Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:12 PM Jul 2017

Ex-Bush ethics lawyer on Trump Jr: 'This borders on treason'

Source: The Hill

An ethics lawyer under former President George W. Bush blasted Donald Trump Jr. for meeting with a Russian lawyer who claimed to have compromising information on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton during the campaign, saying it “borders on treason.”

“This was an effort to get opposition research on an opponent in an American political campaign from the Russians, who were known to be engaged in spying inside the United States,” Richard Painter said Sunday on MSNBC.

“We do not get our opposition research from spies, we do not collaborate with Russian spies, unless we want to be accused of treason.”

Painter said the Bush administration would not have allowed the meeting, which was attended by Trump Jr., White House senior adviser and President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, to happen.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341223-ex-bush-ethics-lawyer-on-trump-jr-meeting-with-russian-lawyer-this



Painter says that under previous Administration, one or both of them would be in custody.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-Bush ethics lawyer on Trump Jr: 'This borders on treason' (Original Post) pnwmom Jul 2017 OP
Poor Richard Painter. madaboutharry Jul 2017 #1
I get the same feeling about him. This is hell for all of us, but for some ... Hekate Jul 2017 #21
Borders???????? joanbarnes Jul 2017 #2
It is treason Matthew28 Jul 2017 #3
Lock him up. Hieronymus Jul 2017 #4
It's not treason because Little Trump is a Republican DavidDvorkin Jul 2017 #5
Especially with not fooled Jul 2017 #7
Right. DavidDvorkin Jul 2017 #13
Of course. dalton99a Jul 2017 #6
Trump makes Dubya Turbineguy Jul 2017 #8
Dubya looked into Putin's soul and saw good. LOL Hieronymus Jul 2017 #11
And Queen Elizabeth looked into Dubya's soul Turbineguy Jul 2017 #12
See, I always thought that if a private citizen works with a foreign enemy nation... Crash2Parties Jul 2017 #9
You're thinking of espionage or perhaps some other crimes, such as conspiracy. Liberty Belle Jul 2017 #20
Thanks. Okay, same question regarding espionage or conspiracy! Crash2Parties Jul 2017 #22
Yes. All of them could be indicted on these charges, except for Trump and Pence, Liberty Belle Jul 2017 #23
This is what I have become hoping to see these clowns in prison orange TEB Jul 2017 #10
Thankfully, Don Jr. is too dumb to cover up his collusion DesertRat Jul 2017 #14
It is treason Achilleaze Jul 2017 #15
KR Me. Jul 2017 #16
The penalty for treason is death. Moostache Jul 2017 #17
If that is not treason, nothing is. TomCADem Jul 2017 #18
The U.S. Constitution has a very narrow definition of treason: Liberty Belle Jul 2017 #19
Okay, Trumpies, Doug the Dem Jul 2017 #24

madaboutharry

(40,219 posts)
1. Poor Richard Painter.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:15 PM
Jul 2017

Every time I see the man on television he looks like he is going to collapse under the weight of the indignity and outrage.

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
21. I get the same feeling about him. This is hell for all of us, but for some ...
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 02:34 AM
Jul 2017

...the sense of personal betrayal must be just about insupportable.

DavidDvorkin

(19,485 posts)
5. It's not treason because Little Trump is a Republican
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 08:25 PM
Jul 2017

Anything is okay if you're a Republican. Apparently.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
9. See, I always thought that if a private citizen works with a foreign enemy nation...
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 09:01 PM
Jul 2017

to do something like interfere with our elections, that was a crime. Not a "let's hold Congressional hearings" sort of maybe crime, but more of a "I'm from the FBI or NSA and you are under arrest" sort of crime.

Am I wrong? Do some collusions with foreign enemy nations just legally get ignored because of family ties?

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
20. You're thinking of espionage or perhaps some other crimes, such as conspiracy.
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 12:52 AM
Jul 2017

But treason can only be determined by Congress, and the definition is very narrow. See my post above.

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
23. Yes. All of them could be indicted on these charges, except for Trump and Pence,
Tue Jul 11, 2017, 03:09 AM
Jul 2017

Who would have to first be impeached. But the rest could be rounded up, charged, convicted and imprisoned if prosecutors have the balls to do it.

Of course having Donnie Jr. on the line for a major crime with potential prison time could also be used as leverage to get Trump senior to resign. Maybe they'd go lighter on the doltish son if it meant getting the evildoer Dad out of office.

Though personally I'd like to see them both in matching orange jumpsuits.

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
17. The penalty for treason is death.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 11:11 PM
Jul 2017

That is why no one is calling it what it is.

The Trump scion should be under indictment for treason and facing the gallows.
The Trump scam is up, and its time to pay the piper.

I don't think elephants have much reason to fear a tail hacking piece of shit much longer...

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
19. The U.S. Constitution has a very narrow definition of treason:
Mon Jul 10, 2017, 12:50 AM
Jul 2017

You have to levy war against the U.S. or give aid and comfort to the enemies. [No war levied in this case. Did Donnie Jr. offer any aid to Russia in exchange for damning info? Don't know. But just getting info from enemies isn't treason. Even offering aid, if we are not at war with the "enemy", wouldn't be treason apparently]

Per a later law passed, only Congress can decide if treason has occurred, and then only if the person accused confessed in open court, or if there are two witnesses against him. That's a difficult standard to meet, and well it should be, as the penalty is death. Those who cover up treason can also face penalties including up to 7 years in prison:

http://www.nytimes.com/1861/01/25/news/treason-against-the-united-states.html?pagewanted=all


By Section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution of the United States, it is declared that:

"Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason."

In 1790, the Congress of the United States enacted that:

"If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars."

 

Doug the Dem

(1,297 posts)
24. Okay, Trumpies,
Tue Jul 11, 2017, 06:06 AM
Jul 2017

When an ethics specialist from the GEORGE W FUCKING BUSH Administration is shitting on you, it is very, VERY bad!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ex-Bush ethics lawyer on ...