Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,064 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 09:41 PM Aug 2012

Audit: FAA ineffective in program to keep animals from hitting planes

Source: CNN

The FAA has not effectively implemented a program designed to keep birds and other animals from causing damage to airplanes, according to an audit from the Department of Transportation.

The agency did not have robust inspection practices, inspectors did not have expertise in wildlife hazards, and they failed to keep adequate records of inspections, Jeffrey Guzzetti, the assistant inspector general for aviation and special program audits, wrote.

Aircraft strike thousands of animals each year. In 2011, there were 9,840 strikes -- nearly 27 a day -- recorded by the FAA, according to the report. The number is five times the number of strikes that were reported in 1990, due in part to increasing bird populations.

The results of a collision with wildlife often are minor but they can cause serious problems, including engine failures like those that forced US Airways Flight 1549, the so-called "Miracle on the Hudson," to crash land in the river.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/23/travel/faa-wildlife-hazards/index.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Audit: FAA ineffective in program to keep animals from hitting planes (Original Post) alp227 Aug 2012 OP
well really the idea is to keep planes from hitting animals. unblock Aug 2012 #1
This story reminds me of this video of a 757 engine ingesting a large bird... mike dub Aug 2012 #2
Thanks for the video... Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Aug 2012 #3
Besides birds, what are these other animals planes are hitting? pnwmom Aug 2012 #4
97% are birds OnlinePoker Aug 2012 #5
Ineffective? oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #6
so bird population has gone up even though we fly more and more--- snooper2 Aug 2012 #7

mike dub

(541 posts)
2. This story reminds me of this video of a 757 engine ingesting a large bird...
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 10:09 PM
Aug 2012

...just as the plane leaves the runway during takeoff.

A lil O/T, as this happened in the UK, and wasn't a *dual engine failure as-in Sully's Miracle on the Hudson... but nice example of flight crew handling single engine failure with aplumb.


OnlinePoker

(5,727 posts)
5. 97% are birds
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 03:01 AM
Aug 2012

From a Christian Science Monitor article from 2009:

...Rabbits, dogs, muskrats, moose (!!!), skunks and white tailed deer – any animal is fair game (pardon the pun). You might feel most sorry for the turtle. When that plane gets moving, he's not going anywhere – ask the Slowskys.

The New York Times calculated that 97 percent of the reports involved birds. But get this: the victims also include alligators.

At least 14 alligators were struck by airplanes between 1994 and 2005. No word how the reptiles fared in those contests.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2009/0424/faa-database-shows-its-not-just-birds-14-alligators-hit-by-airplanes-too

oldsarge54

(582 posts)
6. Ineffective?
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 06:47 AM
Aug 2012

In what sense ineffective? Didn't come up with a working plan? Didn't implement a plan made? Two of the fatal aircraft crashes I've responded to were due to bird strikes, an F-111 and a T-33. It is really a problem that does kill people. In Europe, we kept falconers on base. BTW, rabbits and hares can cause problems too, part of that non-bird 3%.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Audit: FAA ineffective in...