Harvey Weinstein trial verdict: Guilty on two charges, acquitted on others
Source: Washington Post
Feb. 24, 2020 at 11:46 a.m. EST
BREAKING: Harvey Weinstein was found guilty on two charges and acquitted on others in the disgraced movie producer's New York sexual assault case.
Six sexual assault accusers testified against Weinstein, 67, at his trial in a Manhattan court. Weinsteins lawyers had argued that the women had consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer, hoping to get roles or other benefits.
Weinstein has been accused by dozens of women of sexual misconduct. He has a separate criminal case pending in Los Angeles.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/harvey-weinstein-trial-verdict/2020/02/24/057b9f36-5284-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Theres no doubt he did every single thing hes accused of.
2naSalit
(86,643 posts)Judge set them back to, apparently, water down the charges.
He still has a trial in Calif. to deal with soon.
former9thward
(32,017 posts)Juries can only determine guilty or not guilty on charges the prosecutors have given them. Period. They can't change charges. The number of men is irrelevant since the decisions were unanimous.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)We all should insist on a jury trial by our peers, and it's not like women were excluded. The prosecution team had the opportunity to reject jurors they didn't approve of, or jurors who they thought would be biased. This is a win, both for the state against Harvey Weinstein, the #MeToo movement, and for abused women everywhere.
Juries can't 'water down charges,' they can only find you guilty or not guilty.
And it's not like he got off scot free, he's going to be spending at least 10 years in jail for this.
spike jones
(1,679 posts)Skittles
(153,164 posts)yup
OnlinePoker
(5,721 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 24, 2020, 05:06 PM - Edit history (1)
If the prosecutors failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, that's on them, not the jury.
He was found not guilty of the most severe charge, predatory sexual assault, which would have acknowledged a pattern that included forcing sex on actress Annabella Sciorra in 1993 or 1994 and would have carried a sentence of 10 years to life in prison.
The top conviction count could yield up to 25 years in prison.
Grokenstein
(5,723 posts)For Harvey, 25 years would be a life sentence. (Not that he'll serve even a third of that. Won't somebody pleeeeeease think of the convicted rapist who is also a white guy?)
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)[link:https://mobile.twitter.com/AP/status/1231984962745794561|]
irisblue
(32,980 posts)Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) Tweeted:
2. And a reminder that Harvey Weinstein has been indicted on four counts of felony sexual assault in Los Angeles.
He faces those charges next
https://t.co/ezDrXulNam
Link to tweet
?s=20
jmbar2
(4,888 posts)I saw where the charges included that he used his size to force himself on the women. That helps explain the walker - trying to make himself look smaller and less imposing?
Rot in hell Harvey.
irisblue
(32,980 posts)Grokenstein
(5,723 posts)Does he condemn Weinstein and attempt to link him to "Hollywood liberal Democrats"?
Or does he sign a pardon for the piece of shit and award him a Medal of Freedom, while alternately laughing about sexual assault and crying about "witch hunts", in order to "trigger the libs" again?
Turbineguy
(37,337 posts)he was described as "a seminal figure"
Who writes this shit?
C Moon
(12,213 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 24, 2020, 06:29 PM - Edit history (1)
yardwork
(61,626 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)yardwork
(61,626 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)Can you believe this?!!!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213014452
Look at how he is walkingcompletely normal!
What a piece of garbage.
DenverJared
(457 posts)finally those victims will have closure
TexasBushwhacker
(20,192 posts)She was having a hard time not crying.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)He's actually more disgusting than Trump...a little.