Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:44 PM Mar 2017

Ryan: Still No Evidence Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia

Source: Talking Points Memo



By MATT SHUHAM Published MARCH 2, 2017, 12:22 PM EDT

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) downplayed revelations that Attorney General Jeff Sessions met twice with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the 2016 campaign, saying that he had still seen no evidence of an American colluding with Russia to interfere in the election.

Ryan side-stepped a question from one reporter Thursday on whether Sessions had misled the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation process, when he said he he hadn’t met with Russians during the 2016 campaign. The Washington Post reported that he did, but a spokesperson for Sessions has maintained Sessions was acting in his capacity as a member of the Armed Services Committee.

Ryan did say, however, that Sessions should recuse himself if he personally is the subject of an investigation.

On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal, citing “people familiar with the matter,” reported that U.S. investigators had examined contacts Sessions had with Russian officials while he was advising President Donald Trump’s campaign.

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ryan-democrats-are-lighting-their-hair-on-fire-sessions

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ryan: Still No Evidence Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2017 OP
There is none so blind as he who will not see. lark Mar 2017 #1
The investigation is over? chelsea0011 Mar 2017 #2
The building is on fire, but Ryan asks us to remain calm. ffr Mar 2017 #3
Involved Scarsdale Mar 2017 #24
What was his nickname in the 2012 election? Oh yeah, Lyin' Ryan. C Moon Mar 2017 #4
Remember Plucketeer Mar 2017 #16
Well done! C Moon Mar 2017 #21
no investogation or allowing FBI to release information they have..so of course beachbum bob Mar 2017 #5
Ryan: murielm99 Mar 2017 #6
They act like they don't get it... cannabis_flower Mar 2017 #7
Yes Scarsdale Mar 2017 #25
Because Liberalagogo Mar 2017 #8
Traitor! Marthe48 Mar 2017 #9
Playing word Games with the Public they serve DreamSmoker Mar 2017 #10
It's largely how Klansmen got away with their 20th century horrors. HughBeaumont Mar 2017 #11
Spit take Blue Owl Mar 2017 #12
Last I looked there were no conclusions reached by any of the investigations. Yet Nitram Mar 2017 #13
Of course not, because there's been no investigation. Kablooie Mar 2017 #14
OK, so the response for the moment is to stonewall. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2017 #15
Isn't that why we have investigations, Paulie? George II Mar 2017 #17
Richie Rich Ryan, the cover up King bronxiteforever Mar 2017 #18
Not yet, asshole. louis-t Mar 2017 #19
What a bald-faced liar Speaker Paul Ryan bucolic_frolic Mar 2017 #20
Hey Bobble Head Eddie Munster look a like............also know as Ayn Rand E$$ie Munster turbinetree Mar 2017 #22
SOME PEOPLE SAY.. coco22 Mar 2017 #23
They dont have all the evidence, yet. This is the typical rightwing bullshit. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2017 #26
Eddie Munster will have to resign MFM008 Mar 2017 #27
No alien life found, so stop looking rickford66 Mar 2017 #28
Hey, Ryan. Maybe if you took MurrayDelph Mar 2017 #29

lark

(23,123 posts)
1. There is none so blind as he who will not see.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:47 PM
Mar 2017

They refuse to hold hearings, so of course haven't heard anything, duh!!! Just shows the true depth of the Repug treachery.

ffr

(22,671 posts)
3. The building is on fire, but Ryan asks us to remain calm.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:48 PM
Mar 2017


Who does he think he's kidding. Oh my! That's got me laughing.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
24. Involved
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:24 PM
Mar 2017

McConnell refused to hold hearings for Garland as SC nominee for President Obama. He said "The next president will pick the SC nominee" How did he know it would be tRump? The fix was in way back when. McConnell's "wife" got a cushy government position out of it. What did Ryan get? Keep investigating, we might FINALLY get rid of the obstructionists in office. Are they all guilty of treason? Cruz in calling this a "nothing burger" Yeah, right. They got their panties in a wad over Benghazi, and e-mails. THIS is SERIOUS.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
16. Remember
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:24 PM
Mar 2017

Ryan used to drive the Weiner-mobile before he went to DC. A fact that seems SO fitting at the moment. Ryan's tryin' for an Oscar with his act - An Oscar Meyer weenie award.

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
7. They act like they don't get it...
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:56 PM
Mar 2017

Meeting with the Russian embassador is not necessarily a crime - but lying to Congress about the meeting definitely is!

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
25. Yes
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:29 PM
Mar 2017

they get it. Covering their own guilty asses at the moment. Good day to be a LAWYER in DC. Busy times ahead. McConnell is blocking any investigations, he has to know something. Ryan is his butt boy, just as involved.

DreamSmoker

(841 posts)
10. Playing word Games with the Public they serve
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:00 PM
Mar 2017

He is splitting Hairs with words.. All Republican say the very same words..
This is about who talked and what was said... Even if there was nothing Criminal committed..
Criminal Act is the Key Word.. Making Business Talk with Russian Crooks may not be a crime..
But Americans want the truth and Who is Lying to Us????? Period....

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
11. It's largely how Klansmen got away with their 20th century horrors.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:01 PM
Mar 2017

Their juries were loaded with fellow Klansmen/sympathizers.

"Nothing to see here" MY ASS.

Nitram

(22,825 posts)
13. Last I looked there were no conclusions reached by any of the investigations. Yet
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:09 PM
Mar 2017

They've just started, Paul. Aren't you jumping the gun? Prejudicing possible conclusions before they can be reached?

Kablooie

(18,635 posts)
14. Of course not, because there's been no investigation.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:10 PM
Mar 2017

Everyone is choking on smoke but of course, there's no fire.

Can they keep this up for the next 4 years?
My money says ... yes.

If there was no wrong doing they'd want a full investigation immediately to clear things up and get this troublesome scandal out of the way but if they are culpable, the revelations from a real investigation would drive voters away.

If they keep denying and never investigate, the scandal will hang over their heads continuously but their voters will be perfectly happy to believe them and keep voting Republican.

If you were in their shoes you'd probably want to do the same thing.

It's really the only strategy they have.
The big question is will it work?

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
15. OK, so the response for the moment is to stonewall.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:11 PM
Mar 2017

Got it. That should work well. For a supposed "student of history" Ryan appears to be woefully lacking in knowledge about US history in the early/mid 1970's.

Personally I think his self-proclaimed status as a historian is about as true as his self-proclaimed status as a sub-3:00:00 marathon runner.

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
22. Hey Bobble Head Eddie Munster look a like............also know as Ayn Rand E$$ie Munster
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:16 PM
Mar 2017

if there was nothing there, let's have a "independent" prosecutor to delve into the Sh*t, that you and everyone of the cronies have "created" for yourselves and trying to deflect with all of your spineless might.

You, Chafftez, Gordy, spent millions on a woman running for the presidential office, and finding out there was NO there there, and you and others of your ilk didn't even bat an eye to stop, not happening zippy the twinkle toes.


Lying to a U.S. Senator in any capacity for a job description and into a inquiry to find out if you should be "confirmed to be the Head Law Enforcement officer of the Judaical Branch" there E$$ie Munster, is NOT a good thing.




Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
26. They dont have all the evidence, yet. This is the typical rightwing bullshit.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:30 PM
Mar 2017

We know what happened, Paul.

Are you a patriot or a fucking treasonous little shit?

MurrayDelph

(5,299 posts)
29. Hey, Ryan. Maybe if you took
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 04:42 PM
Mar 2017

your fingers out of your ears, opened your eyes, and stopped trilling "La, La, La! I can't hear you!"

you might "see" the evidence.

But then, you might not be able to mold the country into your Ayn Randian wet dream.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ryan: Still No Evidence O...