David Koch breaks from GOP on gay marriage, taxes, defense cuts
Source: Politico
TAMPA, Fla. Billionaire industrialist David Koch, who is helping steer millions of dollars to elect Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans, on Thursday told POLITICO he disagrees with the GOPs stance on gay marriage and believes the U.S. needs to consider raising taxes to balance the budget.
Koch, who is serving as a delegate to the Republican National Convention from New York, spoke to POLITICO after delivering brief remarks at a reception held in his honor him by Americans for Prosperity, the political advocacy group he chairs and has helped fund.
The 1980 vice presidential nominee for the socially liberal but fiscally conservative Libertarian Party, Koch told POLITICO I believe in gay marriage when asked about the GOPs stance on gay rights.
-snip-
Koch said he thinks the U.S. military should withdraw from the Middle East and said the government should consider defense spending cuts, as well as possible tax increases to get its fiscal house in order a stance anathema to many in the Republican Party.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/80483.html
He still thinks that "probably every federal department has to take cuts."
But now that he's said that "its going to require some tax increases" to balance the budget, there will be Republican heads exploding all over.
Starting with Grover Norquist's.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)I also donate to the ACLU (full disclosure).
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)Norquist thinks he's the one who owns the Repukes. Could there be a fight between Grover and the Koch's. ? What the Koch's biggest concern is the EPA. They will not want to have to pay for all that Canadian crude poisoning the Ogallala Aquifer in Nebraska.
Just because the Koch's might go for a slight increase in income taxes on the rich. I'd wager they will fight tooth and nail to stop Obama's 5% increase in capital gains. That is the means by which the rich only pay 15% on average on their income.
Hells Liberal
(88 posts)Seriously, it sounds to me like he's on a public relations push to make himself seem more like he shares some progressive views or to look like he identifies more with the American people.
He's still a scumbag.
safeinOhio
(32,696 posts)Obama's campaign, I might believe it.
oldsarge54
(582 posts)The Original Tea Partys were about taxes and smaller government. Then the social conservatives attempted to hijack the Tea Party and were partically successful. The reflects the long standing unholy marraige between the main Republican Party and the Moral Majority, and decendants.
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)The Chamber is less nuts than the tea people. In the end the Tea people will one day learn, they've been had by the Chamber. The Chamber being the defender of monopoly. When and will the chamber exert their power over their tar baby, the Tea people in order to not push the country over the cliff.
oldsarge54
(582 posts)You do know the biggest opponent to e-verify is the chamber of commerce.
cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)the Chamber will side in with the monopolists.
oldsarge54
(582 posts)Of course not! That has been the Republican ideal since 1870, starting with helping railroads out.
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Most likely on things like gasoline, tobacco and alcohol. That's the same trick Bush I used to cover the cost of cutting taxes on expensive cars, jewelry and boats. Don't be surprised if "some tax increases" also means "middle class paying their fair share". I'd be absolutely dumbfounded if his "some tax increases" included hikes for millionaires or corporations.
magic59
(429 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)or CA when they were having a vote on gay marriage?
He's a liar like the rest of them
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)control freak who is responsible for major pollution and support of a President who tortured and murdered innocent human beings.
alp227
(32,037 posts)My thoughts exactly. His support for these issues doesn't change any of the bad things Koch Industries have done to the world.
AllyCat
(16,194 posts)He's a complete jerk and if we agree on this one little thing, it does not make up for the cruelty he has inflicted on the American people by poisoning our entire political system. May he rot in hell.
cstanleytech
(26,299 posts)BadGimp
(4,015 posts)GEOpix
(65 posts)The republicans have proposed such a draconian agenda to this point that it's hard for the majority of Americans not to be concerned, and turned off. All of a sudden we are seeing an attempt all across the Republican party to put on a human face for the time remaining until the election. If David Koch was the only one, I might give it some credence, but when they all start doing it simultaneously, it's a tactic. My belief is that IT'S A TACTIC!!!
AllyCat
(16,194 posts)so it will all be fine.
The Kochs are slime. I really don't care how they think about gay rights because they do so much harm to all people, including LGBTs.
I am completely opposed to the Republican platform, including gay rights, but just don't give a rat's behind about what this f*ck thinks.
Kingofalldems
(38,461 posts)These people must have some diabolical plans in store.
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)your billions has helped to make the statement, "the damage is done" true. who gives a damn what you're against you repig bastard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DissidentVoice
(813 posts)Grover Norquist is the real power behind the GOP...and has coerced so many of them into his Faustian "bargain."
In the end, I think most of them are going to listen to Norquist because he has them all by the short and curlies.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)That is so obvious.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)If you think about it, it's crazy
DissidentVoice
(813 posts)Correct. It's crazy.
However, Norquist has so many of the Republican elected representatives on his leash, one has to wonder how and why he got them there.
He's a modern-day Rasputin.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)the 1%. http://www.atr.org/ This group is about as nonprofit as Faux News. It's another RW media moneymaking machine.
Go to the ATR website and you'll see it can accept donations as a 501 c-3 non profit org. Also, the ATR "nonprofit affiliates" for various issues are all under the same umbrella---click "contact" for each indiv. "group" and the contact info is the same as ATR's.
IOW, Norquist has no magical power, he GETS his power from the 1% RW that funds his org and his website as a "nonprofit," so any money they make they can plow back into their propaganda machine or donate to the secret Superpacs.
I really hope IRS takes a look at this complete bullshit "nonprofit."
DissidentVoice
(813 posts)I have long wondered how an unelected demagogue like Norquist has come to have such power (if only in shaping opinions) over nearly an entire political party.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Did a child recently come out of the closet?
Seems to have that effect on people... suddenly it is about THEM instead of someone else... so very Republican
MADem
(135,425 posts)Can't take it with ya, Dave...!!!
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)I fucking love it.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)with himself.
aquart
(69,014 posts)85% from all sources after first seven million. Same on inheritance. Make a sacrifice for your country.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)the corporate pigs will say and do anything to they have to.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
rks306
(116 posts)Well, the next thing he will say is that he wants Obama reelected.
Lunabelle
(454 posts)Well, shut my mouth. He just want to pollute our planet without regulations, but on the other shit, he's A-ok? Wow, what a strange mind.
Javaman
(62,531 posts)the mantra of the right wing has always been to raise taxes, but on the middle and lower class, never on the rich.
and far as him now coming out in favor of gay rights, I think that's a balloon he's floating to see how fast his paid politicians jump.
if none bite, he won't say anything and slink back into the control room of his corporate machine to pull more levers and squeeze out more money. He doesn't care. and making the mistake that he suddenly does, would be complete stupidity on our part.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Cannikin
(8,359 posts)n/t
turtlerescue1
(1,013 posts)Thanks highplainsdem.
Up until your post all I had heard was on ThomHartmann today, that Grover and David Koch are not seeing eye-to-eye.
Have wondered with SO many names and egos involved if there wouldn't be some controversies among the repiglicans. Too many cooks. Okay, too many CROOKS, hard to be any honor among that many theives, sheisters and moneylovers.
Still I would trust them as far as I can throw my vehicle.
What I still don't get is the motives of the Catholic church and the Fundies being openly in bed with these folks. Time will tell eh?