Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 11:05 AM Jan 2017

Supreme Court rejects Texas appeal over voter ID law

Source: Reuters



23 JAN 2017 AT 09:45 ET

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by Texas seeking to revive the state’s strict Republican-backed voter-identification requirements that a lower court found had a discriminatory effect on black and Hispanic people.

The justices let stand a July 2016 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found that the 2011 Texas statute ran afoul of a federal law that bars racial discrimination in elections and directed a lower court to find a way to fix the law’s discriminatory effects against minorities.

There were no noted dissents from the high court’s decision not to hear the case from any of the eight justices, but Chief Justice John Roberts took the unusual step of issuing a statement explaining why the case was not taken up, noting that litigation on the matter is continuing in lower courts.

Roberts said that although there was “no barrier to our review,” all the legal issues can be raised on appeal at a later time.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/supreme-court-rejects-texas-appeal-over-voter-id-law/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JudyM

(29,277 posts)
1. It'd be better news if Roberts hadn't issued his statement, which only encourages other states
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 11:34 AM
Jan 2017

to keep their restrictions and fight harder.

cstanleytech

(26,319 posts)
2. I'm sure that the next step the Republicans will take will be to abolish as many federal laws that
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 12:15 PM
Jan 2017

block them from being legally able to discriminate.

DK504

(3,847 posts)
3. Hey Roberts
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 12:32 PM
Jan 2017

maybe you and your asshole cronies shouldn't have gotten rid of Section 5. You piece of shit.

Amishman

(5,559 posts)
4. In other words 'we will wait for a conservative majority to take up this type of issue'
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:05 PM
Jan 2017

I see a future appeal of this (or another identical) law resulting in a 5-4 decision supporting voter id

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects Tex...