Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
NEW timeline in D.C. Circuit case over Trump's accounting records:
Source: Ann Marimow, Washington Post
NEW timeline in D.C. Circuit case over Trump's accounting records:
If the court refuses to take up the case as a full en banc panel, Trump's lawyers will have seven days to seek review from SCOTUS.
Read more:
Link to tweet
I know, Twitter's no good for LBN. Someone will have an article about this.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1983 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NEW timeline in D.C. Circuit case over Trump's accounting records: (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2019
OP
Sorry. I was too fast on the trigger and too lazy on the confirmation process. :) n/t
Cerridwen
Nov 2019
#3
Cerridwen
(13,260 posts)1. Not current: From October for background. WaPo link and 4 paragraphs.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/appeals-court-rules-against-trump-in-fight-with-congress-over-presidents-accounting-firm-records/2019/10/11/42933894-b9ea-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html
Congress can seek eight years of President Trumps business records from his accounting firm, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled Friday in one of several legal battles over access to the presidents financial data.
In a 2-to-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld Congresss broad investigative powers and rejected the presidents bid to block lawmakers from subpoenaing the documents.
That three-judge panels ruling is a significant victory for the Democratic-led House, but it will not result in the House obtaining Trumps tax returns at least, not immediately.
The House agreed to hold off on enforcing the subpoenas while Trumps appeal is pending. Trump could keep it pending for weeks or months by appealing the case to the full D.C. Circuit.
<snip to rest at link above>
Sorry for misfire.
Congress can seek eight years of President Trumps business records from his accounting firm, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled Friday in one of several legal battles over access to the presidents financial data.
In a 2-to-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld Congresss broad investigative powers and rejected the presidents bid to block lawmakers from subpoenaing the documents.
That three-judge panels ruling is a significant victory for the Democratic-led House, but it will not result in the House obtaining Trumps tax returns at least, not immediately.
The House agreed to hold off on enforcing the subpoenas while Trumps appeal is pending. Trump could keep it pending for weeks or months by appealing the case to the full D.C. Circuit.
<snip to rest at link above>
Sorry for misfire.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,613 posts)2. That's from October. I saw it linked in the tweet.
This new wrinkle happened this morning. There will be an article later today.
Thanks.
Cerridwen
(13,260 posts)3. Sorry. I was too fast on the trigger and too lazy on the confirmation process. :) n/t
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)4. I'm baffled by the legalese and triple/quadruple negatives
Does this mean SCROTUS will rescue Trump sooner, or later?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,613 posts)5. It's too soon to tell.
I'm still hoping someone writes an article about this. It seems like an important development to me.