Obama rips Romney over China
Source: USA Today
CINCINNATI -- While announcing a new trade complaint against China, President Obama also plans to rip Republican rival Mitt Romney while he's at it.
"I understand my opponent has been running around Ohio claiming he's going to roll up his sleeves and take the fight to China," Obama plans to say in Cincinnati, according to excerpts released by the campaign.
"But here's the thing," the president plans to add about Romney: "His experience has been owning companies that were called 'pioneers' in the business of outsourcing jobs to countries like China. Pioneers! Ohio, you can't stand up to China when all you've done is send them our jobs."
Romney and aides called the new trade complaint -- over Chinese subsidies to its auto parts industry -- a politically motivated act designed to appeal to the politically pivotal state of Ohio.
Read more: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/09/17/obama-rips-romney-over-china/70000509/1
goclark
(30,404 posts)Sock it to him!
Botany
(70,504 posts)Obama's answer
&feature=player_embedded
radhika
(1,008 posts)For another perspective on jobs and trade, read this article by Kevin Zeese via Truthout.org
http://truth-out.org/news/item/11563-obama-says-one-thing-in-spotlight-another-behind-closed-doors
AdHocSolver
(2,561 posts)(snip)
Neither candidate is arguing for a New Deal style government jobs program. Both are relying on private industry to create jobs. But, big business profits by spending less on labor. While in the spotlight of the convention, Obama is critical of jobs being sent overseas but at the same time his U.S. trade representative, Ron Kirk, who works out of the executive office of the president, is negotiating a secret treaty behind closed doors the Trans-Pacific Partnership known as 'NAFTA on steroids'. This is a corporate trade agreement that will result in massive outsourcing of jobs.
(snip)
The TPP is building on a corporate court system that has been developing in other trade agreements but the TPP goes further by giving corporations the right to sue governments. The impact of these trade tribunals has already been significant, as Global Trade Watch reports: "Over $350 million in compensation has already been paid out to foreign investors in a series of investor-state cases under NAFTA-style deals. This includes attacks on natural resource policies, environmental protection and health and safety measures, and more. In fact, of the over $12.5 billion in the 17 pending claims under NAFTA-style deals, all relate to environmental, public health and transportation policy not traditional trade issues." Thus foreign firms will have an advantage over domestic corporations that have to pay to obey environmental and other laws. This will make competition impossible and result in making laws designed to protect the environment, workers and consumers more difficult to enact.
(snip)
One recent notorious case involved a judgment of an international tribunal convened under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty. The trade tribunal ordered Ecuador to stop enforcement of an $18-billion judgment against Chevron to pay for three decades of pollution in the Ecuadorian Amazon. This is one example of how unaccountable corporate panels, from which no outside appeal is available, empower corporations to skirt real courts. The TPP entrenches laws that have already undermined consumer health and safety policies, environmental and land-use laws, government procurement decisions, regulatory permits, intellectual property, financial regulation, and more.
http://truth-out.org/news/item/11563-obama-says-one-thing-in-spotlight-another-behind-closed-doors
pampango
(24,692 posts)Chinese officials strongly criticized Mr. Obama last winter for not blocking solar panel trade cases against China, accusing him of playing politics with trade. But as Mr. Romney has called for a more confrontational trade policy toward China, the state media have become highly critical in recent weeks of Mr. Romney as well.
It is rather ironic that a considerable portion of this China-battering politicians wealth was actually obtained by doing business with Chinese companies before he entered politics, Xinhua, the state-run news agency, said in a commentary Friday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/business/global/us-files-wto-case-against-china-over-cars.html?pagewanted=all
bucolic_frolic
(43,162 posts)for being one of the fiercest political competitors and most ferocious
campaigners of all time.
He's jabbing the Romney campaign every other day. This will
crescendo into a pummeling by late October.
Then Obama will step on the gas, like he did to Hillary Clinton,
like he did to John McCain.
The only unforeseen is if Joe Biden has a senior moment.
But I have the sense that Biden has learned his lessons
and is improving with wisdom.
Should be able to handle Ayn Rand Paul Ryan.