Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,630 posts)
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 07:42 PM Nov 2017

California Democrats vote to make it harder for incumbents to obtain party endorsement

Source: Los Angeles Times

NOV. 19, 2017, 3:24 P.M.
Seema Mehta

California Democratic leaders voted on Sunday to make it harder for incumbents to win the state party’s endorsement, a move that will present an early test in next year’s U.S. Senate race.

The proposal, written by members of the party’s liberal wing, was approved on a voice vote on the final day of the state party’s executive board meeting in Millbrae. Incumbents will now need 60% of party delegates’ votes to win an endorsement, the same amount challengers need. Until now, incumbents needed a simple majority.

Proponents said the move levels the playing field between incumbents and challengers.

Endorsement votes on 2018 races will take place at the party convention in February in San Diego.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-democrats-vote-to-make-it-1511132833-htmlstory.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Democrats vote to make it harder for incumbents to obtain party endorsement (Original Post) Judi Lynn Nov 2017 OP
From the linked article ... left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #1
And a pile of dogshit could be a chocolate souffle if it learned and changed. nt DRoseDARs Nov 2017 #3
whatever that means left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #4
What in her or anyone's experiance would suggest Trump can do either? DRoseDARs Nov 2017 #6
Trump has not showed.... SergeStorms Nov 2017 #7
She's 84 years old. mpcamb Nov 2017 #2
Why don't some want to enjoy their retirement? left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #5
She has power and she enjoys it. bahrbearian Nov 2017 #8
Who is? harun Nov 2017 #9
Sorry. The article features a big-a$$ picture of Feinstein and suggests the rule disfavors her. mpcamb Nov 2017 #10

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
1. From the linked article ...
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 08:07 PM
Nov 2017

“Feinstein has angered some liberal Democrats with her calls for “patience” with President Trump’s presidency,
and her statement that he could be a “good president” if he learned and changed.”

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
6. What in her or anyone's experiance would suggest Trump can do either?
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 09:08 PM
Nov 2017

She really shouldn't have said what she said, and there are no backsies in politics.

SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
7. Trump has not showed....
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 04:42 AM
Nov 2017

that he has the capacity to learn anything. Also, Trump will never change. He's been the same belligerent, entitled, loud-mouthed jackass his entire life, and at his age change is out of the question.

If that's what Di-Fi is waiting for, she may as well retire because it ain't-a-gonna' happen.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
5. Why don't some want to enjoy their retirement?
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 08:42 PM
Nov 2017

I was happy to retire and enjoy some leisure time, travel, etc.

mpcamb

(2,875 posts)
10. Sorry. The article features a big-a$$ picture of Feinstein and suggests the rule disfavors her.
Mon Nov 20, 2017, 06:46 PM
Nov 2017
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California Democrats vote...