Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 11:58 AM Nov 2017

UPDATED: Sessions: 'No clear recollection' of Papadopoulos proposing Trump-Putin meeting

Source: Politico


By POLITICO STAFF 11/14/2017 10:47 AM EST

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday he has "no clear recollection" of what was said at a session at which a Trump campaign associate, George Papadopoulos, proposed organizing a meeting between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Sessions said, however, that he believes he rejected the suggested meeting with Putin.

"I believe that I wanted to make clear to him that he was not authorized to represent the campaign with the Russian government, or any other foreign government, for that matter," Sessions told the House judiciary committee. "But I did not recall this event, which occurred 18 months before my testimony of a few weeks ago, and would gladly have reported it."

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last month to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia-linked people.

###

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/sessions-no-clear-recollection-of-papadopoulos-proposing-trump-putin-meeting-244881



UPDATE

Sessions says he always told the truth in describing Russia contacts


By Matt Zapotosky and Sari Horwitz November 14 at 10:49 AM

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday that he has always told the truth in describing his knowledge of Trump campaign contacts with Russians though he acknowledged he now recalls an interaction with a lower-level Trump adviser who has said he told Sessions about contacts who could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

When asked previously about whether he believed surrogates from the Trump campaign had communications with the Russians, Sessions said, speaking before the House Judiciary Committee. I did not, and Im not aware of anyone else that did, and I dont believe it happened.

Now, Sessions said he recalled a March 2016 meeting with Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos, in pleading guilty to lying to FBI agents, has admitted he told Trump and a group of other campaign officials, including Sessions, that he had contacts who could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Putin.

I do now recall the March 2016 meeting at Trump Hotel that Mr. Papadopoulos attended, but I have no clear recollection of the details of what he said at that meeting, Sessions said. After reading his account, and to the best of my recollection, I believe that I wanted to make clear to him that he was not authorized to represent the campaign with the Russian government, or any other foreign government, for that matter. But I did not recall this event, which occurred 18 months before my testimony of a few weeks ago, and I would gladly have reported it had I remembered it because I pushed back against his suggestion that I thought may have been improper.

The House committees top Democrat vowed to press him about his and other former Trump campaign aides dealings with Russians leading up to the 2016 election. In his opening statement, U.S. Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) went through Sessionss public statements on Russia-related matters, highlighting instances in which what Sessions said did not comport with other evidence.

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-likely-to-be-questioned-about-trump-campaign-dealings-with-russians-at-house-judiciary-hearing/2017/11/13/bc20b7fc-c894-11e7-aa96-54417592cf72_story.html
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATED: Sessions: 'No clear recollection' of Papadopoulos proposing Trump-Putin meeting (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2017 OP
If this guy can't remember meetings titaniumsalute Nov 2017 #1
+1 bagelsforbreakfast Nov 2017 #4
Then Trump appoints somebody as AG NewJeffCT Nov 2017 #7
My immediate thought exactly. KPN Nov 2017 #9
I don't remember, but if I did, I would have said no? marylandblue Nov 2017 #2
yep jberryhill Nov 2017 #3
Poor Jeffy, he thought the recusal would get him out of trouble FakeNoose Nov 2017 #11
How about a Fuzzy itcfish Nov 2017 #5
But what about Hillary's emails? Botany Nov 2017 #6
They've been using "I can't remember" since Nixon... malthaussen Nov 2017 #8
It's not a lie... if you believe it. GeorgeGist Nov 2017 #10
But a bit ago didn't the elf say he pushed back on papa in that meeting when he brought it up? KewlKat Nov 2017 #12
"No clear recollection' No CLEAR recollection. mpcamb Nov 2017 #13
how many lies under oath does it take a republican to get in touble with our gov't????? VaBchTgerLily Nov 2017 #14
I can answer that it's 1000 but bluestarone Nov 2017 #15
what the fuck ever happened to bluestarone Nov 2017 #16
How did this man ever pass the bar? YessirAtsaFact Nov 2017 #17

KPN

(15,650 posts)
9. My immediate thought exactly.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:24 PM
Nov 2017

Shouldn't at least one Dem on the committee make that point during today's hearing? I hope so. It really does raise that obvious question about basic competence with regard to performing the job, no?

FakeNoose

(32,748 posts)
11. Poor Jeffy, he thought the recusal would get him out of trouble
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:52 PM
Nov 2017

This is only the beginning, Sessions!



Botany

(70,581 posts)
6. But what about Hillary's emails?
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 12:17 PM
Nov 2017

"no clear recollection" = of course it happened

Sessions says he, "always told the truth in describing Russia contacts ...."

mpcamb

(2,875 posts)
13. "No clear recollection' No CLEAR recollection.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:30 PM
Nov 2017

The word 'clear' acts as a qualifier, if your intent is to lie your worthless butt off.
Keep asking till it's out and out lying.

VaBchTgerLily

(231 posts)
14. how many lies under oath does it take a republican to get in touble with our gov't?????
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

wouldn't any one else be in serious shit by now????

bluestarone

(17,030 posts)
15. I can answer that it's 1000 but
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 03:53 PM
Nov 2017

if you reach 1000 then you get another 1000 then if you reach that you go UNLIMITED (Rthugs rule ONLY THO)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATED: Sessions: 'No c...