Trump May Change the Way Trade Deficit Calculated
Source: political wire
February 19, 2017 By Taegan Goddard
36 Comments
..........................
The leading idea under consideration would exclude from U.S. exports any goods first imported into the country, such as cars, and then transferred to a third country like Canada or Mexico unchanged
A larger trade deficit would give the Trump administration ammunition in arguing that trade deals need to be renegotiated, and might help boost political support for imposing tariffs.
Read more: https://politicalwire.com/2017/02/19/trump-may-change-way-trade-deficit-calculated/?utm_content=buffered2c6&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Change the rules to the way you like them.
Link to tweet
Ford_Prefect
(7,924 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,656 posts)IronLionZion
(45,550 posts)so stop whining and do as you're told
Ford_Prefect
(7,924 posts)elleng
(131,176 posts)old guy
(3,284 posts)Move the goal posts.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)they have given us.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)is NOT currently included in the trade totals. I'm not sure, but I don't think weapons sales/exports have EVER been included in the trade totals. If these sales, through the Department of Defense and have always been okayed beforehand by the State Department (hence all the "Hillary sold weapons to donors of the Clinton Fund" - it was her duty as Sec of State to approve these weapons sales by the Department of Defense) okayed by the State Department (were included, there might not actually be much of a trade deficit, but this is purely speculation on my part...
Ford_Prefect
(7,924 posts)Progressive dog
(6,921 posts)Even when weapons are given away (which is a small percentage of weapons sales), the cost is foreign aid but the weapons are still exported.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)just make up numbers that suite ya, heh?
George II
(67,782 posts)...calculated.
tenorly
(2,037 posts)Nixon, we now know, tried to strong arm the BLS to do the same with CPI data when inflation hit double digits in 1974; luckily Watergate intervened.
The most egregious such manipulation took place under Bush though.
There's was the policy of putting the two wars "off budget" of course (which shaved around $170 billion a year from the headline deficit figure). And who can forget the perennial "3.3%" inflation readings - all the while prices for food, gas, rent, insurance, etc. were rising by leaps and bounds.
My guess is that, like with all of Dubya's more crafty ideas, Turd Blossom Rove had a lot to do with that.
Demsrule86
(68,703 posts)abroad and then counting them as a US export if they are sent elsewhere has ever been a good thing...I hate Trump. He is not the man to fix trade as American companies like Ford or GM will suffer but trade needs to be fixed.
tenorly
(2,037 posts)You might recall that when NAFTA was being negotiated under Poppy Bush (who truly deserves the blame for it, not Clinton), they almost snuck in a provision that would have allowed Canadian and Mexican cars sold in the U.S. to be counted as "domestic."
Oh boy.
Demsrule86
(68,703 posts)trade situation lead to the election of ass hat Trump who promised much but will deliver nothing...if he goes after American cars without some sort of Tariff on Korean, Japanese and European cars...he will drive the American autos out of business. He is a light weight and stupid...my son is laid off in Ohio...cars are not selling...autos are the first to show signs of recession and the first to show signs we are getting out of a recession...get ready, it will be a shit show...as an auto wife, I have seen it all. Hubs works for parts plant now...so far he is employed. He is an engineer.
tenorly
(2,037 posts)All the Best to you and your husband, Demsrule86.
bornskeptic
(1,330 posts)If they are counted as exports when sent out, the overall effect on the balance of trade is nothing, as it should be. If they aren't counted as exports when shipped out it artificially increases the trade deficit, which, apparently, Trump wants to do.
jmowreader
(50,566 posts)If this action causes tariffs to be implemented on goods imported from MX, the resulting trade war will cause companies currently trans shipping through Long Beach to use Mexican ports. (Goods trans shipped through MX will incur no tariff.) This will lead to layoffs at California ports.
Expect every state he didn't win to feel the brunt of his wrath.
George II
(67,782 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)More trade (both ways) crosses the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor than there is trade with Japan.
One bridge. And there are many other routes between Canada and the US.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,220 posts)The dollar strengthened 25% between 2014 and 2015. The good news is we can buy more stuff with our bucks. The bad news is that it makes our goods more expensive as exports.
But the deficit is coming down. In 2006 it was at its highest - around $750 Billion. Now it's around $500 Billion. So the trade deficit dropped by 1/3 during the Obama administration. Exactly how much faster do people expect it to drop?
Most folks would agree that our average standard of living is higher than it is in China and India. So, on average, China and India will buy less of our consumer goods than vice versa. That may change as China and India's economies grow, but to do that, they need us to BUY THEIR STUFF.
turbinetree
(24,722 posts)AC_Mem
(1,979 posts)WHERE ARE THE JOBS????
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Motown_Johnny This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)huge profits. So now they want exclusion from their corporate secret?
Doreen
(11,686 posts)With Bush I remember literally going to bed being below low income level and the next morning I was middle class. I was bringing in the same amount of income and no longer qualified for some types of help...overnight!! Prices on everything also went up. Is this what he is planning?