Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Aug 15, 2018, 05:24 PM Aug 2018

White House cannot shield information on transgender military ban: judge Jonathan Stempel

Source: Reuters



AUGUST 15, 2018 / 4:35 PM / UPDATED 42 MINUTES AGO

(Reuters) - A federal judge in Baltimore rejected the Trump administration’s request to shield information it employed when deciding to ban transgender people from the U.S. military.

The decision on Tuesday by U.S. Magistrate Judge A. David Copperthite came in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf more than one dozen transgender people serving or who want to serve in the military.

Copperthite declined to decide whether President Donald Trump deserved a protective order for his own communications, pending a ruling on whether to dismiss Trump as a defendant.

Andy Reuss, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, declined to comment.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-transgender/white-house-cannot-shield-information-on-transgender-military-ban-judge-idUSKBN1L0259

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House cannot shield information on transgender military ban: judge Jonathan Stempel (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2018 OP
K&R Solly Mack Aug 2018 #1
Can only imagine what name he has for them. Historic NY Aug 2018 #2
Let's see this info ck4829 Aug 2018 #3
...ACLU lawyer Josh Block said the decision means the administration must set forth its "actual reas riversedge Aug 2018 #4
k for visibility riversedge Aug 2018 #5

riversedge

(70,235 posts)
4. ...ACLU lawyer Josh Block said the decision means the administration must set forth its "actual reas
Thu Aug 16, 2018, 03:37 AM
Aug 2018


....ACLU lawyer Josh Block said the decision means the administration must set forth its “actual reasons” for the ban.

“It is difficult to believe that concerns about fitness and deployability changed so dramatically in such a short time,” Block said in an interview. “It suggests they may have been a pretext for a discriminatory purpose.”

The case is Stone et al v Trump et al, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, No. 17-02459.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House cannot shield...