Manafort trial day 4: Accountant concedes possible wrongdoing, Manafort's double life
Source: Politico
'They never told us about any income deposited in foreign accounts,' Manafort's accountant told jurors.
By JOSH GERSTEIN and DARREN SAMUELSOHN 08/03/2018 12:50 PM EDT Updated 08/03/2018 03:55 PM EDT
An accountant for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort admitted at Manafort's tax- and bank-fraud trial Friday that she filed tax returns she thought contained false information and that she may have committed a crime in doing so.
Accountant Cindy Laporta said she had a sense that what Manafort and aide Rick Gates told her about funds being transferred into their international political consulting business wasn't accurate.
"I prepared the tax returns and communicated with banks based on information that Mr. Gates and Mr. Manafort provided to me that I didn't believe," said Laporta, the first witness at the trial to testify under a grant of immunity.
The admission is the first time a witness has acknowledged knowing involvement in potential wrongdoing during Manafort's trial, where the longtime lobbyist is fighting charges brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. Laporta is one of five people on the Muellers witness list for whom the government requested immunity.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/03/paul-manafort-trial-2018-761300
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/08/03/paul-manafort-trial-day-4-what-to-expect-from-testimony-today/?utm_term=.2aa34792c48b
Cindy Laporta is now testifying that she was involved the falsification of documents to help Paul Manafort obtain loans.
First, she said that although documents from Manaforts bookkeeper showed that a property he owned in Lower Manhattan was being used as a rental in 2015 he made $116,000 in income while also claiming depreciation she told an employee of Citizens Bank it was a second home because Manafort could get a better rate on a long that way.
Next, she testified that the same bank employee, David Fallarino, said Manafort needed more liquidity to qualify for a loan.
The bank wanted to see more money available to pay back the loan, she said.
So, she reached out to Gates, who told her a $1.5 million loan from Peranova Holdings in 2012 had been forgiven in 2015. She told that to Fallarino, who asked for color ie, documentation.
Asked who directed her to say the loan was forgiven, she said Mr. Manafort or Mr. Gates. She relied on their word, she said.
Given her experience with the Telmar loan, prosecutor Uzo Asonye asked, did Laporta believe the loan had really been forgiven in 2015?
Uh no, she replied.
spooky3
(34,458 posts)Even at a loss, he would probably have been ok with regard to cash flow. Of course he still had other legal problems. But it amazes me that he made things much more difficult for himself because he wouldnt let go of the properties.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)Might have been in his name, but Oleg gave so much money, they might have his.
spooky3
(34,458 posts)His daughters name. She apparently paid the down payment. Its still a sellers market there so he could have cleared close to $2 mill, given his daughter back her down payment, and reduced other debts. Likely he had more equity in at least one other property.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)was smart. Not one single one of them. They're just cruel and greedy.
spooky3
(34,458 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 3, 2018, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)
With crimes when he or she is that dumb. But then, maybe hes not getting away with it.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)very soon and pay he will.