Caught on camera: The moment police fired at women and children with rubber bullets in LA 'riot'
Last edited Mon Jul 23, 2012, 12:50 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Daily Mail
The headline says "LA" but actually this is in Anaheim:
Police dog rushes into crowd and bites man in fight on the street
Riot started after fatal shooting of man, 24, who was running from officers
Two policemen suspended in aftermath of protests
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Shocking video has emerged which depicts police officers firing rubber bullets into a rioting crowd which includes women and children.
The footage also shows a police dog rushing in to the fray and nearly knocking over a mother who was pushing her baby in a stroller.
The violent scenes came in the wake of an incident where a 24-year-old man was shot dead after running away from police, two of whom have now been suspended.
As officers were investigating what happened at the scene in Anaheim, California on Saturday, an angry group of people began yelling and throwing bottles at them, according to Sergeant Bob Dunn.
After police detained several people, the crowd apparently advanced on the officers, who responded by firing tear gas and beanbag rounds at them.
Video captured by a bystander and broadcast by KCAL-TV showed a chaotic scene in which officers fired beanbag rounds as some people ducked to the ground and others scattered screaming.
A man is seen yelling at an officer even as a weapon is pointed at him, while two adults huddled to shield a boy and girl.
Meanwhile, a police dog ran into several people sitting on the grass, including a woman and a child in a stroller, before biting a man in the arm.
The woman with the child was Susan Lopez, who tearfully told KCAL: 'They just released the dog, and I had my baby in my stroller.'
<snip>
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2177496/Anaheim-riots-Video-shows-police-firing-women-children.html#ixzz21SlQXu1H
tosh
(4,423 posts)Horrendous.
Response to villager (Original post)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)This was a violent, unprovoked police riot.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)NOLALady
(4,003 posts)until they provoke a full scale riot. A riot that will not be your Daddy's riot.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)They will then get to test our their new hi tech weapons and surveillance equipment.
And we should invest in companies that make them...the returns will be great.
Response to villager (Original post)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)The way NRA proponents encourage.
Who thinks that would have made the situation better?
It would endanger people even more and would have given the police a stronger defense for their horrific actions.
Response to Kablooie (Reply #8)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)So they don't see where "Citizens" (as in Whites) are being assaulted at all.
Never mind that California was once part of Mexico and some of these, so called, "Mexicans" are the sixth generation decedents of people who voted for Statehood in 1849. They will NEVER accept the notion that these "Mexicans" are legal Citizens equal to themselves. They can't look at them without thinking they are illegal and on welfare and need to be deported.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)There were plenty of cops of color in that scene.
Response to xtraxritical (Reply #24)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Spot one black cop in a group of cops beating the hell out of Hispanics and say, "See? It can't be racist."
Even if he's not taking part but just standing there.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Next you will claim the Hispanic and black gangs in prison hang out together.
rwsanders
(2,603 posts)Instead it's a bunch of scared gun nuts.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)someone with a gun on them, when it occured, said they almost shot the wrong person.
Response to Kablooie (Reply #8)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)And certainly doesn't mean that insane people should have free access weapons of war.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)certainly does not mean everyone in the population walking around with a concealed weapon.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)so only they should be armed to prevent these kinds of mass public shootings?
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #25)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Ie one that is well armed and trains all the time, would be no threat to public safety.
They would never flip out and start shooting in to crowds of women and children.
Right?
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #36)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)it allows people like you to push for a more powerful police force to protect us so we should give up on defending the 2nd amendment and just let people like you push for a more powerful police force to protect us?
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #45)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Sorry but you aren't giving a serious argument so I'm just going to have fun with you from now on.
/seriously, nothing you wrote related at all to what I said. It's like reading a response written at a 45 degree angle view through a mirror.
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #48)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)and see what kind of a response you get.
Throw out ad hominems, non-sequiturs and other bad latiny phrases and you will simply get laughter from me.
Life's too short to worry about what people like you think.
Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #50)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #57)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #50)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)I can't help thinking, in light of the gun nuts' typical reaction to recent events:
Where are all the RKBA supporters and NRA members who swear they have a right to be heavily armed to prevent government from abusing our rights?
Most, by choice, do not live in California due to the gun restrictions and CCW restrictions.
radhika
(1,008 posts)Host is Mario Solis-Marich, and he's going into depth and background. Good.
Usually, these stories get buried. The people of Anahiem (mostly Latino) have had several incidents in recent months. Now there is film footage.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)i really think this needs to be looked at with a bigger eye
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Too many of them think it's their job to beat minorities to a pulp who get out of line.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)There's way too much reverse racial innuendo (and outright) on this site. If you want to stop racism stop being racist. Just because by accident of birth I may be white and you're not, you have no more right / reason to denigrate me than I do to denigrate you.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)As part of a protest?
Response to xtraxritical (Reply #27)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)We've seen many incidences of police brutality in recent years. What do we get from the DOJ? A big yawn.
On the other hand, this is an election year.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)almost every cop I know is a trigger happy arrogant, authority type!
alfredo
(60,074 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Response to xtraxritical (Reply #28)
bupkus This message was self-deleted by its author.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Only if the cop is out of shape and would have had a heart attack if he kept running.
You can be shot in the back while you are cowering in fear saying, "I want my mommy."
Or you can be yelling "Die mother fucker!" while aiming a gun at the policemen and see he's already aiming at you. You spin around and get shot in the back.
One's self defense. One isn't. So, yeah, in principle you can be shot in the back in self defense. Police have human reaction times. They're people.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)guard claimed self defense. The closest victim was 90 yards away.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)Let go or the dog charged away from his control.
atreides1
(16,079 posts)We all know that some dogs are very smart...this one was able to figure out how to open the car door!
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)Thanks for the thread, villager.
smiley
(1,432 posts)My first reaction when I saw the dog bite the civilian was, that if that had been a civilian's dog even motioning towards a policeman, then that dog would have been shot.
But since it's a cop's dog doing the biting then AOK!
I love dogs and I'm sure the dog was only doing what the cops told him to do. But man... I fucking hate cops.
shanti
(21,675 posts)glad i left, they are out of control!
SILVER__FOX52
(535 posts)are cowardly gate keepers for the rich and consider Public dissent, as some sort of Crime. What a mess this Country is. It is so corrupt it's like bizzaro United States world and we have no leadership to do what is needed. Some of these Cops are psychopaths and criminals.
NeoConsSuck
(2,544 posts)We have to go across the pond to read about this?
bongbong
(5,436 posts)Welcome to the Land Of Liberty!
USA! USA! USA!