officers arrested a person suspected of dealing drugs in a house on a narrow street in North Camden last year, residents set upon their cars and freed the prisoner."

Occupy Camden. Free drugs for all addicts.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
59. Free drugs for all addicts?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:15 AM
Sep 2012

Yeah, and free burials for the Overdoses, right?

I can understand why people can distrust the cops, but leaving the city open to ever Mafia, Crip, or (insert gang here) is NOT the solution.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
62. Yep
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:53 AM
Sep 2012

That's what they do in many places, Switzerland, Holland, Germany, Portugal. The results are very good, addicts get clean stuff instead of street poisons, they don't have to do petty crime and/or sell drugs and get more customers to buy drugs, they don't have to be afraid of going to doctor but get health care as part of the program. And there is no black market demand for drug supply from Mafia, Crip, or (insert gang here).

Practical common sense. Something that drug war idiotism has huge problem with.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
67. It is one thing to legalize drugs
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 09:01 PM
Sep 2012

Another to actively make them. I could even see giving addicts needles, to slow down the spread of disease to others that have no way of knowing their lover is doing smack, but to enourage something that will kill them and make their lives lesslivable is not heloing the issue.

Free treatment yes, free needles even, yes, but no free smack or coke.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
68. smack
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 01:00 AM
Oct 2012

The results of the Swiss heroin program are very good (http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2009/s2776476.htm). It's for addicts to whom no other treatment program works. Besides addiction, long term use of opiates gives only constipation - nothing compared to tobacco and alcohol. What is killing addicts and making their lives less livable is the consequenses of criminalization - impure drug etc. etc.

Coke and meth is another story, granted.

MysticLynx

(51 posts)
8. OWS
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:00 PM
Sep 2012

Needs to make sure the NYPD learns of this- once the 1% are done with the NYPD they will do the same to them.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
34. Bet the NYPD already knows it. They got $4.6 million from JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, etc:
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:18 PM
Sep 2012
The NYPD, now sponsored by Wall Street

As it turns out, JPMorgan is not the only financial institution that has been generous to the police foundation. In the 2009-10 year, Goldman Sachs, Barclays Capital, investment bank Jeffries and Co., investor Carl Icahn, and investment firm The Renco Group each gave over $100,000 to the foundation, putting them in the top-tier of donors, according to the foundation’s website. Bank of America also gave over $75,000 that year. (Another $100,000+ donor was Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.)

Keep in mind that’s just a single year’s worth of donations. As a private non-profit, the New York City Police Foundation does not have to release detailed donor information, so we don’t know of the the full scope of Wall Street money flowing into the NYPD.

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/the_nypd_now_sponsored_by_wall_street/

Privatization leads to FDR's definition of fascism:

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt


mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
10. I don't know NJ law, or for that matter how it relates with unions...
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:18 PM
Sep 2012

... but isn't what Camden, NJ doing essentially contracting out their police force to a sub-contractor? And if there are displaced law enforcement officers, aren't they entitled to keep their job with the new contractor, same pay & benefits and such? I may still be stuck in England with my knowledge of local government but over there if the local authority (link city hall, county commissioners) contracts out one of their core responsibilities to another company, the incumbent employees *must* be offered jobs with the new contractor at the same pay and equivalent benefits.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
11. We should broadcast this low and high...to anyone you know who is in law enforcement
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:26 PM
Sep 2012

The union busters will shut even you down

Work together, or die alone

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
15. Oh in this case some of the onus might be with the police themselves.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:40 PM
Sep 2012

"every day, nearly 30 percent of the force does not show up. (A typical rate elsewhere is in the single digits.)"

Assuming for the moment that that number is correct then you tell me, have you ever heard of a company being able to stay in business where 30% of the employees call in sick daily?

I'm not saying its a good idea that they are breaking up the union to do this just that the police arent innocent little lambs and do appear to share in causing it to happen.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
19. You are correct - however, it also shows that the police are no longer the "protected" union
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:52 PM
Sep 2012

they once were

 

Cronkite

(158 posts)
12. A lot of the blame for public pension failures can be placed on the federal reserve.
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:29 PM
Sep 2012

When a pension plan uses an anticipated return of 8% on assets and the federal reserve sets interest rates at zero for years on end the pension plan is in trouble. All this crap has been done to save the TBTF banks from their bad business decisions.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
17. The Fed is engaging in interest rate suppression and pension funds; private citizens - a high %
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:44 PM
Sep 2012

of them retirees; and university endowments are all suffering because of it.

The Republicans refuse to allow a much needed public works program and Obama is unable to break the stranglehold so we are left with a Republican - Bernacke - to use what is available to the Fed.

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
23. Bernanke is doing what he can and has pleaded
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:23 PM
Sep 2012

with congress to do something and they have not. He wants fiscal stimulus to work with his monetary stimulus.

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
18. Poorly paid?
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:45 PM
Sep 2012

"Officials say they anticipate salaries for the new force will range from $47,000 to $87,000."
Thats a hell of alot more cash than my brother who has worked full time as an assistant produce manager for the past 25+ years makes and hes lifting and moving heavy boxes nearly every day at work all day.

obamanut2012

(26,087 posts)
20. You should hope your brother is some day paid what the cops are
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:54 PM
Sep 2012

Not that the cops are paid less.

This is what they want you to feel and say. They want to divide labor using these tactics, and sow contempt for public employees.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
36. Cops are special case
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:35 PM
Sep 2012

In this case they are not perceived as part of the community but enemy of the community.

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
38. Oh I do and I also hope to hit the lottery but the odds of either happening are
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:49 PM
Sep 2012

slim I fear, well ok the odds of the lottery are alot slimmer but not by to much.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
21. Police corruption, bribery, etc. are likely results
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 06:55 PM
Sep 2012

Poorly paid cops are an invitation to corruption and disrespect foe the law. This ia common knowledge in poor countries.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
26. If you read the whole article
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 08:25 PM
Sep 2012

the community has no respect even for the current unionized police but perceive them as corrupt thugs who persecute people because of drug war. So that is not a very strong argument.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
33. That may be, but making low wages would almost certainly make things worse
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:17 PM
Sep 2012

Poorly paid cops would add small time shakedowns to other forms of corruption.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
35. Yes, not a step towards better direction
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:33 PM
Sep 2012

but just the usual attempt to fix the problem by making it worse and creating additional problems.

What are the root causes of the problem and is there a way to stop causing the problem? Article clearly points out drug war as if not the only, certainly one of the main causes of the problem. So, just stop criminalizing drugs or if not possible, enforcing the law that creates organized crime = no police better than corrupt police making the situation just worse and save tax payer money for something that might actually help. Like healthcare, food, homes for homeless and free drugs for addicts so the the market demand for drug gangs goes away.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
37. I agree that the drug war causes more problems than it solves
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:45 PM
Sep 2012

I also agree with you about improving the social safety net as being a more cost effective and efficient way to solve problems than an excessive emphasis on law and order (i.e. cops and jails).

daleo

(21,317 posts)
47. It's a hard question
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:03 AM
Sep 2012

Political parties aren't all that responsive to social change, even when they talk a good game. We seem to be in a period where all parties are cozying up to corporate interests and that thwarts progress, to a considerable extent. I guess it's important not to give up, recognize change will come from below, and keep the discussion going.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
49. Hmm
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:16 AM
Sep 2012

On global level the idea of open "from below" processes of drafting new constitutions might be the new "mainstream" revolutionary idea. Iceland did it, Spanish people are demanding it, and anyone can call a General Assembly to discuss the idea. It would be dream come true for many net activists...

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
40. Underpaid?
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:56 PM
Sep 2012

Not according to the article:

Camden’s budget was $167 million last year, and of that, the budget for the police was $55 million. Yet the city collected only $21 million in property taxes. It has relied on state aid to make up the difference, but the state is turning off the spigot. The city has imposed furloughs, reduced salaries and trash collection, and increased fees. But the businesses the city desperately needs to attract to generate more revenue are scared off by the crime.

“We cannot move the city forward unless we address public safety,” the mayor, Dana L. Redd, said. “This is about putting boots on the ground.”

Even union officials acknowledge that the contract is rich with expensive provisions. For example, officers earn an additional 4 percent for working a day shift, and an additional 10 percent for the shift starting at 9:30 p.m. They earn an additional 11 percent for working on a special tactical force or an anticrime patrol.

Salaries range from about $47,000 to $81,000 now, not including the shift differentials or additional longevity payments of 3 percent to 11 percent for any officer who has worked five years or more. Officials say they anticipate salaries for the new force will range from $47,000 to $87,000.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
65. I really have no idea, I haven't made a study of police pay scales.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:02 PM
Sep 2012

But it seems pretty comparable to my military pay scale, albeit perhaps a larger starting salary.

I don't get overtime, or a shift incentive pay.

And I certainly don't get to have a union, so I'm rather ambiguous on that subject.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
39. I hope you mean that in a concerned way
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 10:53 PM
Sep 2012

it would be so disappointing if you were making a snide comment about my hometown at a sad time like this. Sad for Camden, sad for all of us.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
46. Thanks, I hope so too but
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 11:52 PM
Sep 2012

I'm not trying to steal the subject away from Camden; I feel bad for them right now. Your good wishes do you credit.

Warpy

(111,305 posts)
51. They'll get what they pay for
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:44 AM
Sep 2012

which is a bunch of green cops with no old timers around to guide them in dealing with the crap cops see every day and in how to keep a lid on their own behavior.

I wouldn't want to live in such a place.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
52. Most dangerous city in America, just got more dangerous.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:56 AM
Sep 2012

I am not even sure if this is an issue of money. By going non union it seems to me they will have officers working that have less pride in their work. Not that the current situation is good, it isn't not even by a long shot however I would lay odds that at least some of the current officers have pride in their jobs, the non union police, not so much.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
53. How necessary is Police Department?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 01:03 AM
Sep 2012

Where I live there have been lot's of "rationalizations" of Police Departments, which means that especially some small rural communities are very seldom visited by police officers.

For example there is a small island community of few hundred people which I know relatively well, and the locals tell me that when a police unit is coming, ferry informs and warns some locals and grapevine informs rest, so everyone knows e.g. to drive "orderly" to avoid trouble with police. I heard there was once a thief visiting the island, but locals did not bother to call police but just put the guy on ferry and made clear that it would be very bad idea to return. So it would seem that at least small tight communities where everybody knows everybody else don't much need police and don't want police outsiders bothering them.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
54. My experience with Camden cops is that they are a loutish, thuggish bunch.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 01:29 AM
Sep 2012

And I'm a middle-aged white guy.

Camden is a deindustrialization disaster area. What it needs is jobs.

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
57. True but like the article points out without a safer environment getting companies to
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 08:13 AM
Sep 2012

Last edited Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:00 AM - Edit history (1)

come in and invest in the area is difficult so they have to start somewhere.
Does it suck that its breaking a union? Sure but the members of the union shoulder alot of that blame themselves when you consider that they are having almost 30% of the force not showing up for work each day.

Edit: And to put it into perspective lets they have 200 officers scheduled to work during the day and 30% of them dont show up, thats a total of 60 less police officers which means only 140 are doing jobs meant to be done by 200. I dont know about you but to me its like those 60 are giving a big middle finger both to their fellow officers and to the tax payers.

FlaGranny

(8,361 posts)
58. Camden has been in severe
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 08:44 AM
Sep 2012

decline for as long as I can remember. I grew up 30 miles away. There is no longer any industry or jobs to speak of. The police have a tradition of corruption. The residents are extremely poor, the city has little tax revenue. Camden is a depressing sight.

Back in the 1960's the city/county tore down rotting buildings and built block after block of new low income rental housing. Within months, a drive through of those apartments showed that the residents were not taking care of their homes, yards full of garbage - nasty place. I imagine they deteriorated so badly that they have probably since been abandoned or torn down (just a guess).

The city is a complete drain on the surrounding county and the state, also, I'm sure. I hate to say it, but most of Camden should be razed to the ground, especially the building shells that stand abandoned and destroyed. They need factories and businesses, but who would want to build a factory or business in such a place?

The two gruesome murders of children mentioned above - I remember a gruesome murder of a 2-year-old many years ago. Died from suffocation when a parent forced the contents of a dirty diaper into the child's face and plugged his nose and mouth with feces. Lovely things take place in that town.

The cops in that town haven't been very effective in many, many years. I'm all for unions, but in this case, something really needs to be done. They need an entirely new city.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
63. Occupy Camden
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:13 AM
Sep 2012

Start with guerilla gardening to build community gardens. Seriously.

PS: googled "Camden community garden" - lot's of links to Camden Australia, but also this:
http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20120917/NEWS01/309170018/Community-gardens-help-change-Camden

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
66. I think something like that is the only real answer.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 12:44 PM
Sep 2012

The organs of the state (New Jersey, the US) have done nothing to help. Rather, US macroeconomic policies have turned the place into a sacrifice zone.

sweetapogee

(1,168 posts)
71. I know you mean well...
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 02:08 PM
Oct 2012

but "nothing to help?" Did you make this up on the fly or do you know something the whole rest of the east coast doesn't? There is this thing call reality, even in Democratic cities. And exactly which location in Camden would you propose we occupy for maximum publicity and effect? Are you thinking The Big J? Sounds like fun! Meet you on the poop deck.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»"Most Dangerous City...