Gillibrand: If Trump wants due process, we'll have hearings on allegations against him
Source: The Hill
BY JACQUELINE THOMSEN - 02/10/18 04:50 PM EST
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) went after President Trump on Saturday for his tweet apparently questioning a lack of "due process" in abuse claims, saying that Congress could hold hearings about sexual misconduct allegations against him if he wanted due process.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Trump had raised concerns about due process in a tweet earlier Saturday, which came in the wake of two White House aides resigning amid allegations of past domestic abuse.
White House staff secretary Rob Porter and speechwriter David Sorensen both resigned this week over the newly revealed allegations, claims that they have denied.
Link to tweet
Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than a dozen women. Female Democratic lawmakers called for Congress to investigate the claims against Trump last year, as did several of his accusers.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/373290-gillibrand-if-trump-wants-due-process-well-have-hearings-on-the-allegations
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)what happens to their non disclosure agreements? Can they testify about how much they were paid and not testify about the abuse?
enough
(13,262 posts)to the obvious next taunt on that issue. I'm surprised she's that tone-deaf.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
..choice of words for her.
So miss you know who.
dicksmc3
(262 posts)She's willing to give Trumpie hearings about his allegations but, when ot came to Senator Al Franken --- NO HEARINGS even after Al agreed to have the Ethics Committee investigate. How does she sleep at night??
TranssexualKaren
(364 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 10, 2018, 08:01 PM - Edit history (1)
#NeverGillibrand
Note: First 10 replies in agreement gets a heart. All hearts are out.
Franken was the one who called for his own self to be investigated.
🤦🏽?♀️
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,077 posts)... tell that to Al.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)Trump can use it to attack her, and all Dems by osmosis.
dchill
(38,556 posts)? Crickets...
suegeo
(2,573 posts)My vote was stolen, as was my voice.
Boo hiss to the Jr. Senator from New York.
Al is innocent.
And somehow, the decent Al is out, Trump the pig is still there and there's Russians to deal with in the special election for Al's seat.
keithbvadu2
(36,949 posts)Gillibrand is a power hungry person (see, no sexism) who railroaded Franken.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)She's a fine one to talk about due process, after she railroaded Franken. I will never forget or forgive.
I want my Senator back.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)I will never get over being pissed about him not getting his due process. She really has a lot of nerve.
sprinkleeninow
(20,267 posts)PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)and that still pisses me off!
onecent
(6,096 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,215 posts)meadowlander
(4,406 posts)Because instead of taking an opportunity to attack Trump, who left himself wide open, we attack the Democrat attacking Trump instead.
JI7
(89,276 posts)KPN
(15,662 posts)WTF? Hearings/due process are suddenly worthwhile? Headline grabbing again. She's totally lost my trust.
mn9driver
(4,428 posts)TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)I'm SO over Sen Gillibrand... I hope she NEVER decides to run for the Dem nomination for President!
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)ananda
(28,879 posts)Did he get due process ???
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)LakeArenal
(28,855 posts)Shes a bigger fool than I thought.
For all you who think its misogyny, tell her to keep her hypocritical mouth shut.
Then she wont be in the line of fire. If Chuck Schumer said the same, hed get roasted too.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Kinda sad.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)CrispyQ
(36,533 posts)It will depress my enthusiasm bigly.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)She's pissed off too many of her fellow Dems by her targetting Franken...and I don't think Dems want to refight the whole thing over again.