Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 01:50 PM Nov 2017

Trump judge nominee, 36, who has never tried a case, wins approval of Senate panel

Source: LA Times

Brett J. Talley, President Trump’s nominee to be a federal judge in Alabama, has never tried a case, was unanimously rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Assn.’s judicial rating committee, has practiced law for only three years and, as a blogger last year, displayed a degree of partisanship unusual for a judicial nominee, denouncing “Hillary Rotten Clinton” and pledging support for the National Rifle Assn.

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee, on a party-line vote, approved him for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.

Talley, 36, is part of what Trump has called the “untold story” of his success in filling the courts with young conservatives.

“The judge story is an untold story. Nobody wants to talk about it,” Trump said last month, standing alongside Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in the White House Rose Garden. “But when you think of it, Mitch and I were saying, that has consequences 40 years out, depending on the age of the judge — but 40 years out.”

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-judge-20171110-story.html



40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump judge nominee, 36, who has never tried a case, wins approval of Senate panel (Original Post) n2doc Nov 2017 OP
when we get control of the government back into sane hands lapfog_1 Nov 2017 #1
Impeach the MF'ers n2doc Nov 2017 #4
Doubtful. nt 7962 Nov 2017 #7
Why is it doubtful? He is clearly unqualified. n/t rainin Nov 2017 #10
considering someone unqualified isn't an impeachable offense; its subjective. 7962 Nov 2017 #19
I may have misunderstood rainin Nov 2017 #25
Now that is certainly possible! 7962 Nov 2017 #37
Could the House create a bunch of judicial seats maxrandb Nov 2017 #28
No judge in any court should have a lifetime appointment. democratisphere Nov 2017 #2
Agreed!!!! 7962 Nov 2017 #6
Agree djg21 Nov 2017 #22
there is no quality in Trump's picks Angry Dragon Nov 2017 #3
Next time you see someone praising Senator Flake, remind them of his voting record n2doc Nov 2017 #5
I knew it. Jeff Flake & Ben Sasse are just giving bullshit lip service to speaking against 45* catbyte Nov 2017 #24
When this seditious plague is over defacto7 Nov 2017 #8
With a rubber stamp, we approve of trump crimes republicans. liberal N proud Nov 2017 #9
Email, call, FB and/or tweet every one of the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Comm and ask Fla Dem Nov 2017 #11
I think that last one is the only 'qualification' they care about n/t n2doc Nov 2017 #14
Thanks. Just sent an angry, but no bad language, email OldHippieChick Nov 2017 #27
He still has to face the full Senate jmowreader Nov 2017 #12
I will predict 50-50, with pence breaking the tie n2doc Nov 2017 #13
That only assumes Rand Paul makes a trip in BumRushDaShow Nov 2017 #16
I am assuming that. I am also assuming that Collins votes FOR this asshat n/t n2doc Nov 2017 #17
There was some votes recently that I saw posted on DU BumRushDaShow Nov 2017 #18
So do they still need to have 50 votes maxrandb Nov 2017 #29
For routine confirmations (nowadays), no. Just a majority. nt BumRushDaShow Nov 2017 #33
Trump ridiculous amount of judicial appointees will punish us for decades IronLionZion Nov 2017 #15
I know, but both parties are the same maxrandb Nov 2017 #30
Jeez, is that really the best he can come up with? MGKrebs Nov 2017 #20
OK, so all that stuff they used to tell blacks and women about needing "experience" or mamas Nov 2017 #21
I guess it's time for McCain and the other so-called 'sane' senators to ink up their rubber stamps. PSPS Nov 2017 #23
Honestly, Delphinus Nov 2017 #26
Because their only mandate form their voters maxrandb Nov 2017 #31
He passed the only test necessary... BlueIdaho Nov 2017 #32
Elections have consequences.... Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #34
Well, isn't that special xxqqqzme Nov 2017 #35
When you have a dotard as president Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2017 #36
Any Senator with a law degree who voted to approve Brett J. Talley should be disbarred. nt fleabiscuit Nov 2017 #38
Real story is only 3 years practicing. Not trying a case is less of an issue for me. Justice Nov 2017 #39
Kick Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2017 #40

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
1. when we get control of the government back into sane hands
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 01:52 PM
Nov 2017

we will need to find every last one of Trumps judges and offer them bribes to leave

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
4. Impeach the MF'ers
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 01:58 PM
Nov 2017

They will undoubtedly have given cause to do so by then. Starting with Gorsuch.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
19. considering someone unqualified isn't an impeachable offense; its subjective.
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 03:20 PM
Nov 2017

You can be a SCOTUS judge without ever hearing a case.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
25. I may have misunderstood
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 04:51 PM
Nov 2017

I thought the ideas was that by the time he has presided in his position for a few years, there would be something he could be impeached for, if someone looked. It is unlikely he will get it right all the time.

What an injustice if he is allowed to keep his position.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
28. Could the House create a bunch of judicial seats
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 05:20 PM
Nov 2017

And fill them with sane people? Doesn't the House control the funding? Cut them off.

There simply has to be a way to fix this. Get a super majority in the Senate and impeach the living fuck out of anyone Donnie Short Fingers and the treasonous Retrumplicans have put in these positions.

I've always said that it's great that the United States doesn't jail political opponents when we have a change in government... now I'm not so sure

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
2. No judge in any court should have a lifetime appointment.
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 01:54 PM
Nov 2017

It can only lead to an overindulged and jaded judiciary.

 

djg21

(1,803 posts)
22. Agree
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 04:16 PM
Nov 2017

Lifetime appointments may have worked when the Constitution was written and the average life expectancy was shorter (35 years in 1776). But the average life expectancy is close to 80 now, and this creates a race to the bottom, in which Presidents of both parties attempt to appoint the youngest possible ideologue, while bypassing older constitutional scholars, so that they may have a more enduring impact on the Court. I’d like to see an Amendment to the Constitution imposing a single term of 20 - 25 years for SCOTUS justices with a mandatory retirement age of 80.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
5. Next time you see someone praising Senator Flake, remind them of his voting record
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:00 PM
Nov 2017

He is a member of the panel that just approved of this asshat.

Judiciary Panel Republican members:

Chuck Grassley, Iowa, Chairman
Orrin Hatch, Utah
Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
John Cornyn, Texas
Mike Lee, Utah
Ted Cruz, Texas
Ben Sasse, Nebraska
Jeff Flake, Arizona
Mike Crapo, Idaho
Thom Tillis, North Carolina
John Neely Kennedy, Louisiana

catbyte

(34,403 posts)
24. I knew it. Jeff Flake & Ben Sasse are just giving bullshit lip service to speaking against 45*
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 04:40 PM
Nov 2017

excesses, yet fall right in line when they vote. What a sick joke they are.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
8. When this seditious plague is over
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:05 PM
Nov 2017

there will be a way to rid our government of the vermin and unqualified persons inhabiting these posts. I swear, there will be.

We cannot be enslaved to mindless ideologists who want to banish peaceful existance and a healthy planet in trade for greed and delusion.

We will find a way.

Fla Dem

(23,691 posts)
11. Email, call, FB and/or tweet every one of the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Comm and ask
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:35 PM
Nov 2017

what qualifications does this man have that you found acceptable to approve him for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.

-Never Tried a case
-Only a Lawyer for 3 years
-Unanimously rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Assn.’s judicial rating committee
-Has displayed overt partisanship re: NRA and Democrats

Here are the members

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
12. He still has to face the full Senate
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

He only needs a simple majority, and so far this Senate has been resistant to Trump’s stupider ideas...like putting someone who hasn’t been in a real courtroom yet on the federal bench.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
13. I will predict 50-50, with pence breaking the tie
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:39 PM
Nov 2017

So far the Senate Repubs have been more than willing to vote for these asshat judges. Including the 'moderates'.

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
18. There was some votes recently that I saw posted on DU
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 03:19 PM
Nov 2017

that were 49 - 47. So there are folks not voting and/or not around. There were a couple nominations voted on the past couple days that had that type of split - https://www.senate.gov/legislative/votes.htm

Paul hasn't voted the past week and Pat Roberts (R-KS) has skipped some of the nomination votes too (as well as Tester & Menendez who I know is in a trial).

IronLionZion

(45,455 posts)
15. Trump ridiculous amount of judicial appointees will punish us for decades
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 02:45 PM
Nov 2017

since he packs the courts with young extreme conservatives for lifetime appointments fundamentally altering the judicial future of this country in a very shitty way. A future Dem president or Congress is going to have our agenda blocked by these judges for a very long time.

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
20. Jeez, is that really the best he can come up with?
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 03:32 PM
Nov 2017

He couldn't find some partisan, racist, sycophant who at least had some experience?

 

mamas

(76 posts)
21. OK, so all that stuff they used to tell blacks and women about needing "experience" or
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 03:36 PM
Nov 2017

education or other qualifications was nothing more than a way to keep us out of good-paying jobs.

PSPS

(13,601 posts)
23. I guess it's time for McCain and the other so-called 'sane' senators to ink up their rubber stamps.
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 04:35 PM
Nov 2017

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
31. Because their only mandate form their voters
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 05:30 PM
Nov 2017

Was to cause harm.

Retrumplican voters were promised that if they elected Retrumplicans, they would hurt people that they wanted to be hurt.

That's it. That's their entire agenda. Vote for us and we promise to hurt the people you want us to hurt.

Of course they never tell their voters that quite a few of them will be collateral damage.

That's why my go to statement to Retrumplican voters echoes their Supreme leader...go Fuck yourselves

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
32. He passed the only test necessary...
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 06:30 PM
Nov 2017

He promised to blindly follow the orders of his GOP bosses. As long as he does that, he’s golden.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
35. Well, isn't that special
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 08:39 PM
Nov 2017

King con an no lips mitch will be long gone in 40 years, but my grandchildren will have to suffer these selected fools

Justice

(7,188 posts)
39. Real story is only 3 years practicing. Not trying a case is less of an issue for me.
Sun Nov 12, 2017, 05:03 AM
Nov 2017

One can be a great business attorney and be a great judge. I know one. But he had years of experience as a lawyer.

A person with 3 years experience becoming a federal district court judge? Ridiculous.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump judge nominee, 36, ...