Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 12:19 PM Apr 2017

Administration is "partially to blame" for Syria chemical attack, McCain says

Source: MSN/CBS News

WASHINGTON -- Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, said comments made by people in President Donald Trump’s administration are “partially to blame” for encouraging Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s apparent use of chemical weapons on his people last week.

McCain responded to remarks that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson made at the end of March, before the attack, including comments that the Syrian people would determine Assad’s fate, and that removing him from power isn’t a top priority.

“I think it probably was partially to blame,” McCain said. “And Secretary Tillerson basically saying the same thing after kind of contradicting himself and then saying the same thing argues vigorously for a plan and a strategy. As I said again, taking this action I support and was important.”

McCain also said he does “not agree” with Tillerson’s position that the U.S. needs to concentrate on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) before it can further address Assad’s purported brutality against his own people, saying ISIS and Assad are “totally connected” issues.

Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/administration-is-partially-to-blame-for-syria-chemical-attack-mccain-says/ar-BBzByK9?li=BBnb7Kz

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Administration is "partially to blame" for Syria chemical attack, McCain says (Original Post) TomCADem Apr 2017 OP
McDuffus is a directionless fart. pangaia Apr 2017 #1
What you say and tweet matters! yallerdawg Apr 2017 #2
You can't reasonably get from Igel Apr 2017 #9
Sorry John but most of us know you arent a real maverick and will bow down and brown nose like the cstanleytech Apr 2017 #3
He talks all "mavericky" lark Apr 2017 #4
Exactly, he is all talk and its a huge part of why he lost to Obama. cstanleytech Apr 2017 #7
Trump isn't doing all this on his own bluestarone Apr 2017 #5
Okay, here's the deal Johnny ... DK504 Apr 2017 #6
It's easy to despise McCain, however the fact that a major Republican is NOT moving in lock step McCamy Taylor Apr 2017 #8
They show this behavior rather frequently. Igel Apr 2017 #10
K and R. riversedge Apr 2017 #11

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
2. What you say and tweet matters!
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 12:27 PM
Apr 2017

A 180 degree turnabout in policy and promise hinges on what the Liar-in-Chief sees on TV, and maybe who is in the room with him making comments?

Fareed Zakaria broadcast pictures of children starving all over Africa right now - in case "someone important" was watching, someone who suddenly seems to be concerned about humanitarian issues.

Fox News was and is celebrating "our glorious leader"!

He was probably out golfing.

Igel

(35,309 posts)
9. You can't reasonably get from
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 08:39 PM
Apr 2017

"the Syrian people will decide" to "this means I'm free to commit war crimes and gas my own citizens."

We're friends with Britain. Does that mean the government has permission and even encouragement from us to round up people and kill them?


Oddly, I don't see the turnaround. There are perfectly valid interpretations that don't require it--in fact, they all but predict something like the Tomahawk attack. It's like the UV catastrophe in physics. It's all over the place, there's no making sense of it, so something must be wrong with the universe.

Or something's wrong with our theory. Which is what Planck nicely showed.

Then again, I'm trained in linguistics, and one of the overriding assumptions is that behind the sea of random inconsistency called "speech" are regular patterns and processes at the individual language level as well as in terms of universal principles governing constraints on what languages can be like. Functional linguistics and their random picking and choosing of data to support their non-falsifiable ideas that make no predictions entirely aside.

The problem is that the pattern may not be where you're looking.

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
3. Sorry John but most of us know you arent a real maverick and will bow down and brown nose like the
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 12:30 PM
Apr 2017

rest of the Repugnants and you proved that multiple times most recently with your vote to do away with filibuster to get Gorsuch in so please kindly fuck off, thank you.

bluestarone

(16,941 posts)
5. Trump isn't doing all this on his own
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 01:51 PM
Apr 2017

They(republicans) all talk but continue to vote for whatever Trump wants kinda SCARY if you know what i mean

DK504

(3,847 posts)
6. Okay, here's the deal Johnny ...
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 01:53 PM
Apr 2017

"... President Donald Trump’s administration are “partially to blame” for encouraging Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s apparent use of chemical weapons on his people last week. "

You are still defending this walking, talking piece of roach shit even after EVERY thing he has said about you. WTF is wrong with you? WTF.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
8. It's easy to despise McCain, however the fact that a major Republican is NOT moving in lock step
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 05:06 PM
Apr 2017

with a Republican administration when it comes to foreign policy is a huge deal.

Trump is still toast and will continue to be toast no matter how many cruise missiles he lobs at Syria/and or North Korea.

Igel

(35,309 posts)
10. They show this behavior rather frequently.
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 08:42 PM
Apr 2017

But you have to either have your face smashed into the fact or have some pressing reason to notice the fact to actually perceive it.

Otherwise the news and perceptions of the political foe is rather like a cat hairball versus a cat's actual coat. All you see is an amorphous mass that's been chewed into unrecognizability; you know it's hair, you know it's cat hair, and unless you actually pay attention to cats instead of the hairball you may never see the difference.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Administration is "partia...