Rand Paul is not a perfect neighbor, says community developer
Source: USA Today
The history between U.S. Sen. Rand Paul and his neighbor, who is accused of attacking him, is filled with years of angst and petty arguments over misplaced lawn trimmings and branches, the neighborhood's developer said.
"I think this is something that has been festering," said Jim Skaggs, the developer of the Rivergreen gated community in Bowling Green, where the two men live. "I wanted to build a place where everyone could get along, but I guess that's just impossible."
Paul suffered five broken ribs and lacerations on his lungs after his neighbor, 59-year-old retired doctor Rene Boucher, allegedly tackled the politician last week, according to an arrest warrant obtained by the Courier Journal.
Kentucky State Police charged Boucher with fourth-degree assault, which is usually reserved for incidents that result in minor injuries. If federal charges are added, Boucher could potentially face 10 years in prison for physically attacking a politician.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/07/rand-paul-not-perfect-neighbor-says-community-developer/841622001/
"Not a perfect neighbor" is the polite way of saying he's the asshole of the neighborhood.
Siwsan
(26,292 posts)That just seems like an incredibly passive/aggressive decision.
Zorro
(15,749 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)buy a place next door to one of "those French surrender monkeys"?
You know how these hyper-patrioitic, super-Americans despise the French. Paul should have built a "freedom wall" between their properties to keep the riff-raff out.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)but stupid to move into a planned community with an HOA in the first place.
brush
(53,871 posts)Fla Dem
(23,761 posts)community with HOA regulations? Why should their positions supersede the othe owners?
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)but still want to be a selfish bastard
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)Congrats on writing the perfect definition of a Libertarian Republican!
skypilot
(8,854 posts)What are some of the amenities? When I think of HOAs I think of lots and lots of rules, but what are the amenities that people get in return?
FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)and I can tell you the reasons. HOAs are the best kept neighborhoods you can find because of the rules and regulations. You won't find junk cars parked in front of the homes or rundown, unkempt yards. When you drive into one you think to yourself - "this is the kind of neighborhood I want to live in." There is always some a-hole though, who moves in, signs all the papers that pledge to follow the rules and then proceed to try to break every one. They think the rules don't apply to them.
When I was younger I never would have lived in an HOA. Now, pushing 80, I like it.
skypilot
(8,854 posts)...the aesthetic pleasures of the neighborhood that result from following the rules? I live in a wonderful neighborhood that doesn't have junk cars and unkempt yards, etc. and I don't belong to an HOA.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)maintains lifeguards at the swimming pools
sponsors a swim team which means that neighborhood families meet regularly and work together
holds neighborhood social events like memorial day barbeque...
has a small playground..
sponsors halloween refreshment stands for parents including bonfire
gives out the glowy things for children to wear while trick or treating
skypilot
(8,854 posts)Can't say that I have a swimming pool where I live.
brush
(53,871 posts)Without it you can get people working on cars in the driveway, cars on blocks in front of houses, unkempt lawns, people renting out rooms to who knows who, big commercial trucks parked on the streets, people trying to run unlicensed day cares to make their mortgage payment people try to get away with all kinds of sketchy stuff, even prostitution, without regard to quality of life for their neighbors.
skypilot
(8,854 posts)*
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)(because probably 97% of the houses here have their own) but our HOA does maintain miles of bike/jogging trails, several parks and playgrounds throughout the area, a community center that can be rented for most anything and where they also hold events (Halloween/Christmas/other holiday things) and I'm sure other things but we have only been here a few months so not sure about everything.
I had an unfavorable opinion of HOAs on principle but I inherited this house from my Grandpa and it's much nicer than our old house so we sold the old one and moved in. HOA life does take some getting used to - I was definitely a touch more lax about how often I mowed the lawn at the old house and trash can rules here were a bit much at first - but the dues are pretty cheap here and it's not so hard to maintain it. The neighborhood is beautiful with a pretty diverse mix of residents.
Then again, my old neighborhood had all of the typical crap - bad lawns, junk cars, code enforcement trucks trawling through looking for violations that were mostly ignored and I actually didn't mind most of it. I figured folks had shit to do and maybe couldn't keep up with everything all the time so I lived and let live. My immediate neighbors were all decent people who never bothered us. The lady across the street had been there since before me (I lived there 30+ years) and she cried when we told her we were moving out.
But my Grandpa lived in this house for a little over 40 years and he was one of the first to build here (He bought the place when no houses were built yet) and most of his neighbors have welcomed us warmly so I have a built-in nice community. I'll just be glad when we finish all our remodeling and get things settled so I can start returning all the neighborliness.
FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)to live in a place like that without an HOA, but you never know when a neighbor from hell will move in next to you and you won't be able to do anything about it.
Criminal background investigations are done before the buyer gets consent to purchase here and that keeps some problems from ever developing in the first place.
My HOA has a swimming pool, clubhouse, organized groups for golf, bowling, cards, shuffleboard, veterans, etc., etc.
For some people HOAs are good. If you have an independent streak and want to paint your house orange and purple, it's best to stay away from HOAs.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)will necessarily get eyesore problems. But the HOA provides a legal means to address issues that ruin property values.
I have lived in good middle class neighborhoods. But sometimes a renter or someone who has little pride moves in and doesn't take care of their property, or the landlord doesn't. They let yards go to hell, build sandboxes in front yards, leave out broken toys (kids' or adults's), let paint flake, leave garbage cans out front 24/7, etc., and then the whole area looks trashed out. HOAs provide remedies.
I am living in an HOA community. I follow the rules because they are for my good and the good of the community. Sounds a little socialistic, doesn't it? I use the pool here in the community rather than build one in the backyard or drive to a public pool in the county. Other folks use the tennis courts, playground, etc.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)that a puke politician who has a history of contrariness in the performance of his elected office gets embroiled in a dispute that he is unable to resolve peaceably.
And I'm not excusing the behavior of his neighbor, just pointing out that it's suggestive that Paul gets involved in something like this.
mpcamb
(2,878 posts)drugs.
There's ~ a 10% abuse hx in people in that field. That's the reported number.
I'm probably a fool for saying this but it's accurate.
Nitram
(22,890 posts)You're getting way ahead of the story.
mpcamb
(2,878 posts)I did say 'likely', and I'd stick to that.
It's a line of work that has a high abuse rate. The '10% known and treated' figure came from an anesthesiologist at a conference for anesthetists I attended.
It's a field where you have the keys and the count on the meds.
I don't know how well it's acknowledged but it's there, for sure.
Nitram
(22,890 posts)Probably better to wait for the facts. Many people these days take speculation as fact and run with it.
mpcamb
(2,878 posts)Nitram
(22,890 posts)I'm not a violent person, but I confess to feeling a bit of sympathy forsomeone who just couldn't take it anymore. Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mitch McConnell, and Paul Ryan are smarmy, hypocritical, sneaky scumbags of the worst sort, who are putting the lives and livelihoods off millions of Americans in grave danger.
mpcamb
(2,878 posts)Ilsa
(61,698 posts)He was certainly wrong to attack his neighbor physically like this.
Rand Paul has a serious health problem now: pleural effusion. He may have needed a thoracotomy to drain the fluid from the pleural space so he can breath easier. If my neighbor attacked me and I was hurt this badly, I'd sue the hell out of him.
Nasruddin
(754 posts)is your just desserts for not being a perfect neighbor?
There had better be one helluva story to justify that level of assault.
ProfessorGAC
(65,195 posts)And, we've only heard one version so far.
I'm taking a "wait and see" position on this.
Nitram
(22,890 posts)neighbor's yard) and a bad politician (trying to repeal Obamacare).
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)Unless the Dr fell on Rand.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)Paul has fluid collecting in the pleural space, compressing a lung (or lungs). He may have needed a thoracotomy to drain the fluid, culture it, perhaps. He has probably been in a lot of pain. I'd sue the crap out of a neighbor who hurt me this badly.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Called It LOL
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/10029804386#post13
You don't mess with another man's well kept yard!
dembotoz
(16,839 posts)Paladin
(28,275 posts)If you move to a gated community, you'd better be prepared for community rules, as enforced by a home owners' association. The overwhelming majority of functioning adults are capable of this---but there's always a jerk or two in the neighborhood who feels compelled to make trouble. I've seen it time and again.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)Defeat him in court or at the ballot box but physical violence should never be applauded.
Though Rand may have been merely the loser, i.e., willing to fight, just didn't get the best of the other guy.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)but honestly every excuse to accept a violent attack
ProfessorGAC
(65,195 posts)Says who? Rand Paul, that's who!
We don't know that for sure.
treestar
(82,383 posts)But enjoy your superiority.
crosinski
(412 posts)Not guilty until proven, and all that.
Kaleva
(36,354 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Bayard
(22,157 posts)Tatiana
(14,167 posts)I thought I read somewhere that this condition is actually worse than originally thought and he has 6 broken (displaced) ribs. Boucher might be charged with a felony due to the severity of Paul's injuries, which were originally thought to be minor.
I am wondering if Boucher and Paul had a relationship between themselves.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)The anesthesiologist would know. Pleural effusion is fluid collecting in the pleural space and compressing the lung. It's sscary and painful. Paul may have needed a thoracotomy to relieve the pressure. I'd sue someone for causing me this much pain, especially if the criminal charges amounted to nothing. Violence is not the answer.