Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,631 posts)
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 05:03 PM Dec 2019

After bipartisan pushback, Trump ditches effort to kill major federal agency

Source: Washington Post

Politics
After bipartisan pushback, Trump ditches effort to kill major federal agency

By Lisa Rein and Josh Dawsey
Dec. 11, 2019 at 2:50 p.m. EST

President Trump has abandoned his administration’s faltering effort to dissolve a key federal agency, a major setback in his three-year battle to keep his campaign promise to make government leaner and more efficient.

The Office of Personnel Management will remain the human resources manager of the civilian workforce of 2.1 million employees and its functions will not — for the foreseeable future at least — be parceled out to the White House and the General Services Administration.

The White House hoped that shuttering the agency of 5,500 employees could serve as a blueprint for eliminating other federal offices as Trump tries to contain the size and scope of a bureaucracy he targeted as duplicative and inefficient — and rein in a workforce he views with skepticism.

But an 18-month effort by a top Office of Management and Budget official to eliminate the government personnel office left the plan on life support, despite a bipartisan consensus that the operation is deeply troubled.
....

[If Trump has his way, this major federal agency is on the way outl

Congressional Democrats and Republicans whose support was essential to disbanding the agency dismissed the plan as ill-conceived and unlikely to save money or shrink the federal workforce. A sweeping defense authorization bill that appears headed for approval on Capitol Hill on Wednesday relegates the breakup to an independent study committee, a common face-saving solution for ideas that tend to be going nowhere.

The agency would have been the first stand-alone federal department of its size to be eliminated in decades.
....

Lisa Rein covers federal agencies and the management of government in the Trump adminstration. At The Washington Post, she has written about the federal workforce; state politics and government in Annapolis, and in Richmond; local government in Fairfax County, Va. and the redevelopment of Washington and its neighborhoods. Follow https://twitter.com/Reinlwapo

Josh Dawsey is a White House reporter for The Washington Post. He joined the paper in 2017. He previously covered the White House for Politico, and New York City Hall and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for the Wall Street Journal. Follow https://twitter.com/jdawsey1

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/after-bipartisan-pushback-trump-ditches-effort-to-kill-major-federal-agency/2019/12/11/bbce1c10-16d8-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html



Wednesday, April 10, 2019:

Trump on track to dismantle the Office of Personnel Management

https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100211999177
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After bipartisan pushback, Trump ditches effort to kill major federal agency (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2019 OP
DAMN good thing!!! elleng Dec 2019 #1
WTF BumRushDaShow Dec 2019 #2
Yeah, "..reduce gov.. " Leave a million or more jobless while Cha Dec 2019 #13
Since I am a federal retiree BumRushDaShow Dec 2019 #14
omg.. that must be so Cha Dec 2019 #15
Yup BumRushDaShow Dec 2019 #16
Very true I needed info for my mom marlakay Dec 2019 #19
My dad was a federal employee BumRushDaShow Dec 2019 #20
Jared really can't handle Lindsay Dec 2019 #3
GOOD! 50 Shades Of Blue Dec 2019 #4
Ditto elleng Dec 2019 #6
"and rein in a workforce he views with skepticism."? chriscan64 Dec 2019 #5
"make government leaner and more efficient" bucolic_frolic Dec 2019 #7
Yes. It's the old Grover Norquist plan. Lonestarblue Dec 2019 #8
They really don't want to reduce.... Wuddles440 Dec 2019 #10
"Grover"'s quote was my first thought as well... Drumpf talks about scum (FBI). The scum was already Evolve Dammit Dec 2019 #12
Good not fooled Dec 2019 #9
Another incredibly ill concieved Trump Administration plan falls by the wayside. Sloumeau Dec 2019 #11
The purpose of this merger was to politicize the Civil Service. NutmegYankee Dec 2019 #17
Trump can't spell duplicative! n/t TheFourthMind Dec 2019 #18

elleng

(131,159 posts)
1. DAMN good thing!!!
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 05:05 PM
Dec 2019

'The Office of Personnel Management will remain the human resources manager of the civilian workforce of 2.1 million employees and its functions will not — for the foreseeable future at least — be parceled out to the White House and the General Services Administration.'

Cha

(297,733 posts)
13. Yeah, "..reduce gov.. " Leave a million or more jobless while
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 08:41 PM
Dec 2019

putin's doormats suck the treasury dry.

Thank you for that appropriate pic, BRDS.

BumRushDaShow

(129,563 posts)
14. Since I am a federal retiree
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 08:49 PM
Dec 2019

OPM also handles all the retirees and survivors -including processing/managing/issuing the retirement annuities (and generating the annuity statements as well as managing any changes in withholdings), plus they send out the 1099Rs for tax purposes, etc.

Cha

(297,733 posts)
15. omg.. that must be so
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 09:07 PM
Dec 2019

stressful and scary for you all depending on the whim of a maniac.

I know how stressed out I got when he shut down the gov for so damn long.

BumRushDaShow

(129,563 posts)
16. Yup
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 09:17 PM
Dec 2019

and I still have friends and relatives working in the federal government - and as it is, the current Continuing Resolution only goes until December 20 so there needs to either be an extension or passage of some Omnibus appropriations for FY2020 or there will be another shutdown.

marlakay

(11,498 posts)
19. Very true I needed info for my mom
Thu Dec 12, 2019, 03:43 AM
Dec 2019

About money she gets from my dad and he was retired government and I ended up on that site.

After setting up online account got all the info I needed.

BumRushDaShow

(129,563 posts)
20. My dad was a federal employee
Thu Dec 12, 2019, 05:37 AM
Dec 2019

who unfortunately had died while still on the job 45 years ago, thus my mother received his survivor's annuity. So OPM has been in my life for my entire life! They processed my retirement and had my final monthly annuity amount (vs "estimated" ) completed within 4 months after my agency provided them the retirement package.

This mentality that they have to remake the federal government into a "business" despite the fact that the number of employees who make up the federal government, dwarfs that of the largest businesses in the U.S., is sickening. The "government" is not out to make a profit like a business, so every "business practice" does not apply to how the government should be remade to function.

OPM is the "Human Resources" agency for the federal government and deals with "people". GSA oversees pretty much all the other services needed to support the federal government like facilities management, fleet management, telecommunications management, and large multi-year federal contract management. Trying to combine the two is insane.

chriscan64

(1,789 posts)
5. "and rein in a workforce he views with skepticism."?
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 05:18 PM
Dec 2019

Funny, they view him with skepticism too. Partisan Democrats and non-partisan career government workers all seem to agree Trump is incompetent. In Trump's little mind, not partisan for him equals partisan against him.

bucolic_frolic

(43,321 posts)
7. "make government leaner and more efficient"
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 05:33 PM
Dec 2019

honestly the assumptions these journalists accept and spew out is legendary and annoying.

He means 'like a skeleton and ineffective'

Lonestarblue

(10,088 posts)
8. Yes. It's the old Grover Norquist plan.
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 06:00 PM
Dec 2019

Reduce the federal government to the size where you can drown it in a bathtub. How these idiots think you can run a country with around 330 million people with very few government employees is beyond me.

Wuddles440

(1,127 posts)
10. They really don't want to reduce....
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 06:43 PM
Dec 2019

the size (spending) of the federal government only the number of civil servants and their employment rules/regulations. It's all about getting tax dollars into private/for profit entities. Expanded patronage, more contractors, less accountability and transparency. The wet dream of all fascists.

Evolve Dammit

(16,778 posts)
12. "Grover"'s quote was my first thought as well... Drumpf talks about scum (FBI). The scum was already
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 08:31 PM
Dec 2019

part of the GOP "deep state" swamp.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
9. Good
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 06:41 PM
Dec 2019

666koch666 plan hits a road block. Old money-hoarding fossil fuel billionaire John Bircher thwarted in one of his evil aims.

These radical crackpots neither understand nor care what Federal employees do. The ones that aren't essential to extracting more $$$$$$ from 'Muricans are nonessential, in their warped minds.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
17. The purpose of this merger was to politicize the Civil Service.
Wed Dec 11, 2019, 11:18 PM
Dec 2019

Make no mistake, I see many trumpzis who call for dismissing every registered Democrat from the Civil Service.

Step one was bring the federal workforce directly under White House control.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»After bipartisan pushback...