Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,649 posts)
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 04:33 PM Dec 2017

Hospital panic over unconscious man's 'do not resuscitate' tattoo

Source: NZ Herald


2 Dec, 2017 8:32am

A man's 'do not resuscitate' tattoo forced Miami emergency doctors to confront the ethical conflict between a patient's wishes and a doctor's duty.

The 70-year-old man was unconscious and presumably drunk, given his elevated blood-alcohol level, when paramedics brought him to the emergency room, the Daily Mail reports.

His pulse slowed to a worrying rate, and the doctors decided to try to save him any way, but were getting no responses, according to a case study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

After consulting with ethicists, the doctors decided to respect the man's tattoo, but the quandary made them aware of the need for an updated system of tracking patients' end of life wishes.

Read more: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11951788

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hospital panic over unconscious man's 'do not resuscitate' tattoo (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2017 OP
I would hate to be in that predicament. Is this tattoo sarcastic or is it an order? Corvo Bianco Dec 2017 #1
When the decision cannot be reversed MosheFeingold Dec 2017 #7
Very wise. paleotn Dec 2017 #19
Coincidentally he had that one put over an earlier removed "Born to be Wild" tattoo. marble falls Dec 2017 #2
"Born to be Wild" tattoo left-of-center2012 Dec 2017 #10
I certainly hope she had some fine memories to contemplate! marble falls Dec 2017 #11
Yikes! Iggo Dec 2017 #3
10 out of 10 for attention to detail, dude. Aristus Dec 2017 #4
Well, in this case, he had documentation, but it took 2 hours to locate it. sl8 Dec 2017 #13
Bracelet or card..... possibly paleotn Dec 2017 #20
Interesting story, thanks for posting n/t hibbing Dec 2017 #5
Tattoos are NOT legally binding Liberalagogo Dec 2017 #6
The problem is, if you don't have the document with you The_jackalope Dec 2017 #8
Thanks for your post. n/t sl8 Dec 2017 #14
Yes thank you dembotoz Dec 2017 #17
So should I get a tattoo that says DBoon Dec 2017 #9
Fellow EMT had one flotsam Dec 2017 #12
Nor can I. Especially if it's in medicalese like "No Code". nt The_jackalope Dec 2017 #15
My wife and I won't die in a hospital. Cold War Spook Dec 2017 #16
You plan on stealing from the rest of us, pintobean Dec 2017 #21
We put chips in dogs and cats... Sancho Dec 2017 #18
I know someone that has that tattooed on their chest tenderfoot Dec 2017 #22

Corvo Bianco

(1,148 posts)
1. I would hate to be in that predicament. Is this tattoo sarcastic or is it an order?
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 04:35 PM
Dec 2017

Meanwhile the guy is dying

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
7. When the decision cannot be reversed
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:34 PM
Dec 2017

If made one way. And the course uncertain.

Then chose the other way.

This is Judaism 101.

Aristus

(66,478 posts)
4. 10 out of 10 for attention to detail, dude.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:03 PM
Dec 2017

But next time, put it in a legal document, not a tattoo...

sl8

(13,949 posts)
13. Well, in this case, he had documentation, but it took 2 hours to locate it.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 09:11 PM
Dec 2017

Last edited Fri Dec 1, 2017, 11:57 PM - Edit history (1)

But that brings up a good question - what does the provider do if they don't have immediate access to the patients medical record or other documentation? Would they abide by a patient's bracelet or wallet card?

paleotn

(17,989 posts)
20. Bracelet or card..... possibly
Sat Dec 2, 2017, 09:40 AM
Dec 2017

Tattoo? Under no circumstances. After all, the verdict for letting someone die in error is far worse than keeping someone alive in error.

The_jackalope

(1,660 posts)
8. The problem is, if you don't have the document with you
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:50 PM
Dec 2017

or the docs don't find it, they are not bound by it. I've heard of doctors wearing "NO CODE" medallions, and also of tattoos like this one. IMO they should always be respected. The ethicists are right, but the law says otherwise.

I'm speaking as a man whose wife signed a DNR in the months before she was granted a medically assisted death in September. We had the legal niceties of a DNR explained to us very carefully. We were advised to pin it to the wall beside the door so I could grab it if she was ever taken to the hospital. We were also advised to put a big bold sign above it, saying "Do Not Resucitate" with an arrow pointing to the document itself - in case EMTs arrived and I wasn't there.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
16. My wife and I won't die in a hospital.
Fri Dec 1, 2017, 09:54 PM
Dec 2017

When the first one dies, there will be a very quiet ceremony in the back yard. Keep those social security checks coming. No joke.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hospital panic over uncon...