Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:38 PM Nov 2017

Navajo Nation Votes Down Controversial Hotel and Tram Project at Grand Canyon

Source: NBC News

NOV 1 2017, 7:20 PM ET
by CHIARA SOTTILE



After years of controversy, the Navajo Nation rejected plans to build a 420-acre tourist attraction and gondola tram ride on the undeveloped east rim of the Grand Canyon — an area sacred to the Navajo Nation.

In a special session of the Navajo Nation Council on Tuesday, the Council voted against the so-called Grand Canyon Escalade Project that would have drawn an estimated 5 million annual tourists to the Grand Canyon National Park, and which would have cost the Navajo Nation $65 million to build roads and other infrastructure.

The proposed site for the attraction was known as "the confluence," where the Colorado River meets the Little Colorado River on the canyon's east side. Plans proposed by developers Confluence Partners LLC included an IMAX theater, retail shops, hotels, and a gondola tram ride that would take visitors 1.6 miles to the canyon floor in ten minutes.

The project would have been on Navajo land and the developer was waiting for approval before proceeding, and Tuesday's vote means the company does not have permission from the Naajo Nation. Confluence Partners did not respond to multiple requests for comment Wednesday.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/navajo-nation-votes-down-controversial-hotel-tram-project-grand-canyon-n816666





27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Navajo Nation Votes Down Controversial Hotel and Tram Project at Grand Canyon (Original Post) Judi Lynn Nov 2017 OP
Excellent! Achilleaze Nov 2017 #1
There is a short video at the link showing a mock up of the proposed development riversedge Nov 2017 #2
YES. Important to watch. janx Nov 2017 #8
They were one of the last hold outs to get a casino off i40 east of Flagstaff notdarkyet Nov 2017 #17
I know, but at what cost to them? janx Nov 2017 #18
The story I heard this morning made it seem less about the ecological damage sweetloukillbot Nov 2017 #27
Good! Mendocino Nov 2017 #3
GOOD!!! ailsagirl Nov 2017 #4
Good for them shows they're not interested in the almighty dollar blueinredohio Nov 2017 #5
And there is much poverty in the Navajo Nation. janx Nov 2017 #9
I sound like a grade school teacher in this post, I know... janx Nov 2017 #22
Good news!! nt 2naSalit Nov 2017 #6
Good for them! coolsandy Nov 2017 #7
Good. We don't need a giant resort in Grand Canyon. PatrickforO Nov 2017 #10
Great news. Mother Nature can't be outdone. TheCowsCameHome Nov 2017 #11
Exactly. LisaM Nov 2017 #12
There's one in Tuscan close to the main entrance. Been there at least twenty five years. notdarkyet Nov 2017 #19
Hallelujah! Duppers Nov 2017 #13
Good news Hekate Nov 2017 #14
I spend a lot of time with the Navajo and Hopi .. DemoTex Nov 2017 #15
You can't imagine how beautiful those 2 images are to someone who's never seen the area. Judi Lynn Nov 2017 #23
Gorgeous Bayard Nov 2017 #24
Thank goodness! mountain grammy Nov 2017 #16
Awesome! I've been following this a long time osaMABUSh Nov 2017 #20
great news but bluestarone Nov 2017 #21
One of my concerns Bayard Nov 2017 #25
YES!!!!!!! burrowowl Nov 2017 #26

notdarkyet

(2,226 posts)
17. They were one of the last hold outs to get a casino off i40 east of Flagstaff
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 09:17 PM
Nov 2017

Called twin arrows. They didn't want to do that and I'm sure really don't want to be overwhelmed by millions. They live without water and electricity so they can have nature and solitude. The confluence is a beautiful and very sacred spot.

janx

(24,128 posts)
18. I know, but at what cost to them?
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 09:28 PM
Nov 2017

The poverty is unbelievable. It's not easy and leads to hard competition and crime. There must be a better way for them--maybe ecotourism *outside* of their sacred spaces. ? There are places here in NM that I feel strongly about in the same way.

sweetloukillbot

(11,028 posts)
27. The story I heard this morning made it seem less about the ecological damage
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 11:16 PM
Nov 2017

And more about the fact that it didn't bring enough money to the tribe - that there were too many concessions to make it worthwhile.

Mendocino

(7,495 posts)
3. Good!
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:52 PM
Nov 2017

I'm tired of the disneyation of our natural wonders. Nice photo of the Little Colorado, the water really is that aqua color.

janx

(24,128 posts)
9. And there is much poverty in the Navajo Nation.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 08:17 PM
Nov 2017

It's extreme, which makes this decision even more important.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
10. Good. We don't need a giant resort in Grand Canyon.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 08:21 PM
Nov 2017

Sacred space is more important than lining some capitalist's pocket with profits.

Human life is more important than profit.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
12. Exactly.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 08:42 PM
Nov 2017

What kind of beggared imagination would someone have to have to want an IMAX at the Grand Canyon?

DemoTex

(25,399 posts)
15. I spend a lot of time with the Navajo and Hopi ..
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 09:01 PM
Nov 2017

I love their land. But I get permits before I do photography there. I am not at all surprised about this decision. But many more battles loom, especially about coal. And I fear for the land between Page and Tuba City, in general, and Coal Mine Canyon in particular.

Coal Mine Canyon (Navajo Nation sanctioned shoot in May, 2017, by DemoTex):





And my new Coal Mine Canyon sweatshirt (NFS):

BACK


Front:

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
23. You can't imagine how beautiful those 2 images are to someone who's never seen the area.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:01 PM
Nov 2017

They are amazing.

Thank you, so much.

osaMABUSh

(2,195 posts)
20. Awesome! I've been following this a long time
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 09:36 PM
Nov 2017

I am relieved that the Grand Canyon will not be tarnished with a Disney like theme park. Earlier this year (February) I hiked down to the bottom and stayed at the Phantom Ranch. A truly spiritual trek! I plan on another hike in April to PR and also a Havasupai Falls trip in Sept.

I realize that the site of the proposed Tram was at the other end (East) of the Canyon than where I have been but just the thought of it sickened me. The solitude and the beauty of this place will remain eternal. The environmental nightmare with the construction and throngs of people has been avoided and this vote ensures that one still actually has to work (i.e., hike) to get to there and can't just buy a ride to the bottom for a 'drive-by' tourist thrill.

Bayard

(22,099 posts)
25. One of my concerns
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:48 PM
Nov 2017

The article says this would have been on Navajo land. I'm wondering if it is actually owned by the tribe, or is tied up with the BLM? If that is the case, I'm afraid their vote will not matter much. We know the current government attitude toward what is sacred to other people.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navajo Nation Votes Down ...