State Department and Pentagon Plan for Post-Assad Syria
Source: The New York Times
Even with fighting raging in Syria and President Bashar al-Assad digging in, the State Department and Pentagon are quietly sharpening plans to cope with a flood of refugees, help maintain basic health and municipal services, restart a shattered economy and avoid a security vacuum in the wake of Mr. Assad's fall, administration officials say.
Mindful of American mistakes following the invasion of Iraq in 2003, both agencies have created a number of cells to draft plans for what many officials expect to be a chaotic, violent aftermath that could spread instability over Syria's borders, even though no official could predict whether Mr. Assad's demise was weeks or months away.
The State Department is considering positioning additional food and medical supplies in the region and is studying how to dismantle the raft of American and European sanctions against Syria quickly to allow investment to flow in and business to resume, avoiding further deterioration of life for ordinary people.
Read more: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/world/middleeast/state-dept-and-pentagon-planning-for-post-assad-syria.xml
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)How can these politicians give away our money.. while America goes begging?
It has to stop.....
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's a myth that there isn't enough money.
David__77
(23,418 posts)Odd times indeed...
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Al Qaeda is as good as destroyed. If you object to strong Muslim political organizations that's one thing, but they aren't all Al Qaeda. Not even close.
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts).. these guys are rag-tag mercenaries who will fight under the name Al Queida or anything else.
They are the same group who fought in Lybia to overthrow Khaddify.
What did we gain in Lybia? What did we gain in Iraq? ( Iraq was a $3 trillion dollar war... BTW)
What can we gain in Syria? What can we gain in Yeman?
How 'bout we rebuild AMERICA for a change?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I'd rather they use my tax dollars which are normally sequestered for their wars to help create peace. Do you really thing they're going to spend less on Defense?
And there's enough money to take care of rebuilding AMERICA too. If you think there isn't you're believing a myth.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Is that, "deficits don't matter" statement.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Humanitarian aid, OK.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)the outcome of the armed overthrow of the minority Shi'ia regime by Sunni militants, even assuming that will happen.
Look up the history of Syria, and then the word "genocide".
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I'm concerned that we will be tempted to assume some sort of authoritative role, to assume a political role, and I think that would be at best premature, at worst a grave mistake.
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)Shouldn't the American Govt. be focused on rebuilding our economy... rather thtn raging yet anouther useless war?
Obama gave $25 Million to the Al Queida fighters in Syria.. how do the American people benefit from this?