Fact check: Bill Clinton at the DNC
Source: des moines register/usa today/factcheck.org
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (USA TODAY) Former president Bill Clinton's stem-winding nomination speech was a fact-checker's nightmare: lots of effort required to run down his many statistics and factual claims, producing little for us to write about.
Republicans will find plenty of Clinton's scorching opinions objectionable. But with few exceptions, we found his stats checked out.
Read more: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/usatoday/article/57627036?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CIowa%20Politics%20Insider%7Cs
45 min speech, this is all they could find? If you read the article, at one point, when they were referring to his energy import use dropping stat, they actually used the term 'substantially correct', ....
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)Or do we have to keep squawking "they both do it?"
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Bucky
(54,035 posts)ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Repubs are liars, period.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)malaise
(269,093 posts)mindfulNJ
(2,367 posts)Looks like Bill's speech checks out pretty well!
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)"And plenty of other Clinton statistics checked out as accurate. For example, he said that since 1961, when John F. Kennedy took office, 42 million private-sector jobs had been added while Democrats held the White House, compared with 24 million while Republicans were in office. And that's exactly what Bloomberg News reported in a May 8 story.
He also accused Republicans of blocking 1 million potential new jobs, but that checked out, too:
Clinton: Last year the Republicans blocked the president's job plan, costing the economy more than a million new jobs.
Two independent economists Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics and Joel Prakken of Macroeconomics Advisers had estimated that Obama's proposed American Jobs Act would add more than 1 million jobs. Zandi claimed it would add 1.9 million jobs; Prakken 1.3 million.
Senate Republicans blocked the $447 billion measure, and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell denounced it as "a charade that's meant to give Democrats a political edge" in 2012."
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,015 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,461 posts)For all the visiting Cave dwellers.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)....have been mysteriously quiet this morning...
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)no time to be dicks!
cstanleytech
(26,303 posts)proReality
(1,628 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,521 posts)He also accused Republicans of blocking 1 million potential new jobs, but that checked out, too:
Clinton: Last year the Republicans blocked the president's job plan, costing the economy more than a million new jobs.
Two independent economists Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics and Joel Prakken of Macroeconomics Advisers had estimated that Obama's proposed American Jobs Act would add more than 1 million jobs. Zandi claimed it would add 1.9 million jobs; Prakken 1.3 million. Senate Republicans blocked the $447 billion measure, and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell denounced it as "a charade that's meant to give Democrats a political edge" in 2012.
Will the Republicans try to rebut those facts or just ignore them.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)chloes1
(88 posts)and focus on the "are you better off" taunt. But that, just me.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)BINGO.
This is a meme that needs to spread.
Republican ideas don't work, haven't worked and will not work. That's why they have to lie about them.
Their very core ideas DON'T WORK.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)The Associated Press is apparently trying to be Fair and Balanced with their Fact checking. The highlights:
o Clinton was wrong blaming gridlock on Republicans because Republicans voted against compromises with Obama while Democrats did not like the compromises. Not liking something is apparently the same as voting against it.
o They cited the same healthcare cost thing as the OP article. Which is a fair criticism.
o Clinton was wrong for saying the economy was great during his second term because he did something wrong economically at the end of his term. His mistakes does not mean his successes were not factual, though it is fair to being them up in response. But it is somewhat stretching the point to call this a "fact check".
o Clinton was wrong when he quoted the Romney campaign as saying they were not going to have their campaign dictated by facts because Clinton once lied about a blow job. Clinton tried to keep some minor hanky-panky a secret. Therefore, the Romney campaign is factual. I realize that Liberals and Conservatives think differently, but I can usually figure out their reasoning no matter how flawed it may be. But this one ?
http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-clinton-claims-compromise-stretch-043255807--election.html
oldsarge54
(582 posts)You are an evil man, that is why I approved of you as my first democratic vote. Using facts that check out on Republicans, heads will be exploding in boardrooms all over the nation. Thanks again.