Proposed Kentucky Law: Abstinence Is the Expected Standard in Sex Ed
Source: motherjones
Southern legislators mull over how to teach kids about the birds and the bees.
Becca Andrews Jan. 16, 2018 6:00 AM
...................................
Kentucky currently has no law dictating how sex education should be taught, although the states Department of Education is working on guidelines for health classes in public schools, which generally include some form of sex ed. State Democrats recently introduced House Bill 80 that would require age appropriate sex ed to begin in the fourth grade and continue through 12th grade.
Republican state Sen. Stephen Meredith, on the other hand, wants every grade to learn the same thing: He introduced a Senate bill to require sex ed classes to teach that abstinence from sexual activity outside of marriage is the expected standard for school-age children.
In a Senate committee hearing on Thursday to discuss Merediths bill, state Sen. Danny Carroll, a Republican who voted in favor of SB 71, explained his rationale for requiring abstinence and monogamy as the standard in sex ed classes: As a society, if we dont set some baselines for our children, there are going to be no limits, he said, according to the Louisville Courier-Journal.
The bill was criticized for its narrow ideology by comprehensive sex education advocates and community faith leaders, the Courier-Journal reports. Rev. Lauren Jones Mayfield, a pastor at Highland Baptist Church in Louisville, said the bill assumes sex is between a married man and woman in a Christian home, and criticized abstinence education for placing responsibility on women to be gatekeepers and creating a culture of shame around sex.........................................
Read more: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/01/proposed-kentucky-law-abstinence-is-the-expected-standard-in-sex-ed/
This makes me so so so ANGRY!
Link to tweet
Longs Peak 14,259'
? @LongsPeak14259
24m24 minutes ago
Replying to @MotherJones
Fine, teach abstinence, but you should also be teaching how babies are made, so they have some clue.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Toni Blake
? @ToniBlake15
31m31 minutes ago
Replying to @MotherJones
That is Catholic law, not constitutional law.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Heather McAllister
? @HeatherMcAlli12
47m47 minutes ago
Replying to @MotherJones
What could possibly go wrong??
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Lynne Aldridge
? @littleblueshed
55m55 minutes ago
Replying to @MotherJones
If it were "Gun Ed", fair enough. But this is the 21st century - do they realise that?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
genxlib
(5,528 posts)Everyone knows that teenagers do exactly what adults want them to do.
This pisses me off.
I am a big believer in comprehensive and accurate sex-ed. My daughter took hers and I was so impressed with the results that I signed on to teach the next generation.
I am not a natural fit for teaching sex education but I refuse to sit by while kids don't get the info they need. Having taught it, I became an even bigger proponent.
jimmil
(629 posts)Dictating how it should work now isn't going to work.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)But you be damn sure to make me LOTS of grandchildren!
Of course those two things are unrelated!
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Thats how them Kentuckians like their republican girlies!
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Old Crank
(3,589 posts)Then it is time to demand that ALL fertile males wear chastity belts. All teh time until married and then when they leave their houses.
Kristofer Bry
(175 posts)After all, such policies have worked so fucking magnificently in other states!
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)eissa
(4,238 posts)Oh wait....
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)A joke of a career but a career nonetheless.
metalbot
(1,058 posts)That just reads strangely in the context of:
"abstinence from sexual activity outside of marriage is the expected standard for school-age children."
I mean, once you describe someone as a "school-age child", I feel like marriage shouldn't really be on the table.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Them girls are right for marrin by 9th grade!
And before alerting! It is true. They can marry under the correct scenario
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Dr_Pretorius
(71 posts)Already proven not to work.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Instead of teaching sex education, let's just teach our teenage girls how to care for a baby and our teenage boys how to look for a damn job so they can pay their child support.
Either that, or we could get kids' parents to visit the classroom telling the young'uns how great sex is, how they just LOVE to have sex, all that jive...since no kid ever wants to do what his parents like, this will work just about as well as abstinence-only sex ed.