Tillerson is firing senior diplomats in droves or forcing them to resign by making them work along
Source: Raw Story
Noor Al-Sibai NOOR AL-SIBAI
24 NOV 2017 AT 22:20 ET
As Secretary of State Rex Tillerson fires and forces the resignations of dozens of State Department staff, including senior diplomats and other high-ranking officials, many are speaking out amid their departures.
According to a Friday night report in the The New York Times, Tillerson has not only frozen hiring and failed to nominate people to the majority of the departments politically-appointed positions hes also engaged in what appears to be an intentional campaign to push out as many career diplomats as possible.
[Tillersons] small cadre of aides have fired some diplomats and gotten others to resign by refusing them the assignments they wanted or taking away their duties altogether, the Times report states. Among those fired or sidelined were most of the top African-American and Latino diplomats, as well as many women, difficult losses in a department that has long struggled with diversity.
Among the methods used to push out senior diplomats is by forcing them to undertake menial tasks under Tillersons presidentially-directed order to accelerate Freedom of Information Act requests (which are currently backlogged). The task has required every department in the bureau to contribute. As a result, midlevel employees and diplomats including some just returning from high-level or difficult overseas assignments to spend months performing mind-numbing clerical functions beside unpaid interns.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/tillerson-is-firing-senior-diplomats-in-droves-or-forcing-them-to-resign-by-making-them-work-alongside-interns-report/
msongs
(67,453 posts)pnwmom
(108,997 posts)more people will be able to read it.
And people with subscriptions to the NYTimes can click through.
Also, all MSM also report on each other's stories, with proper credit. If the WA Post or Reuters had reported on the NYTimes story, would you have said they weren't the source, either?
csziggy
(34,138 posts)Here is the direct link to the original story:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/us/politics/state-department-tillerson.html
I wonder if others can get to the article from that link?
pnwmom
(108,997 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)go (go figure), but if it works there I'm going to be smothering you with cyber kisses for the info. Just a warning. If you don't fight them off I'll assume you're not feeling harassed.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Yes, I've done it. For both NYT and WaPo. It worked for me. (When you think about it, it should work. The only way their site knows you've read 10 articles is because it put a cookie in your pc telling it that. Unless you created an account & you sign in, I guess.)
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Thanks again.
Judi Lynn
(160,631 posts)After you reach it, you are informed you will need a subscription to read the article.
Thanks for your kind help.
csziggy
(34,138 posts)And I read a lot of articles from both WaPo and NYT from links here - often through RawStory articles since I prefer reading the originals.
Maybe I just have managed to hit the lucky spot, though, and never got over their limits.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,095 posts)If there's a gray "open book" symbol next to the URL, click on it, and chances are you can get the text-only version.
Or, try clearing any cookies related to the site. Often, that will re-set your limit.
These don't always work, but they're worth the try.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)They were both well-liked and well-respected.
In any event, Rex Tillerson is the worst Secretary of State we have ever had.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)by THE WORST president this country has ever had.
Trump wants to destroy the State Department because Hillary was Secretary of State in the Obama administration. Just as Trump is trying to destroy everything President Obama did during his two terms, he's also trying to destroy the Department Clinton headed during the Obama Administration. It's his ego running amok again. The Moron in Chief thinks by destroying their legacies, he's obliterating their contributions to U.S. history. All he's succeeding in doing is damaging our country to a point where we may never have the resources and alliances we once enjoyed with countries around the world. Trump thinks he can replace the entire State Department with his 'tweeting'. That's how mentally deranged this asshole is.
delisen
(6,044 posts)and the choice of Big Oil and American investors in Russia--who want sanctions lifted on this new frontier.
I agree that Trump is petty vindictive- but he is a puppet.
Trump gets to have his emotional needs met-but the geopolitical strategy is coming from Russia and the corporations that want to do business in Russia and are opposed to Human Rights policies of our country standing in their way.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)understudy at the KGB to handle all security for American embassies and consulates throughout Russia. Why? and why is no news organization asking why?
karynnj
(59,504 posts)It is true that neither allowed the State Department to control them. Kerry greatly expanded State Department efforts on the environment including creating what is now a successful annual international conference on issues the oceans face that this year was in Malta. In addition, the State Department had a dissent memo where they disagreed with the US position on Syria wanting something more agressive.
I think Clinton and Gates were closer to the position of most in the State Department recommended. However, Obama set policy. From the emails, it is true that Clinton had a tight group of trusted people who greatly filtered access to Clinton. I would suspect Kerry's 2 chief of staffs similarly did the same.
Neither disrespecter the department as Tillerson did. On every accomplishment, Kerry spoke of how it was the State Department staff that allowed him to accomplish what he did. Both had events that highlighted the work of groups in the department, which is something that supports people.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)C Moon
(12,221 posts)safeinOhio
(32,727 posts)Moscow on the Potomac.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)What is Trump's rationale for this?
DFW
(54,445 posts)He barely knew we had one in the first place, and probably had no clue as to what function they served.
On the other hand, there is good buddy of Tillerson's who knows perfectly well how important an effective foreign ministry (State Department) is to a major country, and what a blow it would be to that country's global relations, both economic and political, if that diplomatic force were to be crippled.
Tillerson is not carrying out Trump's agenda. Tillerson is carrying out Putin's agenda.
And so true.
I can't wait til these corrupt bozos, traitors, and Neo-Nazi lovers get booted out of Washington.
groundloop
(11,523 posts)FakeNoose
(32,777 posts)Further proof of that is that Trump had never met Rex Tillerson when he proposed him for Secretary of State. The two men didn't even know each other except by reputation. The only reason he picked Tillerson is that Pootie wanted him to. Otherwise it would have gone to Ivanka or Jared probably.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)In years gone by poaching those who had worked in Western Europe and Asia was almost impossible, now they're approaching us.
TeamPooka
(24,259 posts)delisen
(6,044 posts)who "vetted" Tillerson by being an immediate public voice backing his nomination. Rice is solidly involved in the world of Big Oil. Vetting Tillerson was a sign that she is more interested in the global oil industry dominance than she is in democracy.
Tillerson is closer to Putin than is Trump and Tillerson is closer to the oil industry than he is to the rest of us.
His method of operation in the state department and his statements reveal him as an authoritarian and as anti-human rights.
We are in a war with Russia and on our way to becoming a vassal state.
Tillerson, like Trump, is implementing Putin's foreign policy. Gutting the US State Department is part of that policy.
It is an anti-female, anti-nonwhite male policy that aims to promote "strongman", authoritarian leaders around the world with the world center in Russia.
Right now there seem to be few Democrats who see or are willing to talk about the main drivers toward this new world order.
Clinton is one. She sees the clear and present danger and is speaking out.
Calls to silence her play into the Russian plan, and are amplified by Russian propaganda.
The Democratic reformists are focused narrowly, possibly because of their lack of comprehensive foreign policy experience. They are focused on the trees nor the forest, which is one reason they were susceptible to Russian propaganda.
Talking about jobs without facing the enormity the verging automation revolution is not helpful.
Income is an issue. Distribution of income is an issue but it must be based upon a foundation of human rights. People who do not have a strong sense of entitlement regard human rights are unlikely to become strong fighters for income equality.
Reforming the Democratic Party is among the least of the issues we need to focus on. Almost, but not all, of the pro-Russia politicians are Republicans.
tomp
(9,512 posts)mdbl
(4,976 posts)they are two peas in a pod.
sadiegirl
(138 posts)Getting rid of all those African-Americans and Hispanics with good paying, meaningful jobs with good benefits. Probably going to replace them with some of those coal miners that refuse to be retrained for anything. Our reputation with the world is shot to hell anyway with Trump at the helm. He is the greatest statesman, anyway. He can do it all by himself.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)I bet Trump would love to pull the same shit on the CIA.
The dude seems to be taking direct orders from Moscow!
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)This is very dangerous.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Many remain in their high fructose corn syrup stupor.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 26, 2017, 11:47 AM - Edit history (1)
the topic a priority, to be extremely understated.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)sale.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)hard to get away from it. As one of my friends was recently saying, before mass communication by the internet, publications often had peer reviews for being factual and some degree of honesty. Also broadcasting to a certain extent (before Fox News and the like.) However, now any yahoo can gain an audience and often by outrageous and false ramblings via mass communications on the internet. And MSM often does little to counter it. And, there is no settling time. Utterances can be heard around the world almost instantaneously.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)peripherally of course. Hopefully, Tillerson's actions fall under Mueller's purview.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I heard sometime back they aren't being filled.
sueh
(1,828 posts)Trump is a fucking moron.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I held the door open to a latent greatness emerging in response to demand, but no. He came in with an agenda that he is pursuing.
And no one ever accused the CEO of Exxon of allowing altruism or patriotism to the nation its headquarters is registered in to limit pursuit of profits.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)agent for our adversary; in short, a traitor. He despises Trump, sure, but Donnie ain't Tillerson's real employer/boss, whom he admires.
Tillerson took the job to get rid of the sanctions against Russia, and then to finalize Exxon's IMMENSE deal with Putin's men.
Global Capitalists know no national patriotism, for they know no national boundaries except as obstacles to get over for business contracts. Indeed, patriotism is to them a sop to chumps, along with the bread and circuses, the better to hoodwink, manipulate, bamboozle, and rob.
Especially rob.
I include the Famiglia Trump in this group.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)it would come to this?
I really hope the scope of Mueller's investigation is able to include Tillerson. The whispers about possible active treason are starting to show up in public. Since he's investigating Kushner's involvement with Israeli settlements and the UN, you'd think so.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Just as dangerous, just as stupid.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)eliminating dept of state means no sanctions will be enforced and also will help with the new world order.
Other depts to be gone by 2020 include education, transportation, housing, HHS, interior, epa. They want tax plan to pass so they can quickly trim the fat to help reduce deficit.