Collins rejects new evidence in Trump trial after saying she'd welcome it
Source: American Independent
By Emily Singer -January 15, 2020 5:00 PM
Collins said in December that seeing the evidence in the case was necessary to determine whether Trump should be removed from office.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said on Wednesday she doesn't think newly released evidence, which happens to show Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump were deeply involved in the effort to force Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, should be allowed at the Senate impeachment trial.
"I wonder why the House did not put that into the record and it's only now being revealed," Collins said, referring to documents Democrats released on Tuesday from Lev Parnas, the indicted Giuliani aide who turned over his notes and text messages with Giuliani and other Ukrainian officials as part of the impeachment investigation.
Parnas only just released the documents to the House Intelligence Committee because federal authorities had seized them as part of its investigation into Parnas' political activity. Parnas was ultimately indicted for breaking federal campaign finance law.
When reporters reminded Collins of that fact that Parnas just released documents to House investigators yesterday, she replied, "Well, doesn't that suggest that the House did an incomplete job then?"
Read more: https://americanindependent.com/susan-collins-impeachment-trial-donald-trump-new-evidence-lev-parnas-rudy-giuliani-senate/
-snip-
If anyone had any doubts on which side of the fence this elected senator is on, then the fucking media needs to examine themselves for saying to the public that she would help and be fair and open and that she is up for reelection.........................that's because all the public has seen and heard ..................is BS from this enabling senator............................she is pulling her Kavanaugh BS again.................
November 3, 2020 cannot get here fast enough
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)turbinetree
(24,703 posts)aggiesal
(8,917 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,741 posts)Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,741 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Does she really think that (for example) keeping Lev Parnas out of the witness chair will stop us from hearing him?
Cat's out of the bag, Susie!
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)sandensea
(21,639 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,799 posts)She did not just become stupid. What made Maine vote her into office. Sorry, I just am mystified.
benld74
(9,904 posts)JDC
(10,129 posts)And needs to be voted out immediately.
ancianita
(36,074 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)to the Senate and her state.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)a Margaret Chase Smith AND a Susan Collins.
Southern Blueneck
(75 posts)Chemisse
(30,813 posts)Hopefully that will happen in the next election.
Hong Kong Cavalier
(4,573 posts)And when you're don fucking off, go fuck yourself.
chowder66
(9,073 posts)cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)yet again on her part and she has once again shows her true colors.
djacq
(1,634 posts)Vote her OUT!!
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)Vote her out!
MissMillie
(38,560 posts)She says she's "open to" looking at new evidence so that she can appear reasonable to liberals and moderates.
Then she rejects it so she can look loyal to the party of 45.
sdfernando
(4,935 posts)pretty much everyone on DU was right there with you.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts). I'm off to send an extra $5 to Sara Gideon right now
helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)Nitram
(22,813 posts)NCProgressive
(1,315 posts)Wishy-washy and manipulative with no real convictions.
I hope Ambassador Susan Rice runs against her and wins.