Browns cap-and-trade deal could eventually kill high-speed rail
Source: San Francisco Chronicle
A last-minute deal that Gov. Jerry Brown made with Republican lawmakers to win support for a 10-year extension of his signature climate program could cost the governor another top priority: high-speed rail.
In extending Californias cap-and-trade system of controlling greenhouse-gas emissions through 2030, lawmakers approved a Republican plan this week to put a constitutional amendment before voters that seeks to give the minority party more say over how the programs money is spent. One-fourth of that money more than $1 billion so far and $500 million projected a year in the future goes toward high-speed rail, a project that Republicans widely oppose.
With the proposed $64 billion train line between Los Angeles and San Francisco facing not only Republican opposition but financial struggles, any cut in funding from the cap-and-trade program could be fatal.
This absolutely calls into question the viability of high-speed rail going forward, said Assemblyman Marc Steinorth, R-Rancho Cucamonga (San Bernardino County), who voted to extend cap and trade in part because of the proposed constitutional amendment. If the bullet train cant prove its worth, (this amendment) provides a pathway to ending the funding for the boondoggle once and for all.
Read more: http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Brown-s-cap-and-trade-deal-could-eventually-11303901.php
Why do republicans wish to destroy everything? It is like they wish for America to be a third world country.
kimbutgar
(21,215 posts)We get things done to help people here in California when rethugs are out of power. Pete Wilson and Arnold destroyed the rethugs in the state.
ProfessorGAC
(65,227 posts). . .doesn't $64 billion for a train line between LA and SF seem awfully steep? That's nearly $168 million dollars a mile!
That number just doesn't seem right.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)There's a lot of info there.
http://www.cahsrblog.com/
ProfessorGAC
(65,227 posts)Still don't think anything there justifies the per mile cost. Yes, i know there's far more than one line being considered, so it's really a lot lower than that, but still seems pricey. How far is it from Palmdale to Las Vegas? 240 miles? Maybe less. Even if the total system were 10 times the LA to SF distance, that still nearly $17 million per mile.
EX500rider
(10,874 posts)...that's more then the entire GDP of Costa Rica...or 115 other countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)