Trump's Justice Department Asks Judge to Block Subpoena for His Tax Returns
Source: New York Times
The Justice Department on Wednesday asked a federal judge to temporarily block a subpoena from the Manhattan district attorney that would require President Trump to turn over eight years of his personal and corporate tax returns. Mr. Trump has been fighting off an attempt by the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., to obtain his tax returns as it investigates hush-money payments made to the pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels.
After the subpoena was sent in late August, Mr. Trumps lawyers made a sweeping and untested argument that a sitting president cannot be subjected to a criminal investigation, especially by local prosecutors. In its filing, Mr. Trumps own Justice Department did not say whether it agreed with his position that presidents cannot be investigated. But citing significant constitutional issues raised by the presidents lawyers, the department said the court should stop enforcement of the subpoena while it takes time to consider the case.
The Justice Department is not part of the case but had told the judge it wanted to offer an opinion because of the importance of the constitutional questions. The departments lawyers argued in the filing that a delay would not hurt Mr. Vances investigation but would prevent the irreparable harm they argued the president would suffer if he had to comply with the demand to turn over his tax returns and other financial information before his case was considered.
A spokesman for Mr. Vance could not immediately be reached for comment.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/nyregion/trump-taxes-lawsuit.html
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)that we may not be actually voting?
Well, probably most of DU was suspicious.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,743 posts)PSPS
(13,603 posts)cstanleytech
(26,295 posts)the Constitution from conducting an investigation over the actions by a sitting President.
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)Beyond the judicial and legal whoring around by DOJ, it also tinkles me off no end that it's such a waste of OUR taxpayer dollars, all going down the MF45 shitzitter.
/rant
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)In this particular law suit? And why are the taxpayers picking up the tab for DOJ lawyers.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)but it's all a matter of trying to throw up roadblocks any way they can.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Just a bunch of mobbed up made men swinging their dicks around.
Hal Zerozerozeronine
(76 posts)NotHardly
(1,062 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)The US Supreme Court ruled in that case that a sitting president can be sued for acts he (or she) committed before becoming president. This would apply to Trump since most of these acts occurred before Nov 2016. 8 years of tax returns would cover 2010-2018.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)involving the protesters and an incident in 2015 between themselves and Drumpf's security detail, has been moving forward.
But here is an example of the media preferring to chase debunked GOP conspiracy theories and not follow up on some of these active cases (it's been difficult finding any updates on that case since the end of September and the supposed jury seating on the 26th).
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)Maddow covers a lot of the lawsuits. I suppose Melber might want to delve into that case, too, since he's MSNBC's legal beagle.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)His actions should have been enough, already.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)It is not a Constitutional question.
Delmette2.0
(4,166 posts)"irreparable harm to the president. The pResident is hiding a lot of something and they are helping.