Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 05:03 PM Jul 2017

Dems want scrutiny of Ivanka Trump over Kushners Russian contacts

Source: Politico

Congressional Democrats raising questions about Jared Kushner’s campaign contacts with Russia are beginning to ask: What did Ivanka Trump know, and when?

President Donald Trump’s daughter and senior aide has largely escaped scrutiny while Kushner, her husband, has faced intensifying questions about his failure to disclose meetings with Russian officials and associates during the 2016 campaign and transition to the White House.

Those questions exploded this week, amid revelations that Kushner attended a Trump Tower meeting — arranged by the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr. — with officials purporting to have damaging information from the Russian government on Hillary Clinton.

Ivanka Trump, like Kushner, applied for a security clearance this past spring — and as a result, she was required to disclose not only her own foreign contacts, but those of her spouse and siblings as well.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/14/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-russia-democrats-240569

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems want scrutiny of Ivanka Trump over Kushners Russian contacts (Original Post) MelissaB Jul 2017 OP
The crown princess. murielm99 Jul 2017 #1
Rightly so. It's a family business. Hekate Jul 2017 #2
Dear Ivahhnkahh and Jahhr-uhhd: Still In Wisconsin Jul 2017 #3
Junior retailer hubby spy Solly Mack Jul 2017 #4
Oooh, she's gonna try to "architect" her way out of this one. Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2017 #5
The JarVanka Conundrum: republicans gone wrong Achilleaze Jul 2017 #6
Hope she will find a new career, like designing attractive women's separates in japple Jul 2017 #7
I doubt she can draw, fit, cut, sew, or tailor. She steals her designs. politicat Jul 2017 #11
About time we got around to Princess Champagne Popsicles flibbitygiblets Jul 2017 #8
"I wasn't expecting this level of viciousness" DesertRat Jul 2017 #10
She should be scrutinized and questioned (under oath). But I suspect she's clean. Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #9

murielm99

(30,753 posts)
1. The crown princess.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 05:06 PM
Jul 2017

She attends meetings, even when she has no standing to do so. I think their idea is that SHE will be the first female President.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
3. Dear Ivahhnkahh and Jahhr-uhhd:
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 05:16 PM
Jul 2017

Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 billion dollars.

japple

(9,834 posts)
7. Hope she will find a new career, like designing attractive women's separates in
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 07:17 PM
Jul 2017

orange cotton/poly, sizes S-XL.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
11. I doubt she can draw, fit, cut, sew, or tailor. She steals her designs.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 07:45 PM
Jul 2017

Her only utility to designers is providing other people's money by trading on the little social capital she has and her father's name. I assume she also steals from her employees.

Every person in her fashion orbit would be better served by selling on Etsy or competing on Project Runway or just teaching basic skills to hobbyists and students.

She is toxic, and within a short time, so will be everyone who ever had the bad judgement to work for her. I feel sorry for them -- fashion can be cut-throat. I hope they consider relocating and helping to rebuild the local and custom fashion and clothing industry.

flibbitygiblets

(7,220 posts)
8. About time we got around to Princess Champagne Popsicles
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 07:35 PM
Jul 2017

"I'm just going to be the First Daughter" she breathily lied, then sat in for old Pops when he needed to take a Drumph at the G20. Oh and thanks for fighting so hard for women's rights and everything, we really appreciate it Iskanka.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
9. She should be scrutinized and questioned (under oath). But I suspect she's clean.
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 07:38 PM
Jul 2017

I don't know why I'm guessing, since I'm floored the mob in the W.H. is as corrupt as it is....now, ANYTHING is possible.

But I suspect Kushner and Daddy got together & decided to keep Ivanka out of everything, to keep her "pure." She doesn't seem like the inquisitive type, anyway, or suspecting of outright corruption under her nose.

Then again, she married someone whose billionaire father was sent to prison for fraud, and the son fully supported his father and blamed the prosecutor, not the father for his fraudulent behavior. If she approved of that attitude....

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems want scrutiny of Iva...