Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,245 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 07:55 PM Jan 2020

Pentagon official refutes Trump over list of '52 targets' in Iran: 'No list adds up to that number'

Source: raw story





Published 1 hour ago on January 5, 2020



A senior U.S. military official doesn’t appear to be aware of what President Donald Trump is talking about when he says there is a list of 52 Iranian targets he could strike.

On Twitter Saturday, Trump told Iran that he has a list that represents the 52 hostages taken during the crisis between 1979 and 1981. The locations are said to be cultural sites important to the Iranian people.


A TIME report on Iraq deciding to vote American soldiers out of the country, interviewed a U.S. military official who said he was unfamiliar with the list.

“There are different lists, depending on the nature of the possible targets — missile bases, nuclear facilities, naval bases, airfields, et cetera — but I don’t know of a list that adds up to that number or one that includes cultural or historic sites like Persepolis,” he said.

According to a CNN report, two senior officials said that there is “widespread opposition within the administration to targeting cultural sites in Iran,” if Trump decides to retaliate.
...............


Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/senior-us-military-official-has-no-idea-what-the-list-of-52-targets-are-that-trump-is-threatening-to-attack/



I am so glad the Pentagon is exposing lying dirty Trump!



?s=20
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon official refutes Trump over list of '52 targets' in Iran: 'No list adds up to that number' (Original Post) riversedge Jan 2020 OP
Guess who just ordered a drone strike on Persepolis. ZZenith Jan 2020 #1
Cultural sites sounds like he is going to intentionally kill civilians. Flaleftist Jan 2020 #2
And that would be a War Crime rickyhall Jan 2020 #9
Any order to strike somewhere - esp. any UNESCO World Heritage Site - should be subject to override ancianita Jan 2020 #3
He meant 57 Cartoonist Jan 2020 #4
Cultural sites... Would Jared approve bombing the Western Wall? Ivanka's daddy would. keithbvadu2 Jan 2020 #5
We spared cultural sites in WWII DBoon Jan 2020 #6
I'm confused...... Wuddles440 Jan 2020 #7
So we're going to start a war choie Jan 2020 #8
The '52' Tweet was by no accident... EarthFirst Jan 2020 #10
So....if its only 50 sites, Bayard Jan 2020 #11

ZZenith

(4,124 posts)
1. Guess who just ordered a drone strike on Persepolis.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 07:59 PM
Jan 2020

And guess who wasn’t even aware of its existence until Pentagon guy blabbed.

ancianita

(36,105 posts)
3. Any order to strike somewhere - esp. any UNESCO World Heritage Site - should be subject to override
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 08:15 PM
Jan 2020

by military brass.



keithbvadu2

(36,829 posts)
5. Cultural sites... Would Jared approve bombing the Western Wall? Ivanka's daddy would.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 08:51 PM
Jan 2020

Cultural sites... Would Jared approve bombing the Western Wall? Ivanka's daddy would.

DBoon

(22,372 posts)
6. We spared cultural sites in WWII
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 09:51 PM
Jan 2020

no matter how vile the Axis countries were, we spared historic, cultural, and religious sites as much as possible.

This puts Trump in the same league as the Taliban who dynamited ancient Buddhist monuments.

Wuddles440

(1,123 posts)
7. I'm confused......
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 09:51 PM
Jan 2020

isn't the destruction of cultural heritage sites right out of the ISIL playbook? Is our Dear Leader actually a member of ISIL or, at the very least, sympathetic to their cause? If so, how will Lindsey, Mitch, Hannity and the rest of the toadies spin this one?

EarthFirst

(2,900 posts)
10. The '52' Tweet was by no accident...
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 09:55 AM
Jan 2020

He’s ‘branding’ the effort to sell his war with a catchy; simple to remember ‘jingle’ for the demographic who cannot process journalism outside of 30-second clips of garbage.

Bayard

(22,103 posts)
11. So....if its only 50 sites,
Mon Jan 6, 2020, 11:55 AM
Jan 2020

Will they go ahead and bomb them?

You don't bomb cultural sites that would be full of ordinary citizens and tourists. Is The Hague the only power that will finally hold tRump accountable for his actions?

Military: Do not be complicit in war crimes!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon official refutes...