Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:36 AM Dec 2017

Hastings says never told of $220K settlement for sex harassment claims against him

Source: Politico



By ALEXANDRA GLORIOSO 12/08/2017 08:53 PM EST

The U.S. Treasury Department settled a $220,000 sexual-harassment lawsuit on behalf of Congressman Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) in 2014, according to Roll Call. But the South Florida lawmaker said he was never informed of any settlement.

“This matter was handled solely by the Senate Chief Counsel for Employment. At no time was I consulted, nor did I know until after the fact that such a settlement was made," said Hastings in a written statement to POLITICO Florida.

"I am outraged that any taxpayer dollars were needlessly paid to Ms. [Winsome] Packer," he said. Hastings said the original lawsuit was dismissed in 2012 and that he was cleared in 2014 by the House Committee on Ethics.

The lawsuit was filed in 2011 by Judicial Watch, a public interest group. In the lawsuit, a former staffer on the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Packer, alleges she was the victim of “unwelcome sexual advances” and “unwelcome touching” by then-chairman Hastings.



Read more: https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2017/12/08/treasury-department-settled-220-000-sexual-harassment-case-for-congressman-alcee-hastings-in-2014-8634339

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hastings says never told of $220K settlement for sex harassment claims against him (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2017 OP
Judicial watch...nuff said. Cattledog Dec 2017 #1
Oh, so it didn't happen because JD is involved? 7962 Dec 2017 #8
Makes perfect sense. Not. BootinUp Dec 2017 #2
Uh, yeah, I'm sure it went down just like that . . . MousePlayingDaffodil Dec 2017 #3
How does a $220,000 settlement make for a "cleared" candidate, $22,000 is a nuisance .... marble falls Dec 2017 #4
+1 2naSalit Dec 2017 #6
I agree totally. This shit has gotten ridiculous. Slush fund is EXACTLY what it is. 7962 Dec 2017 #9
"Winsome Packer" Achilleaze Dec 2017 #5
IKR? What was that other guys name caught with the 17 yr old? "Rupert Ditsworth". nt 7962 Dec 2017 #10
Bye bye Hastings kimbutgar Dec 2017 #7
Resign now. tazkcmo Dec 2017 #11
 

7962

(11,841 posts)
8. Oh, so it didn't happen because JD is involved?
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:26 PM
Dec 2017

But it DID happen. Shit like this NEEDS to be exposed

3. Uh, yeah, I'm sure it went down just like that . . .
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:45 AM
Dec 2017

It's not clear to me that, consistent with legal ethics, the Treasury Department could, much less would, settle a lawsuit without even informing the defendant. And Hastings' reputation for veracity isn't all that it could be, let's just say.

marble falls

(57,145 posts)
4. How does a $220,000 settlement make for a "cleared" candidate, $22,000 is a nuisance ....
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:12 AM
Dec 2017

settlement, $220,000 is smoke from a fire.

I want a list of these settlements made in my name and with my taxes. Its beginning to look like a slush fund of hush money. Let the chips fall where they may with no "nondisclosure"

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
9. I agree totally. This shit has gotten ridiculous. Slush fund is EXACTLY what it is.
Sat Dec 9, 2017, 12:29 PM
Dec 2017

they feel no need to worry about it since its been kept secret and they don't lose THEIR money. D & R alike. Keep shining the light!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hastings says never told ...