Trump: If NFL had suspended Kaepernick we wouldn't have 'a problem'
Source: The Hill
President Trump said in an interview scheduled to air Wednesday night that the current controversy over protests in the NFL would not be a problem had the NFL originally suspended Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during the national anthem.
I watched Colin Kaepernick and I thought it was terrible. And then it got bigger and bigger and started mushrooming. And frankly the NFL should have suspended him for one game and he would have never done it again, Trump told Fox News Hannity.
They could have then suspended him for two games and they could have suspended him again if he did it a third time, for the season, and you would never have had a problem," he said. "But I will tell you - you cannot disrespect our country, our flag, our anthem, you cannot do that.
The comments from the president are his latest response to a controversy that has stretched over several weeks since Trump first suggested NFL owners fire players who choose to kneel, rather than stand, during the national anthem.
-snip-
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/355041-trump-if-nfl-had-suspended-kaepernick-we-wouldnt-have-a-problem
bucolic_frolic
(43,252 posts)He's consistent, you've got to give him that
Sneederbunk
(14,297 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Damn it gets so old !
Podkayne K
(145 posts)hadn't been head of the FBI, we wouldn't have a MORON teething in the White House.
rurallib
(62,433 posts)we wouldn't have this problem.
That needs to be shouted from the tallest buildings.
ffr
(22,671 posts)YES!
unblock
(52,286 posts)kneeling before royalty shows no disrespect.
kneeling while praying shows no disrespect.
kneeling when proposing shows no disrespect.
if anything, it conveys the opposite
right-wing snowflakes are simply lying to claim to be offended.
they're offended because a black person is complaining about black people getting killed for no good reason.
not because he's kneeling, but because he's pointing out something they want to sweep under the carpet.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)They_Live
(3,239 posts)kneeling shows reverence.
madokie
(51,076 posts)We must not give in
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,152 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Rollo
(2,559 posts).
MontanaMama
(23,334 posts)I am SO angry tonight. This shit has to stop. Somebody had to start the 25th amendment thing. Why does NOBODY in a prominent position stand up to this MORON? WHY? He can't do anything, he is impotent if people stand up to him.
In other news, I just heard a general on Chris Hayes (didn't get his name, I'm cooking dinner) state that Dotard has a "screw loose". OMG! I am thinking it would be irresponsible to NOT have a talk with my middle schooler about having a family emergency plan in place in case he does the unthinkable.
DK504
(3,847 posts)When the hell did this Moron think this started, last week?
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)And yes it gives us the right to demonstratively express ourselves.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)madville
(7,412 posts)within the terms of their agreed upon collective bargaining agreement. The 1st Amendment of the Constitution has no weight in a private employee/employer relationship just like any other private job, people get legally (and many times rightfully) fired or disciplined at work for things like social media posts all the time, it's not a 1st Amendment issue.
raccoon
(31,117 posts)If More people had voted against DT instead of voting third-party or staying home, we wouldn't have a problem.
mpcamb
(2,873 posts)jalan48
(13,879 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,835 posts)REMEMBER, this is Donald's world, we are just burning in it.
ffr
(22,671 posts)Be ready for impeachment or worse, Dotard!
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)world wide wally
(21,751 posts)onenote
(42,737 posts)The VP and either a majority on the cabinet or the majority of a body convened for the purpose of determining whether the president is able to discharge the duties and obligations of the office must concur
Best_man23
(4,907 posts)The NFL would not have enough front line and reserve players to air more than 3 or 4 games.
African American players threatened to boycott the 1965 AFL All Star game because of how the host city (New Orleans) treated them. The AFL moved the All Star game to Houston as a result. Boycotts work. I could see current players deciding to not play for teams and owners who appear to be sucking up to Cheetolini.
Lotusflower70
(3,077 posts)I hope he enjoyed the $3.76 He got from his lawsuit against the NFL. What a dumbass.
DBoon
(22,395 posts)We would eliminate much bigger problem than a few football players kneeling before the US flag
BeyondGeography
(39,377 posts)This issue is a winnah, I tell you. A win-nah.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Tell the Hill.
https://georgelakoff.com/2016/12/15/how-to-help-trump/
Nobody knows this better than Trump. Trump, as a media master, knows how to frame a debate. When he picks a fight, he does so deliberately. He tweets or says outrageous things, knowing they will be repeated millions and millions of times. When the news media and Democrats repeat Trumps frames, they are strengthening those frames by ensuring that tens of millions of Americans hear them repeated over and over again.
Better headline and post title:
"Trump tries to distract from racism, Puerto Rico disaster, Russia - with more old NFL crap."
GusBob
(7,286 posts)He has captured the attention economy.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Attention economy is exactly right.
News outlets will have to figure out a way to deal with efforts to deflect attention away from what is important.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)He made it a problem and he did it on purpose to divide the country
Evertytime this asshole speaks, Putin laughs
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)BHDem53
(1,061 posts)until the dotard is ousted from office.
Rollo
(2,559 posts).
Smickey
(3,334 posts)take action against the first amendment rights of the players, President Obama should be their lawyer and if necessary take it to the Supreme Court. He was a constitutional law professor at Harvard right?
madville
(7,412 posts)The government is not restricting their speech. Just like when politicians "talk" about restricting gun rights, it's not actually violating the 2nd Amendment because it's just talk.
Their employer, the team/NFL, has the right to discipline the players or terminate their employment within the terms of their collective bargaining agreement. The 1st Amendment does not protect speech within a private employee/employer relationship.
Initech
(100,097 posts)And of course we have a president who watches way too much Fox News for his own good. Combine the two things, and well...