Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:15 PM Aug 2019

Trump says Ratcliffe is no longer his pick for director of national intelligence

Source: CNN

(CNN)President Donald Trump says Rep. John Ratcliffe will no longer be nominated as director of national intelligence to replace Dan Coats.

"Our great Republican Congressman John Ratcliffe is being treated very unfairly by the LameStream Media," Trump wrote on Twitter.

"Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people John has therefore decided to stay in Congress where he has done such an outstanding job representing the people of Texas, and our Country. I will be announcing my nomination for DNI shortly."

Trump privately voiced concern in recent days about Ratcliffe's ability to be confirmed as the next director of national intelligence, according to two people who spoke with him. Trump had been assured by allies before selecting Ratcliffe that he would be an easy pick, and so the president was surprised when Ratcliffe started facing issues from senators who had their own concerns.

This story is breaking and will be updated

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/02/politics/trump-ratcliffe-dni/index.html



Here are the tweets:





33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says Ratcliffe is no longer his pick for director of national intelligence (Original Post) George II Aug 2019 OP
Wow. not fooled Aug 2019 #1
Considering it's Trump, you get three guesses, and your first two don't count. n/t woodsprite Aug 2019 #2
Hair Fuhrer Sane Floridian Aug 2019 #22
I feel creepy if I start reading any of the responses pecosbob Aug 2019 #3
Golly gee whiz. Wellstone ruled Aug 2019 #4
No matter what the issue, Trump resorts to gaslighting. madaboutharry Aug 2019 #5
Obviously he has a lot of gas to pass. sheshe2 Aug 2019 #18
If he can't stand the heat, get him out of the kitchen. Think sinkingfeeling Aug 2019 #6
Please bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #14
Make bank it will be someone worse Watchfoxheadexplodes Aug 2019 #7
Translation. He just got off the phone with McConnell. GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #8
He was too qualified. Turbineguy Aug 2019 #9
"Rather than going through months of slander and libel...." Hortensis Aug 2019 #10
He broke Rule #1 - "Nobody can brag more than Donald Trump" dalton99a Aug 2019 #11
LOL@Ratcliffe. Nt BootinUp Aug 2019 #12
Wonder which allies assured him Ratcliffe Phoenix61 Aug 2019 #13
Aw, Trumpy's feelings got hurt by the LameStream Media. Astraea Aug 2019 #15
Ratcliiffe wasn't corrupt enough? jmowreader Aug 2019 #16
Returning my case of unopened popcorn to COSTCO. oasis Aug 2019 #17
He can't tolerate the failure of Republican senators voting Ratcliffe down vlyons Aug 2019 #19
Bingo! (nt) Chrysanthemum Aug 2019 #21
The "LameStream Media" had nothing to do with it. Ratcliffe is UNQUALIFIED, plain and simple. nt iluvtennis Aug 2019 #20
Yes, Ratcliffe is unqualified. So what? JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2019 #24
Blames the media for his unqualified bootlicker. keithbvadu2 Aug 2019 #23
What a childish response from a President. llmart Aug 2019 #25
Rump knows all the best people. He hires all the best. Mc Mike Aug 2019 #26
This is one sentence with two commas underpants Aug 2019 #27
Mulvaney gets replaced in 3..2..1.. Ilsa Aug 2019 #28
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL pangaia Aug 2019 #29
Washington Post opinion: "Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one." mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2019 #30
Since when has he let the media stop him from doing anything? Cirque du So-What Aug 2019 #31
So, then,,, hehhhh....GOPers don't have to think about keeping the district (R)ed Mersky Aug 2019 #32
They are scraping the bottom of the bottom of the bottom... Ford_Prefect Aug 2019 #33

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
1. Wow.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:19 PM
Aug 2019

Was the opprobrium too much even for Hair Fuhrer?

Now the question is: will the next name put forth be someone worse or someone better?

Always an issue with this joker.




 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. Golly gee whiz.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:23 PM
Aug 2019

Used a word salad of a half time Governor and failed VP candidate . Lamestreammedia. Golllllyy.

madaboutharry

(40,216 posts)
5. No matter what the issue, Trump resorts to gaslighting.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:24 PM
Aug 2019

It wasn't the fact that Trump was pressured into withdrawing Radcliffe's nomination because Radcliffe is a fraud, a liar, and woefully unqualified, no....Trump has to blame "The LameStream Media" for being so mean.

Dear Democratic Presidential Candidates, Please keep focused on what really matters. Thank You, madaboutharry.

sinkingfeeling

(51,468 posts)
6. If he can't stand the heat, get him out of the kitchen. Think
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:27 PM
Aug 2019

about how the GOP treated Hillary and Mueller.

The Fat One knows even his party would reject Ratcliffe.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
8. Translation. He just got off the phone with McConnell.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:32 PM
Aug 2019

And was told no. The intelligence committee was not going to vote him thru.

Expect an explosion in a few hours.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. "Rather than going through months of slander and libel...."
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:35 PM
Aug 2019

I imagine it was actually half an hour of hard truths and then the rest of the time angrily storming and fighting reality presented by various individuals and delegations before giving in.

Phoenix61

(17,009 posts)
13. Wonder which allies assured him Ratcliffe
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:43 PM
Aug 2019

would be an easy pick? Guess it will be the one who needs to spend more time with his family.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,356 posts)
24. Yes, Ratcliffe is unqualified. So what?
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:12 PM
Aug 2019

It had to be something else that caused Trump to drop Ratcliffe. "Unqualified" would not affect Trump's decision process.

llmart

(15,545 posts)
25. What a childish response from a President.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:14 PM
Aug 2019

"Lamestream Media" - Really? What are you? Ten years old?

Honestly, I don't know how much more of this embarrassment I can take.

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
26. Rump knows all the best people. He hires all the best.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:18 PM
Aug 2019

Also, I'm sure the evil lamestream media isn't going to put the replacement nominee through 'months of slander and libel and make things miserable for them and their family'. This was a one-off.

underpants

(182,849 posts)
27. This is one sentence with two commas
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:20 PM
Aug 2019

Rather than going through months of slander and libel, I explained to John how miserable it would be for him and his family to deal with these people John has therefore decided to stay in Congress where he has done such an outstanding job representing the people of Texas, and our Country.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
28. Mulvaney gets replaced in 3..2..1..
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:38 PM
Aug 2019

Mulvaney picked Ratcliffe when he should have picked a sure-thing like Rep. Will Hurd.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,547 posts)
30. Washington Post opinion: "Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one."
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 04:44 PM
Aug 2019
The Plum Line • Opinion

Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one.

By Paul Waldman and Greg Sargent
August 2 at 4:13 PM

Well, that certainly didn’t take long:

President Trump announced Friday that Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), his embattled pick to lead the nation’s intelligence community, was withdrawing from consideration and would remain in Congress.

The lawmaker was facing intense questions about padding his résumé and a lack of experience, which led to a lukewarm reception on Capitol Hill.

Trump said he would announce a new pick for director of national intelligence shortly.

In tweets, Trump said that Ratcliffe was being treated “very unfairly” by the media.

The fault, as always, lies with Trump’s opponents and the media. The “unfair” treatment to which Trump refers was likely this story in The Post, which showed that Ratcliffe’s claims about his experience were seriously exaggerated.

Ratcliffe had asserted that “as a U.S. Attorney, I arrested over 300 illegal immigrants on a single day.” But that was false: He didn’t arrest them; the relevant operation ended up charging only 45 poultry workers with low-level offenses; and people involved in it “could not recall Ratcliffe playing a central role.”

This comes after stories showing that his claims to have tried terrorism cases were also inflated.

The office of DNI has only existed since 2005, and before Trump’s election had been filled by people with long careers of service in the military, the intelligence world or both. President George W. Bush appointed Mike McConnell, a Navy vice admiral who had been the director of the National Security Agency. President Barack Obama appointed James R. Clapper Jr., an Air Force lieutenant general who had run the Defense Intelligence Agency.

But those claims of Ratcliffe’s work stoppin’ terrorists and ropin’ illegals were almost the entirety of his qualifications for the job, other than six months sitting on the House Intelligence Committee.
....

Paul Waldman is an opinion writer for the Plum Line blog. Follow https://twitter.com/paulwaldman1

Greg Sargent writes The Plum Line blog. He joined The Post in 2010, after stints at Talking Points Memo, New York Magazine and the New York Observer. Follow https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs

Cirque du So-What

(25,953 posts)
31. Since when has he let the media stop him from doing anything?
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 06:07 PM
Aug 2019

More likely, some dirt has been found that is too egregious to overlook.

Mersky

(4,986 posts)
32. So, then,,, hehhhh....GOPers don't have to think about keeping the district (R)ed
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 08:44 PM
Aug 2019

Texas already has three Rs not running for reelection. tRumpers need to be able to ride on incumbencies like ratcliffe's. This way they won't have to shuffle, launder, lavish or rathole money around the state as much for the open seats. Perhaps won't get as many questions about income disparity in the 4th district, or current states of its superfund sites, etc.

I'll breathe a little easier until the next unqualified, partisaned-to-hell hack is nominated for DNI.

Ford_Prefect

(7,914 posts)
33. They are scraping the bottom of the bottom of the bottom...
Sun Aug 4, 2019, 09:37 AM
Aug 2019

and Moscow Mitch will sing the praises of anyone willing to show up for the job.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says Ratcliffe is n...