Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 02:14 PM Jun 2018

Supreme Court sides with Florida man in free speech case

Source: AP



.
A man who has been an outspoken critic of the south Florida city where he lives is now 2-0 in disputes with the city before the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with Fane Lozman in a lawsuit that began with his 2006 arrest at a City of Riviera Beach city council meeting. Lozman, who also won a case against the city at the Supreme Court in 2013, was arrested while talking about corruption in the county during a public comment portion of the meeting.
.
.
Lozman, 56, argued he was arrested in retaliation for being a critic of the city and sued. But a lower court said Lozman was barred from bringing a lawsuit for retaliation because a jury found a police officer had probable cause to arrest him for disturbing a lawful assembly. The Supreme Court disagreed, with Justice Anthony Kennedy writing in an 8-1 decision that Lozman's lawsuit isn't barred. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented.
.
.
Lozman's win Monday comes five years after his last victory at the court. In 2013, the justices with Lozman in ruling that a floating home that he had docked at a city-owned marina was a house, not a boat subject to easier government seizure under laws that govern ships and boats.

Read more: https://www.apnews.com/amp/c18c9b7fe3774ffa83fd6c24561d66f3?__twitter_impression=true
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court sides with Florida man in free speech case (Original Post) laserhaas Jun 2018 OP
Of course Thomas dissented. I'm surprised Gorsuch wasn't with him. bitterross Jun 2018 #1
"I thought to myself: Scalia would be against it." sandensea Jun 2018 #2
They love any action against individuals. bitterross Jun 2018 #4
+1 sandensea Jun 2018 #5
How many average citizens get not just one, but two cases seen by the Supreme Court? OnlinePoker Jun 2018 #3
If I were the city, and he sued me a third time, I'd just give it up and settle. N/T Jedi Guy Jun 2018 #6
Gotta hand it to Clarence Thomas. NOMOGOP Jun 2018 #7
 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
1. Of course Thomas dissented. I'm surprised Gorsuch wasn't with him.
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 02:20 PM
Jun 2018

I can't wait to read why Thomas decided against.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
4. They love any action against individuals.
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 02:37 PM
Jun 2018

I will have to make a real search when I have time. But I'm betting I will be hard-pressed to find them in favor of individuals in just about anything. Thomas and Scalia seemed to love any action by the state against an individual but not the corporate "people." Real humans can suck it but corporations and government entities are just grand.

sandensea

(21,665 posts)
5. +1
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 02:41 PM
Jun 2018

You pretty much described the GOPee credo since Reagan.

And the best part is, they got millions of moderate-income Archie Bunkers to parrot it!

OnlinePoker

(5,725 posts)
3. How many average citizens get not just one, but two cases seen by the Supreme Court?
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 02:30 PM
Jun 2018

It must be very rare.

 

NOMOGOP

(87 posts)
7. Gotta hand it to Clarence Thomas.
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 03:40 PM
Jun 2018

He really has been a thorn in the side of justice for his entire term w/only one exception that I can think of and that was NC racial gerrymandering case. McConnell taking Obama SCOTUS is REALLY hurting now.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court sides with ...