Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:14 PM Oct 2018

SCOTUS Lets North Dakota Enforce Full Voter ID Law For Upcoming Midterms

Source: Talking Points Memo



By Tierney Sneed
October 9, 2018 5:38 pm

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed North Dakota to enforce for the midterm elections its full voter ID law, which a federal judge had previously sought to relax in a lawsuit brought by Native Americans in the state.

The law lets voters who don’t have the required ID show certain supplemental documentation with their name and street address. Native Americans in the state had challenged a provision in the law requiring that the address be a residential street address, rather than a PO Box or other kind of address, given that some members of some tribes don’t have residential street addresses.

A federal judge ruled in favor of the challengers and expanded the law’s requirements so documents with non-residential street addresses were acceptable. However, an appeals court blocked that ruling for the 2018 elections, and the Supreme Court on Tuesday decided to leave appeals court order blocking the expansion of the law in place.

The Supreme Court did not give the full breakdown on how the justices voted on the issue, but Justices Elena Kagan and Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly noted their dissent, with Ginsburg writing that the “the risk of disfranchisement is large.”

Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/scotus-lets-north-dakota-enforce-full-voter-id-law-for-upcoming-midterms

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Lets North Dakota Enforce Full Voter ID Law For Upcoming Midterms (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2018 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author rurallib Oct 2018 #1
That's exactly what Mitch meant.. mountain grammy Oct 2018 #4
the 2000 coup by the 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court has allowed Republicans rurallib Oct 2018 #11
Kavanaugh did not participate in the case. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2018 #10
Thank you, I stand corrected rurallib Oct 2018 #13
Did Sotomeyer vote Yes? Without Boof's vote why not a tie? Kept vote Secret! Bullshit we pay them OhNo-Really Oct 2018 #16
It takes 4 Yes votes for SCOTUS to agree to hear a case. Calista241 Oct 2018 #21
ok, but it takes a SCOTUS majority to rule on a case, a tie sends case back to lower court OhNo-Really Oct 2018 #22
That's only after a case is heard and the court releases its opinion. Calista241 Oct 2018 #23
From the article SHRED Oct 2018 #12
Thank you. Apologize for making assumptions and shall delete the offending post rurallib Oct 2018 #14
I wasn't offended SHRED Oct 2018 #17
Native Americans saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #2
Lie. Cheat. Steal. That's the only way Republicans can win an election, and the justices just procon Oct 2018 #3
I am shocked I tell you tymorial Oct 2018 #5
And so it begins..... Kajun Gal Oct 2018 #6
Well here you go bernie or bust voters along with the jill stien voters et al .. you built this Fullduplexxx Oct 2018 #7
Death by a 1000 rulings. NoMoreRepugs Oct 2018 #8
SCOTUS - The Supreme Court branch of the Republican Party dalton99a Oct 2018 #9
FUCK TRUMP. AND ESPECIALLY FUCK ANYONE THAT DIDN'T VOTE ALL DEMOCRATIC IN dbackjon Oct 2018 #15
Ain't we got the best SCOTUS ever? sinkingfeeling Oct 2018 #18
Making it harder for Heidi Heitkamp to be re-elected muriel_volestrangler Oct 2018 #19
"The risk of disenfranchisement" is the GOP goal. Nitram Oct 2018 #20

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

rurallib

(62,427 posts)
11. the 2000 coup by the 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court has allowed Republicans
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:25 PM
Oct 2018

to appoint 4 more much younger Republicans (Kavie, Gorsuch, Alito and Roberts) that will be on the SCOTUS for another 25 years. Had they allowed the count to be completed which Gore would have won there would be at least 2 Dems or at least middle the road instead of Roberts and Alito.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
21. It takes 4 Yes votes for SCOTUS to agree to hear a case.
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 11:45 AM
Oct 2018

The liberal block could have brought this case before the court if they had wanted to.

These vote totals are never announced. Occasionally, one of the Justices will read a statement from the bench on why the court should hear a case, but this is very rarely / almost never done.

OhNo-Really

(3,985 posts)
22. ok, but it takes a SCOTUS majority to rule on a case, a tie sends case back to lower court
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 11:56 AM
Oct 2018

ruling.

Who voted in favor of this case?

Not Ginsberg, not Kagan, crickets from Sotomeyer who, by the way, brough another ND case to the court.

Did she vote to disenfranchise North Dakota voters with no atreet addresses?

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
23. That's only after a case is heard and the court releases its opinion.
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 03:50 PM
Oct 2018

If the Supreme Court declines to take a case, the lower court’s ruling stands.

The Justice’s on the Supreme Court will vote of whether to hear a case or not.

We never learn the vote totals of this process, and as i mentioned, it’s only rarely that a particular Justice will object to the court not taking a case by saying something from the bench.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
12. From the article
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:25 PM
Oct 2018

"Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was confirmed to the Supreme Court this weekend, did not participate in the court’s decision."

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
2. Native Americans
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:20 PM
Oct 2018

feed us and taught us how to survive when we arrived on this continent and this is their reward? We deny them a vote.

Shame on US, I am ashamed.

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. Lie. Cheat. Steal. That's the only way Republicans can win an election, and the justices just
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:20 PM
Oct 2018

approved it.

Fullduplexxx

(7,866 posts)
7. Well here you go bernie or bust voters along with the jill stien voters et al .. you built this
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 06:24 PM
Oct 2018

Did anyone learn anything ....

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
19. Making it harder for Heidi Heitkamp to be re-elected
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 06:26 AM
Oct 2018
The Supreme Court’s order will likely make it harder for Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, considered the most vulnerable Democrat in the Senate, to retain her seat in November. Heitkamp won her seat by less than 3,000 votes in 2012 with strong backing from Native Americans, and she is the only statewide elected Democrat. North Dakota Republicans began changing voting rules to make it harder to cast a ballot months after Heitkamp’s victory six years ago. Republicans have claimed the changes to voter ID requirements are intended to stop voter fraud, even though in-person fraud is exceedingly rare.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/10/supreme-court-makes-it-harder-for-tribal-north-dakotans-to-vote/

Could be the difference in control of the Senate.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SCOTUS Lets North Dakota ...