Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,035 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 12:54 PM Jun 2019

Hicks told House panel Trump is serious about foreign help in elections

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON - Hope Hicks, a once close aide to President Donald Trump, told the House Judiciary Committee that Trump was serious in saying there was nothing wrong in accepting derogatory information about political opponents from a foreign government, panel Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on Thursday.

"Ms. Hicks made clear that she understood the president to be serious when he said that he would accept foreign interference in our elections," Nadler said in a statement for a hearing on former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

"She also made clear that even she knew that such foreign assistance should be rejected and reported to the FBI," he said.

Hicks, who was Trump's campaign press secretary and his White House communications director, spent eight hours in a closed-door committee hearing on Wednesday. But she refused to answer questions about her 14-month White House tenure after administration attorneys said she was immune from testifying on the topic.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hicks-told-house-panel-trump-is-serious-about-foreign-help-in-elections/ar-AADaxnp?li=BBnb7Kz

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hicks told House panel Trump is serious about foreign help in elections (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP
Was there ever any doubt? nt trev Jun 2019 #1
I don't understand how these people are immune from testifying. Arkansas Granny Jun 2019 #2
there is no "immunity" from testimony UpInArms Jun 2019 #3
She was both. She was employed by the campaign and then by the administration. hedda_foil Jun 2019 #4
She isn't -- there is literally no such thing as aboslute immunity obamanut2012 Jun 2019 #8
so, nations are gearing up and looking for smut to get favor from Trump. damn, we riversedge Jun 2019 #5
She ... knew that such foreign assistance should be rejected and reported to the FBI" mpcamb Jun 2019 #6
I suppose she couldn't plead the fifth Harker Jun 2019 #7
Of course he is Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #9

Arkansas Granny

(31,518 posts)
2. I don't understand how these people are immune from testifying.
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 12:58 PM
Jun 2019

Was she a federal employee or was she employed by Trump privately? If she received a check from the government, she needs to answer the damned questions.

UpInArms

(51,284 posts)
3. there is no "immunity" from testimony
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:03 PM
Jun 2019

there can be "immunity" from prosecution, but that is subject to the court's approval.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
5. so, nations are gearing up and looking for smut to get favor from Trump. damn, we
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:18 PM
Jun 2019

are in trouble--our Nation is in trouble

mpcamb

(2,871 posts)
6. She ... knew that such foreign assistance should be rejected and reported to the FBI"
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 10:45 PM
Jun 2019

That alone should land her ass in jail.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hicks told House panel Tr...