Koch Brothers-Linked Group Declares New War on Unions
Source: Bloomberg
The Supreme Court decision to kill agency fees triggers a massive campaign to accelerate the demise of the American labor movement.
By Josh Eidelson
June 27, 2018, 1:51 PM EDT
Following a U.S. Supreme Court decision that millions of public sector workers can stop paying union fees, a group tied to Republican billionaires long opposed to organized labor and its support of the Democratic Party has pledged to build on the landmark ruling to further marginalize employee representation.
The conservative nonprofit Freedom Foundation said that starting Wednesday, it will deploy 80 people to a trio of West Coast union bastions: California, Oregon and its home state of Washington. The canvassers were hired in March and trained this month, according to internal documents reviewed by Bloomberg News. The goal of the multi-pronged campaign is to shrink union ranks in the three states by 127,000 membersand to offer an example for similar efforts targeting unions around the country.
Their employer isnt going to tell them, and the union isnt going to tell them, said the anti-union groups labor policy director, Maxford Nelsen. So it falls to organizations like the Freedom Foundation to take up that mantle and make sure that public employees are informed of their constitutional rights.
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-27/koch-brothers-linked-group-declares-new-war-on-unions
Hey Maxford Nelsen....................your Right to work for less is BS and we will abolish the Taft-Hartley................mark my words
SHRED
(28,136 posts)People posting are clueless what agency fees are.
The stupidity is so fucking depressing.
Fools like sheep to the slaughter.
turbinetree
(24,713 posts)there pensions are going to be under attack, there medicare is going to be under attack, because of what happened today, unions fight to preserve those institutions, so that people when they get older are not eating dig food.................and if they really understood a democracy and the union they would understand, that when you have a majority +1 you have a majority representing you the individual, right now you have two + billionaires that do not like you are me, they want money and they only represent themselves, and those same people whine that its getting worse, no shit Sherlock, when all they have do is look at who is on the bench and those that got them on the bench, some of these justices have gone to Palm Springs and Aspen to be seen with these two assholes the Koch's....................amazing
Jane Mayer's book Dark Money nailed what these and others are all about, and Ian Millhiser nailed it his book Injustices..........
I just came back from the landfill and I spoke with the lady letting me in, and I asked her did you hear that the Supreme court is going after public employees, and I asked her if they were Union, she said nope, but her husband works in the state police.............she then said we can save thirty dollars, we do not have to pay..................I looked at her and said, really your social safety programs are for sell at thirty dollars even if you are not in a union you don't have majority+1 ....................it's based on your merit.................
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,033 posts)Is that why it has been deemed a National Security Threat?
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-kuttner-canada-trade_us_5b2fe8d7e4b0040e27443961
Canada also recovered more quickly from the global financial collapse of 2008 because the Canadians insisted on a wellregulated banking system while the other G-7 nations were going on a deregulation binge. And Canada of course has a universal health insurance system, as well as a lot more, well-run affordable social housing.
Canada has its problems, to be sure, but one of them is not U.S.-style inequality. A classic book on the subject, Dan Zuberis Differences That Matter (2006), compared the working poor in service-sector jobs in Vancouver and Seattle. These are two very similar cities, but for the fact that one is in the U.S. and the other is in Canada.
Zuberi found that in such occupations as hotel and motel work, Canadians lived far more decently. With unions, their earnings were higher. Their pensions were better, housing more affordable, health coverage taken for granted.
bucolic_frolic
(43,258 posts)You know, with side benefits of paying union membership - great deals with banks or credit unions, low-interest auto loans, consumer financial counseling, memberships for a variety of family-centered services. In other words, put more value in the union membership so workers will gladly pay to join and maintain their membership. Or I'm guessing this is just about the politics of it. Once you add the politics it's a free speech issue. So have a check off box, like a tax return. Do you want $3 a month to go to support union leadership's political efforts?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,404 posts)there are side benefits.
unionplus.org
MarcA
(2,195 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,258 posts)without union membership and political activity?
Seems to me this in the long run could undermine the case against unions in a big way
mountain grammy
(26,644 posts)My husband and I both belonged to unions, as do both my sons. Anti union propaganda is strong, but too many people are just willfully ignorant.
Initech
(100,100 posts)geretogo
(1,281 posts)by two self appointed Kings , King Charles and King David Koch . Isn't this why we had a revolution
in 1776 so we could have self government and not be ruled by a King or Oligarch Kings . Unless we all
take to the streets by the many millions now I think democratic government will be only a memory .
NEOBuckeye
(2,781 posts)There's a very warm place waiting for that man when his time finally comes.