Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,334 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:14 PM Feb 2017

Trump May Change the Way Trade Deficit Calculated

Source: political wire






February 19, 2017 By Taegan Goddard

36 Comments
..........................


“The leading idea under consideration would exclude from U.S. exports any goods first imported into the country, such as cars, and then transferred to a third country like Canada or Mexico unchanged… A larger trade deficit would give the Trump administration ammunition in arguing that trade deals need to be renegotiated, and might help boost political support for imposing tariffs.”




Read more: https://politicalwire.com/2017/02/19/trump-may-change-way-trade-deficit-calculated/?utm_content=buffered2c6&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer



Change the rules to the way you like them.



27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump May Change the Way Trade Deficit Calculated (Original Post) riversedge Feb 2017 OP
...And Ketchup IS a vegetable! Newspeak 2.0 strikes again! Tweets on the half hour. Ford_Prefect Feb 2017 #1
Behave and eat your Freedom Fries. NT mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2017 #2
the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned. IronLionZion Feb 2017 #7
This was OUR Country long before it was His. Let Him leave first! I'll even provide the boat. Ford_Prefect Feb 2017 #8
'New Math,' I guess. elleng Feb 2017 #3
How very Republican of him. old guy Feb 2017 #4
GOP has never owned up to the 12 Trillion$ of Defict spending Cryptoad Feb 2017 #10
The figures for the sale and export of weapons systems and ammo to our NATO alllies TheDebbieDee Feb 2017 #5
When those weapons are paid for by US tax money granted as foreign aid it is still a deficit. Ford_Prefect Feb 2017 #6
Yes they are and always have been Progressive dog Feb 2017 #18
Gotta remember that the GOP doesn't believe in Math... Cryptoad Feb 2017 #9
That's how Reagan "reduced" unemployment and inflation - he changed the way they were.... George II Feb 2017 #11
Exactly. tenorly Feb 2017 #14
I don't see how importing cars into this country made Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #12
True that. tenorly Feb 2017 #15
There is no question our screwed up Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #23
Thank you for the insight. tenorly Feb 2017 #24
They are counted as imports when they are brought in. bornskeptic Feb 2017 #25
This seems like a way to punish California for not voting for him jmowreader Feb 2017 #13
He's so freaking stupid he'll probably punish New York, too! George II Feb 2017 #16
The US runs a trade surplus with Canada, its biggest trading partner. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #17
And a big part of the reason we have trade deficits is the strength of the dollar TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #19
Just like his "empire" when they went into bankruptcy, just change the books turbinetree Feb 2017 #20
We should all be chanting AC_Mem Feb 2017 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Motown_Johnny Feb 2017 #22
USA imports a lot of foods grown/slaughtered cheap & ships it right out to other countries at.. Sunlei Feb 2017 #26
Odd, didn't Bush do something like that? Doreen Feb 2017 #27

IronLionZion

(45,550 posts)
7. the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:39 PM
Feb 2017

so stop whining and do as you're told




 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
5. The figures for the sale and export of weapons systems and ammo to our NATO alllies
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:25 PM
Feb 2017

is NOT currently included in the trade totals. I'm not sure, but I don't think weapons sales/exports have EVER been included in the trade totals. If these sales, through the Department of Defense and have always been okayed beforehand by the State Department (hence all the "Hillary sold weapons to donors of the Clinton Fund" - it was her duty as Sec of State to approve these weapons sales by the Department of Defense) okayed by the State Department (were included, there might not actually be much of a trade deficit, but this is purely speculation on my part...

Progressive dog

(6,921 posts)
18. Yes they are and always have been
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 08:26 PM
Feb 2017

Even when weapons are given away (which is a small percentage of weapons sales), the cost is foreign aid but the weapons are still exported.

George II

(67,782 posts)
11. That's how Reagan "reduced" unemployment and inflation - he changed the way they were....
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 06:02 PM
Feb 2017

...calculated.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
14. Exactly.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 07:10 PM
Feb 2017

Nixon, we now know, tried to strong arm the BLS to do the same with CPI data when inflation hit double digits in 1974; luckily Watergate intervened.

The most egregious such manipulation took place under Bush though.

There's was the policy of putting the two wars "off budget" of course (which shaved around $170 billion a year from the headline deficit figure). And who can forget the perennial "3.3%" inflation readings - all the while prices for food, gas, rent, insurance, etc. were rising by leaps and bounds.

My guess is that, like with all of Dubya's more crafty ideas, Turd Blossom Rove had a lot to do with that.

Demsrule86

(68,703 posts)
12. I don't see how importing cars into this country made
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 06:03 PM
Feb 2017

abroad and then counting them as a US export if they are sent elsewhere has ever been a good thing...I hate Trump. He is not the man to fix trade as American companies like Ford or GM will suffer but trade needs to be fixed.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
15. True that.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 07:15 PM
Feb 2017

You might recall that when NAFTA was being negotiated under Poppy Bush (who truly deserves the blame for it, not Clinton), they almost snuck in a provision that would have allowed Canadian and Mexican cars sold in the U.S. to be counted as "domestic."

Oh boy.

Demsrule86

(68,703 posts)
23. There is no question our screwed up
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 03:44 PM
Feb 2017

trade situation lead to the election of ass hat Trump who promised much but will deliver nothing...if he goes after American cars without some sort of Tariff on Korean, Japanese and European cars...he will drive the American autos out of business. He is a light weight and stupid...my son is laid off in Ohio...cars are not selling...autos are the first to show signs of recession and the first to show signs we are getting out of a recession...get ready, it will be a shit show...as an auto wife, I have seen it all. Hubs works for parts plant now...so far he is employed. He is an engineer.

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
25. They are counted as imports when they are brought in.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 04:06 PM
Feb 2017

If they are counted as exports when sent out, the overall effect on the balance of trade is nothing, as it should be. If they aren't counted as exports when shipped out it artificially increases the trade deficit, which, apparently, Trump wants to do.

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
13. This seems like a way to punish California for not voting for him
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 06:49 PM
Feb 2017

If this action causes tariffs to be implemented on goods imported from MX, the resulting trade war will cause companies currently trans shipping through Long Beach to use Mexican ports. (Goods trans shipped through MX will incur no tariff.) This will lead to layoffs at California ports.

Expect every state he didn't win to feel the brunt of his wrath.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,047 posts)
17. The US runs a trade surplus with Canada, its biggest trading partner.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 07:51 PM
Feb 2017

More trade (both ways) crosses the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor than there is trade with Japan.

One bridge. And there are many other routes between Canada and the US.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,220 posts)
19. And a big part of the reason we have trade deficits is the strength of the dollar
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 08:54 PM
Feb 2017

The dollar strengthened 25% between 2014 and 2015. The good news is we can buy more stuff with our bucks. The bad news is that it makes our goods more expensive as exports.

But the deficit is coming down. In 2006 it was at its highest - around $750 Billion. Now it's around $500 Billion. So the trade deficit dropped by 1/3 during the Obama administration. Exactly how much faster do people expect it to drop?

Most folks would agree that our average standard of living is higher than it is in China and India. So, on average, China and India will buy less of our consumer goods than vice versa. That may change as China and India's economies grow, but to do that, they need us to BUY THEIR STUFF.

Response to riversedge (Original post)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
26. USA imports a lot of foods grown/slaughtered cheap & ships it right out to other countries at..
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 04:19 PM
Feb 2017

huge profits. So now they want exclusion from their corporate secret?

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
27. Odd, didn't Bush do something like that?
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 04:23 PM
Feb 2017

With Bush I remember literally going to bed being below low income level and the next morning I was middle class. I was bringing in the same amount of income and no longer qualified for some types of help...overnight!! Prices on everything also went up. Is this what he is planning?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump May Change the Way ...