Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:59 AM Mar 2017

Jury Secrecy Doesnt Apply if Marred by Bias, Supreme Court Rules

Source: The New York Times

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that courts must make an exception to the usual rule that jury deliberations are secret when evidence emerges that those discussions were marred by racial or ethnic bias.

“The nation must continue to make strides to overcome race-based discrimination,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority. “The progress that has already been made underlies the court’s insistence that blatant racial prejudice is antithetical to the functioning of the jury system and must be confronted in egregious cases.”

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion.

In dissent, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas, wrote that the decision was a well intentioned but ill-considered intrusion into jurors’ privacy. “This is a startling development,” Justice Alito wrote, “and although the court tries to limit the degree of intrusion, it is doubtful that there are principled grounds for preventing the expansion of today’s holding.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/us/politics/supreme-court-jury-bias-secrecy.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury Secrecy Doesnt Apply if Marred by Bias, Supreme Court Rules (Original Post) brooklynite Mar 2017 OP
until 2020, Kennedy will be our only hope, and that should not make any of us feel comfortable still_one Mar 2017 #1
I am glad I am not trying cases anymore. AngryAmish Mar 2017 #2
Which will open all internet histories to scrutiny bucolic_frolic Mar 2017 #3
I never had a problem getting rid of the racists. AngryAmish Mar 2017 #4
I like that outcome. mpcamb Mar 2017 #5
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
2. I am glad I am not trying cases anymore.
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 12:08 PM
Mar 2017

Everytime someone gets whacked for a big number the losing side will hire private investigators on the jurors. Ugh.

bucolic_frolic

(43,249 posts)
3. Which will open all internet histories to scrutiny
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 12:35 PM
Mar 2017

'Any reason you can't serve on a jury?'

'I'm a ranting wacko, your Honor.'

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
4. I never had a problem getting rid of the racists.
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 01:23 PM
Mar 2017

One time we were picking and a juror who did not want to be there said they were prejudiced against black people. My client was black.

So they were striken for cause. But the judge made his racist ass sit in the jury assembly room for the week it took for the trial.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jury Secrecy Doesnt Apply...