McConnell: 'Impossible' to promise every member of middle class gets a tax cut
Source: The Hill
BY MALLORY SHELBOURNE - 12/03/17 10:49 AM EST
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Sunday that its impossible to promise that the GOP's tax overhaul will lower the taxes of every person in the middle class.
Well, its impossible to do that, McConnell told ABCs This Week."
You cant craft any bill that would guarantee no one was in a special category that might get a tax increase, the majority leader added. McConnells interview comes after the Senate early Saturday passed its tax overhaul bill, which includes the repeal of ObamaCares individual mandate.
Every segment of tax payers, every category of tax payers, on average, gets significant relief, McConnell said of the bill on Sunday.
###
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/362991-mcconnell-impossible-to-promise-every-member-of-middle-class-gets-a-tax-cut
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)underpants
(182,839 posts)Well at least 97% of Americans did.
unblock
(52,261 posts)if the main focus is just cutting rates across the board, everyone gets a cut, even if the cuts are heavily tilted in favor of the rich.
(i don't remember all the details of shrub's cut, i'm sure there were a few smaller changes that made some people pay more, but it wasn't anything close to the scale of people who will pay more under this latest republican tax scam.)
it's when you start jumbling things around that you create winners and losers, and that's exactly the point -- republicans were so eager to make big winners out of the rich that they had to create losers out of many of the rest of us.
the reason they're going after the state and local income tax deduction is that this mostly affects people in blue states that they're losing anyway, so they won't pay much of a political price for this (though it might affect donations from affected republicans in those states)
yurbud
(39,405 posts)unblock
(52,261 posts)Im sure punishing people in blue states was a big selling point.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)the longer it will take for us to claw it back and maybe the bigger chunk they end up getting to keep.
At least that's what they hope.
Marthe48
(16,975 posts)no text
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Got it.
Nitram
(22,822 posts)might toss you a bone if there's any left over after the ruling class eat their fill.
lastlib
(23,251 posts)So now, --VOILA!-- every "middle class" American gets a tax cut! Simple!
We have GOT to throw these FUCKERS OUT!!
Doreen
(11,686 posts)theaocp
(4,241 posts)Do I need to link to the Huckleberry take on that? McConnell can't expire soon enough. He's using my oxygen.
red dog 1
(27,820 posts)...The Democrats were there...Days of hearings...Days of amendments...The Democrats offered amendments in committee ad nauseam......The process on the floor, the reconciliation process, is regular order...That's how they passed Obamacare......It's - it's - we didn't do anything that you could call a foul on process."
JOHN DICKERSON:
"well, they - "
McCONNELL:
"Well, they didn't -- didn't -- well, let me just say they didn't -- they didn't like the fact that we repealed the unpopular individual mandate from Obamacare, but yet they didn't offer a single amendment to take it out, and they had the opportunity to do it."
DICKERSON:
"Well, they had twenty-five days of debate on Obamacare...And you said the process at the time was arrogant and that they were pushing an unpopular bill through...This bill is unpopular.
Why isn't it the same thing?"
McCONNELL:
"Well, we'll see how unpopular it is when people start noticing they're paying less in taxes, the economy's growing, there are more jobs and opportunity..."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nation-december-3-2017-transcript/
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)The Mandate?
This is the first I've heard this claim.
If so, that's a pretty damn egregious failure on the part of Democrats, to not even TRY ... even though it'd have almost surely have been naught but symbolic. I find it a little bit hard to believe ... esp. coming from McTurtle, but ... well in the end, not much surprises me these days.
Let's just say that'd be disappointing if true ... because everyone w/one half a brain knows that w/o the mandate, the whole scheme falls apart, numbers-wise.
Basically it'd mean everyone would just wait til they're very sick/need surgery/cancer treatment/etc ... THEN enroll because they cannot be turned down to the pre-existing condition rules ... this mandate exists at the behest of the insurers to a large degree, it was pretty much the 'grand bargain'.
Without that, they will have 'cause' to argue that things must go back to how they were ... which, of course, is 'the point' I suppose.
The rich live, the poor die. As it was 'meant to be' ...