Moon Landing by Israel's Beresheet Spacecraft Appears to End in Crash
Source: New York Times
A small spacecraft that has captured the imagination and excitement of people in Israel and around the world appears to have crashed on the moon.
We have a failure of the spacecraft, said Opher Doron, the general manager of Israel Aerospace Industries space division, which collaborated on building the spacecraft. The mood at the control center was somber but still celebratory.
Well we didn't make it, but we definitely tried, said Morris Kahn, an Israeli telecommunications entrepreneur and president of SpaceIL, the nonprofit that undertook the mission. I think we can be proud.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who attended the event at the missions command center in Yehud, Israel, said, If at first you dont succeed, you try again.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/science/israel-moon-landing-beresheet.html
אאוץ
Mosby
(16,319 posts)I read it was a pretty tricky maneuver.
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)Agree with you it is a shame. I would think global pollution/waste would be the best bang for any research buck. The fact that PM Ben 'yahu supports it that much makes me wonder if he isn't trying to colonize the moon.
Mosby
(16,319 posts)I think there were some research projects that were planned. Israel has a fair amount of experience with satellites, they have been sending up different types for years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Space_Agency
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)I will check it out.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"I would think global pollution/waste would be the best bang for any research buck..."
You can of course, y'know... show some initiative and begin a project. The only person preventing you from doing so is yourself.
Or you can simply complain about moon colonization.
(I get it though... one isn't very convenient or easy to do, the other is).
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)I have and both of my children have - one started an award winning green club at her elementary school. I will give your complaint the consideration it merits. I will plant another tree in my backyard this weekend. Maybe a Chilean Lantern tree.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)Subscript (available below the comic by pressing the red button; later years he included mouseover comments as well)
Too preachy.
Your complaint won't save the whales.
People *really* need to stop with the "Why are we spending money on X when we should be doing Y?" nonsense when it comes to science because it is terribly naive. Science funding isn't a zero sum game. Not all scientists are qualified to work in all fields. Developments and insights from one field can have cross-field application. Then there's the not-small matter of we may need to figure out how to live off-world if it appears the Earth is going to become Human-inhospitable if our species it to survive. We can actually research more than one thing at a time. Be grateful that there are people who dedicate their lives to a particular field of study. Their work might not impact you directly, then again it might. Science is deep, complex, and vast and there are millions of people working to explore it in all its facets. To pick going to Luna as an example, it could become a source of plentiful off-world fuel mined from the regolith, and it gives a nearby test bed for methods of long-term off-world missions to Mars, the Belt and beyond in addition to the research missions already being conducted by deep space probes or Earthbound telescopy.
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)That was part of my point. What do we need moon travel for? Infant mortality rates are ridiculous for this time in history. How about putting more money into saving babies' lives who probably wouldn't benefit from moon fuel? Funny how the brunette haired lady in the cartoon above is portrayed as closed minded and unable to discuss the issue she goes right to an emotional place and can't discuss it further.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)You read I wrote and took away almost none of it or dismissed it outright. I'm reminded of this gal:
https://boingboing.net/2007/09/19/cohost-of-the-view-d.html
Again, not all scientists are qualified to work in your chosen fields for them based on what you feel is or is not important. A paleontologist is not going to get a job as a biochemist. An astronomer isn't going to get a job studying cancer. A rocket scientist isn't going to work as a child psychologist. Funding for science isn't a zero sum game, so if one field gets money another doesn't. You may not personally benefit from something but then again you might. You may be too busy to concern yourself with a certain thing, but millions of others dedicate their lives to its study for the advancement of all science and the benefits that flow from that.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,393 posts)If he tries, he will be met with the biggliest, mightiest Space Force in the galaxy.
Response to ArizonaLib (Reply #3)
3Hotdogs This message was self-deleted by its author.
JI7
(89,252 posts)are interested in colonizing the moon.
why do you have a problem with science and research ?
alfredo
(60,074 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)The craft is still intact. Sideways, but intact.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Ligyron
(7,636 posts)They'll keep working at it. Israel never gives up until they are successful. They really have no choice, it's a tuff neighborhood.
mac2766
(658 posts)Shame on you.
What have we become?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)We won't all die, but it will impact menstrual cycles.
I remember watching some crazy youtube videos leading up to the LCROSS mission.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Damned chemtrails
Okay, thats some funny shit right there.
Care to identify just whom you are talking about?
machoneman
(4,007 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)This was done by a private, non-profit organization competing for Google's prize money for the first private landing on the moon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceIL
still_one
(92,242 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)Well, yes. But also on the moon.