Trump ally apologises for 'cotton-picking' comment about black strategist
Source: Guardian
Citizens United president David Bossie posts public apology for using racially charged term on Fox & Friends
Edward Helmore
Sun 24 Jun 2018 16.53 EDT
David Bossie, a close ally and supporter of Donald Trump, apologised on Sunday for using a racially charged term when he said a black Democratic strategist was “out of his cotton-picking mind”.
Now president of the conservative advocacy group Citizens United, Bossie was a deputy campaign manager for Trump in the 2016 election. He is co-author with former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski of a book about the campaign, Let Trump Be Trump.
Lewandowski attracted controversy this week in his own appearance on Fox, when he appeared to mock the plight of a girl with Down’s syndrome who was said to have been caught up in the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy. On Saturday the two men accompanied Trump on a trip to Nevada.
On Sunday, Bossie appeared Fox & Friends – the president’s favoured show – for a discussion about liberal reactions to Trump’s immigration policy.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jun/24/trump-ally-apologises-for-cotton-picking-comment-about-black-strategist
= new reply since forum marked as read
'Ya'll jist wait a gol-dawn-cottin-pickin-minit'-- that's so funny the way you wrote it (spoke)! 
Growing up I never heard that expression except maybe in some old movies by actors like Walter Brennan or something.
As a boy Johnny Cash and his family picked and bagged cotton in Arkansas.
My MIL and husband picked it in southern Va. in the 1950s.
Why Was Cotton ‘King’?
by Henry Louis Gates, Jr. | Originally posted on The Root
Its beautiful bolls,
And bales of rich value, the Master controls.
Of “mud-stills” he prates, and would haughtily bring
The world to acknowledge that “Cotton is King.”
–The Gospel of Slavery, by “Iron Gray,” [Abel C. Thomas] 1864.
The most commonly used phrase describing the growth of the American economy in the 1830s and 1840s was “Cotton Is King.” We think of this slogan today as describing the plantation economy of the slavery states in the Deep South, which led to the creation of “the second Middle Passage.” But it is important to understand that this was not simply a Southern phenomenon. Cotton was one of the world’s first luxury commodities, after sugar and tobacco, and was also the commodity whose production most dramatically turned millions of black human beings in the United States themselves into commodities. Cotton became the first mass consumer commodity.
Understanding both how extraordinarily profitable cotton was and how interconnected and overlapping were the economies of the cotton plantation, the Northern banking industry, New England textile factories and a huge proportion of the economy of Great Britain helps us to understand why it was something of a miracle that slavery was finally abolished in this country at all.
Let me try to break this down quickly, since it is so fascinating:
Let’s start with the value of the slave population. Steven Deyle shows that in 1860, the value of the slaves was “roughly three times greater than the total amount invested in banks,” and it was “equal to about seven times the total value of all currency in circulation in the country, three times the value of the entire livestock population, twelve times the value of the entire U.S. cotton crop and forty-eight times the total expenditure of the federal government that year.” As mentioned here in a previous column, the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the productivity of cotton harvesting by slaves. This resulted in dramatically higher profits for planters, which in turn led to a seemingly insatiable increase in the demand for more slaves, in a savage, brutal and vicious cycle.
Now, the value of cotton: Slave-produced cotton “brought commercial ascendancy to New York City, was the driving force for territorial expansion in the Old Southwest and fostered trade between Europe and the United States,” according to Gene Dattel. In fact, cotton productivity, no doubt due to the sharecropping system that replaced slavery, remained central to the American economy for a very long time: “Cotton was the leading American export from 1803 to 1937.”
More:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/why-was-cotton-king/
Slaves toiling over the white owners' cotton was even memorialized on the confederate money:
/800/0
They even loved to take photographs of "their" slaves picking cotton in the fields for every day of their lives after being enslaved:
As you can see they forced children to pick "their" cotton, too. Was it a "rite of passage" when a child got so tall,
he or she was given his or her own shoulder bag, so he/she could join the parents in the field, picking cotton? Jesus.
This is NOTHING I would want to celebrate, don't know about you.....
I hope the slavers will NEVER be forgiven, using the lives of human beings to support themselves in a lavish life-style,
wearing the clothes their prisoners made possible by struggling, suffering their entire lives for NOTHING, living in fear
the "owners" might get angry at them if they made a mistake, and lash them with whips, or worse, then even kill them,
after sending out the militia to capture them, if they dared to try to escape, to make an example of them to the others.
