White House opioid commission calls for wide-ranging changes to anti-drug policies
Source: The Washington Post
By Lenny Bernstein November 1 at 2:15 PM
President Trump's commission on the opioid crisis called Wednesday for a nationwide system of drug courts and easier access to alternatives to opioids for people in pain, part of a wide-ranging menu of upgrades it said are needed to curb the opioid epidemic.
The commission, headed by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), called for expanding drug courts an alternative system that tries to channel substance abusers accused of crimes into treatment into all 93 federal court jurisdictions.
The report came six days after Trump declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency, which the commission had urged in its interim report released in July. That designation allows Trump to direct all federal agencies to speed aid to cities and states in the grip of what he called the worst drug crisis in American history.
One important step he signaled was a decision to have the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services waive a 1970s-era policy that blocked Medicaid payments to inpatient treatment facilities with more than 16 substance-abuse beds. That should make treatment more widely available. Trump also said the Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security are strengthening package inspections in an attempt to reduce the flow of the street drug fentanyl, much of which is synthesized in China, sent to the United States and mixed with powdered heroin by dealers.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/11/01/white-house-opioid-commission-calls-for-wide-ranging-changes-to-anti-drug-policies
AJT
(5,240 posts)treatment instead of prison.......after all a lot of them are poor GOP voters and we wouldn't want them losing their voting privileges.
they gotta be ready to go back to work when Twitler brings back all of their coal mining jobs!
get the red out
(13,466 posts)But will people be treated with proven methods for their addiction, or will just anyone be able to set up a "treatment" center and make $$$?
Blackjackdavey
(178 posts)by "proven methods?" None of the things under consideration are new. We have an outpatient facility, we have also opened an ambulatory detox center (thanks Obamacare!) and we have not one but two (individual and family) treatment courts in our tiny rural community. Apparently, there are communities that lack all of those things -- but none of them are re-creating the wheel. It should be easy to expand the model federally. The trick is, that you alluded to, is knowing what you're doing -- But not the treatment itself but the structure and the flow. Too many operations get that part wrong which makes it impossible to make money, which makes it impossible to stay open, which makes it impossible to help people.
Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)Anyone with that much responsibility for the safety and health of US Citizens should be required to do so with a clear head and clean bloodstream. If they need to test police, airline pilots, truckers and clerks at the 7-11 they certainly should be doing the same at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)Otherwise, they wouldn't continue to destroy the ACA.
Blackjackdavey
(178 posts)Inpatient is highly ineffective and very expensive. If you care about lowering healthcare costs and getting smarter with our health care dollars -- this is the wrong place to look.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)Blackjackdavey
(178 posts)disparage something that worked for your brother -- I'm glad it did. I am arguing there are better, more efficient methods that may have worked more quickly or sooner Most folks have multiple rehab stays before it takes and the success is almost always because they finally stuck it out and entered a halfway house. Therefore, I am advocating for a community based, straight to halfway house scenario rather than the current, bloated, stop at inpatient first model.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)You can't force it in any scenario.
Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)that is why he picked the best man for the job. Really?