Wisconsin Supreme Court blocks Evers' stay-home extension
Source: Washington Post
MADISON, Wis. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers administration overstepped its authority when it extended the governors stay-at-home order through the end of May, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
The 4-3 ruling marks a defeat for Evers as Republican legislators, in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic and with the aid of the conservative-controlled high court, continue to chip away at the Democratic governors powers.
Evers issued a stay-at-home order in March that closed schools and nonessential businesses. The closures battered the state economy, but Evers argued they were necessary to slow the virus spread. The order was supposed to lift on April 24, but Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Andrea Palm, an Evers appointee, extended it to May 26.
Republicans, worried about the economic fallout, asked the Supreme Court on April 21 to block the extension. The Republicans said Palm exceeded her authority and argued that the extension amounts to an administrative rule, requiring legislative approval.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/wisconsin-supreme-court-blocks-evers-stay-home-extension/2020/05/13/f67f1d58-9565-11ea-87a3-22d324235636_story.html
We have some major anti-life Republican assholes in Wisconsin.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)bluestarone
(17,004 posts)Up for election in NOV?
turbinetree
(24,710 posts)and there suppose to protect lives.................they just don't care...............libertarian assholes...........wheres that scott walker little asshole.........he has BLOOD ON HIS HANDS ALSO................right along with the other assholes that supported him every last one of them......
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)K&R!
Tech
(1,771 posts)of the way. I will be donating to whoever runs against Vos and Fitzgerald, the same geniuses who worked with Walker to get Foxconn here. They could teach classes in assholery.
LakeArenal
(28,830 posts)Dont forget Ron Johnson.
Should have been Russ Feingold.
Where is Russ these days? Hope Biden finds something for him. Hes a great, smart Dem.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Former Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold will soon lead the American Constitution Society, a progressive group of lawyers and legal scholars concerned with judicial nominations and justice issues.
Feingold, who has been teaching at a number of leading law schools in recent years, will take over as president of the Washington, D.C.-based organization March 9.
The organization's board of directors chose Feingold after a nationwide search.
The last few years have been very disturbing from a number of points of view, but particularly the attack on the rule of law that began before the current president and has been intensified under the current administration, Feingold said in an interview Wednesday.
Among other things, he cited what he called President Donald Trump's interference with the courts and Justice Department, as well as the refusal of Senate Republicans to take up President Barack Obama's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016, Judge Merrick Garland.
Feingold said the group will advance "progressive legal change" and work with not just progressives but moderates and conservatives in the legal world who believe this is a "crisis moment" and an "all hands on deck moment."
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/2020/02/26/sen-russ-feingold-takes-new-job-american-constitution-society/4876023002/
LakeArenal
(28,830 posts)Like all WI hes been screwed by Pukes.
Thekaspervote
(32,785 posts)Tech
(1,771 posts)Russ was great, I agree.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)I do not trust that Wisconsin Republicans care about the lives of Wisconsin citizens, period.
Thekaspervote
(32,785 posts)Only seeing about 30% of their regular amount of customer/shoppers.
30%.... ring a bell??!!
riversedge
(70,267 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,750 posts)and seriously gullible, un-informed voters.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)cp
(6,649 posts)The Wisconsin Republican legislators could not be bothered to do anything to help Wisconsiners survive Covid-19. Then they spend all their energy and our taxpayer money to sue the Secretary of Health (not confirmed--still--by them) who is doing everything she can for us. I despise their malevolence with a white hot fury.
pstokely
(10,530 posts)?
snacker
(3,619 posts)bluestarone
(17,004 posts)REMEMBER these names, and SUE the fuck out them if you get covid-19
Igel
(35,332 posts)Since it's the topic that everything else is commentary to.
Original order prescribing penalty:
https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/WIGOV/2020/04/16/file_attachments/1428995/EMO28-SaferAtHome.pdf
Statute it claims authority under:
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/252/25
Continuation order:
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/register/2020/772B/register/emergency_orders/phe_2020_emergency_order_31/phe_2020_emergency_order_31.pdf
Statute both of the order claim authority under:
https://casetext.com/statute/wisconsin-statutes/health/chapter-252-communicable-diseases/section-25202-powers-and-duties-of-department
https://casetext.com/statute/wisconsin-statutes/health/chapter-252-communicable-diseases/section-25202-powers-and-duties-of-department
(3) The department may close schools and forbid public gatherings in schools, churches, and other places to control outbreaks and epidemics. ...
(6) The department may authorize and implement all emergency measures necessary to control communicable diseases.
I read them and since I tend to think of government as having the least restrictive (meaning most restricted) authority, it sounds like it has specific places in mind--not the entire state for as long as somebody thinks. The powers are broad, so broad as to need some limit otherwise a lot of authority is given to a very few people.
But one should at least read it as a question of law, and not just "they're on the other team, so they're bad; this group's on my side, so whatever they want--hey, it's all good." Which is where the WaPo reporters tend to be mostly comfortable.
dickthegrouch
(3,182 posts)Should be a question for any prospective judge anywhere.
Are you willing to be subjected to the penalties forthcoming if you as a judge are found guilty of such a crime? Would be my next question.