Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,898 posts)
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 08:22 AM Mar 2019

Trump inauguration took money from shell companies tied to foreigners

Source: The Guardian

Donald Trump’s inauguration received tens of thousands of dollars from shell companies that masked the involvement of a foreign contributor or others with foreign ties.

The Guardian has identified the creators of three obscure firms that contributed money to Trump’s inaugural committee, which collected a record $107m as he entered the White House in 2017.

The three companies each gave $25,000 to Trump’s inaugural fund. At least one of the contributions was made for a foreign national who appears ineligible to make political donations in the US.

A spokesman for Thomas Barrack, the chairman of Trump’s inauguration committee, declined to comment. The contributors denied wrongdoing.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/08/trump-inauguration-money-shell-companies-revealed

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump inauguration took money from shell companies tied to foreigners (Original Post) demmiblue Mar 2019 OP
where it came from is a good question KayF Mar 2019 #1
So if Congress has a hearing on this, greymattermom Mar 2019 #2
Just cut to the chase Dems duforsure Mar 2019 #3
Couldn't agree more. Firestorm49 Mar 2019 #4
Isn't that the whole intent behind the Citizen's United case... IthinkThereforeIAM Mar 2019 #5
So what, right? It's only illegal. No big deal. Firestorm49 Mar 2019 #6

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
2. So if Congress has a hearing on this,
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 08:54 AM
Mar 2019

all of these folks will have to explain where the money came from or lie to Congress. Either way, they're in serious trouble.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
3. Just cut to the chase Dems
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 09:06 AM
Mar 2019

Start demanding a Special "Commission" giving it the ability to do anything it needs to expose all forms of corruption now infiltrating OUR government from putin and trump, and any Dems also. Its to big not to do this now.

Firestorm49

(4,037 posts)
4. Couldn't agree more.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:20 AM
Mar 2019

My passionate curiosity about Manafort’s work with the Russians is turning into disallusionment. As you stated, we appear to be at a standstill. Will the pending SDNY case be based on conspiracy, collusion, or is it another case of fraud that shields the Goof Ball In Chief of wrong doing? Honestly, this all has gone on long enough. Maybe Mueller or Barr would prefer that the investigation fizzle out for whatever reason - as if we the public couldn’t handle the truth, or, and it’s a big “or”, there is nothing criminal to be revealed. There certainly has been no shortage of stupidity emanating from the Black House. This thing needs to end.

IthinkThereforeIAM

(3,077 posts)
5. Isn't that the whole intent behind the Citizen's United case...
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:39 AM
Mar 2019

... and why the GOP/right wingers brought it? To hide where their campaign moneys come from.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump inauguration took m...