Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,780 posts)
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 06:04 PM Sep 2012

New changes to Keystone XL pipeline said to protect drinking water

Source: Omaha World Herald

By Paul Hammel

LINCOLN — TransCanada Inc. on Wednesday submitted about 20 miles of changes to the proposed Nebraska route for the Keystone XL pipeline.

The changes are designed to address concerns about municipal drinking-water wellfields and sandy, erodible soils.

The new route tinkers slightly with the detour the company outlined for the 36-inch, crude-oil pipeline in April to avoid Nebraska's environmentally fragile Sand Hills, a condition suggested by federal regulators and later agreed to with the Nebraska Legislature last fall.

In the final route, two detours were outlined to avoid municipal wellfields at Clarks, Neb., which is northeast of Grand Island along the Platte River, and Western, Neb., which is west of Beatrice.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20120905/NEWS/709059858/1685#new-changes-to-keystone-xl-pipeline-said-to-protect-drinking-water



Photo: http://www.omaha.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=OW&Date=20120905&Category=NEWS&ArtNo=709059858&Ref=AR&Profile=1685&maxw=598&maxh=400
PAUL HAMMEL/THE WORLD HERALD
Landowners along the new route for the Keystone XL pipeline have said it's even worse than crossing the heart of the Sand Hills. They argued that not only is the land sandy and porous, like the Sand Hills, but subject to devasting erosion that could wash out the pipeline and cause a leak that would spill into the Niobrara River and ultimately, the Missouri.


Map:

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New changes to Keystone XL pipeline said to protect drinking water (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2012 OP
I still say BS sakabatou Sep 2012 #1
So there's a good excuse to give it a green light. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #2
With all due respect we should be debating the real environmental issue here. jimlup Sep 2012 #3

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
3. With all due respect we should be debating the real environmental issue here.
Wed Sep 5, 2012, 10:12 PM
Sep 2012

Sure I'm concerned about the drinking water in Nebraska but the global catastrophe which we appear to be facing takes precedence and can not be ignored. The tar sands must not be converted to atmospheric CO2 that is the real and definite objection to Keystone XL.

The arctic this year is truly scary:

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/09/05/799761/death-spiral-watch-experts-warn-near-ice-free-arctic-in-summer-in-a-decade-volume-trends-continue/

We can all pretend it is about drinking water in Nebraska if that blocks it but it really isn't.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New changes to Keystone X...